{"title":"龟头阴茎注射透明质酸凝胶治疗早泄的临床疗效和安全性：系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mehmet Gokhan Culha, Caner Baran, Mustafa Erkoc","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). The efficacy of this treatment is quite controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glans penis augmentation with HA gel for PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), primary clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, case series, and case reports. Searches in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed blindly by 2 reviewers.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), questionnaires about PE, glans circumference (millimeters), and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in the evaluation: 4 RCTs, 8 prospective observational studies, and 1 restrospective study. The number of patients who received HA gel on the glans penis was 706. According to the results of 2 placebo-controlled RCTs, HA gel treatment significantly improved IELT at the end of the first month (mean difference [MD], 65.44 seconds). In the first month after the HA gel injection procedure, IELT increased vs before the procedure (MD, 176.18 [95% CI, 146.89-205.48]; P < .001, I2 = 83%). When the IELT values were compared at 6 months after HA gel application, IELT improved vs before the procedure (MD, 143.93 [95% CI, 124.78-163.09]; P < .001, I2 = 82). The glans circumference expanded by approximately 1.5 cm after the procedure (MD, 14.82 mm [95% CI, 12.75-16.90]; P < .001, I2 = 65%). When the side effect profile of other studies was examined, side effects were observed in 91 patients after HA gel injection applied to 598 patients (15.22%). Among these side effects, the most common were pain (n = 46, 7.69%), bulla/nodule formation (n = 25, 4.18%), and ecchymosis (n = 20, 3.34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HA shows promise as a therapeutic option for PE, ongoing research is essential to elucidate its clinical utility, mechanisms of action, and comparative efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid gel injection in the glans penis for treatment of premature ejaculation: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Gokhan Culha, Caner Baran, Mustafa Erkoc\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). The efficacy of this treatment is quite controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glans penis augmentation with HA gel for PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), primary clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, case series, and case reports. Searches in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed blindly by 2 reviewers.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), questionnaires about PE, glans circumference (millimeters), and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in the evaluation: 4 RCTs, 8 prospective observational studies, and 1 restrospective study. The number of patients who received HA gel on the glans penis was 706. According to the results of 2 placebo-controlled RCTs, HA gel treatment significantly improved IELT at the end of the first month (mean difference [MD], 65.44 seconds). In the first month after the HA gel injection procedure, IELT increased vs before the procedure (MD, 176.18 [95% CI, 146.89-205.48]; P < .001, I2 = 83%). When the IELT values were compared at 6 months after HA gel application, IELT improved vs before the procedure (MD, 143.93 [95% CI, 124.78-163.09]; P < .001, I2 = 82). The glans circumference expanded by approximately 1.5 cm after the procedure (MD, 14.82 mm [95% CI, 12.75-16.90]; P < .001, I2 = 65%). When the side effect profile of other studies was examined, side effects were observed in 91 patients after HA gel injection applied to 598 patients (15.22%). Among these side effects, the most common were pain (n = 46, 7.69%), bulla/nodule formation (n = 25, 4.18%), and ecchymosis (n = 20, 3.34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HA shows promise as a therapeutic option for PE, ongoing research is essential to elucidate its clinical utility, mechanisms of action, and comparative efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：近年来，人们对使用透明质酸（HA）治疗早泄（PE）越来越感兴趣。目的：本研究旨在评估使用 HA 凝胶增大龟头阴茎治疗早泄的有效性和安全性：本系统综述包括随机对照试验（RCT）、初级临床试验、前瞻性和回顾性研究、病例系列和病例报告。由两名审稿人在Embase、PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Knowledge和ClinicalTrials.gov中进行盲法检索：结果：阴道内射精潜伏时间（IELT）、PE问卷、龟头周长（毫米）和不良事件：结果：13 项研究被纳入评估：其中包括 4 项研究性临床试验、8 项前瞻性观察研究和 1 项回顾性研究。在阴茎龟头上涂抹 HA 凝胶的患者人数为 706 人。根据两项安慰剂对照研究的结果，HA凝胶治疗在第一个月结束时明显改善了IELT（平均差[MD]，65.44秒）。在注射 HA 凝胶后的第一个月，IELT 与注射前相比有所增加（MD，176.18 [95% CI，146.89-205.48]；P < .001，I2 = 83%）。在使用 HA 凝胶 6 个月后比较 IELT 值，IELT 与术前相比有所提高（MD，143.93 [95% CI，124.78-163.09]；P < .001，I2 = 82）。术后龟头周长扩大了约 1.5 厘米（MD，14.82 毫米 [95% CI，12.75-16.90]；P < .001，I2 = 65%）。在检查其他研究的副作用时发现，598 名患者（15.22%）注射 HA 凝胶后，有 91 名患者出现了副作用。在这些副作用中，最常见的是疼痛（46 例，7.69%）、肿块/结节形成（25 例，4.18%）和瘀斑（20 例，3.34%）：结论：虽然HA有望成为治疗PE的一种选择，但要阐明其临床用途、作用机制和比较疗效，仍需进行持续研究。
Clinical efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid gel injection in the glans penis for treatment of premature ejaculation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). The efficacy of this treatment is quite controversial.
Aim: This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glans penis augmentation with HA gel for PE.
Methods: This systematic review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), primary clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, case series, and case reports. Searches in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed blindly by 2 reviewers.
Outcomes: Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), questionnaires about PE, glans circumference (millimeters), and adverse events.
Results: Thirteen studies were included in the evaluation: 4 RCTs, 8 prospective observational studies, and 1 restrospective study. The number of patients who received HA gel on the glans penis was 706. According to the results of 2 placebo-controlled RCTs, HA gel treatment significantly improved IELT at the end of the first month (mean difference [MD], 65.44 seconds). In the first month after the HA gel injection procedure, IELT increased vs before the procedure (MD, 176.18 [95% CI, 146.89-205.48]; P < .001, I2 = 83%). When the IELT values were compared at 6 months after HA gel application, IELT improved vs before the procedure (MD, 143.93 [95% CI, 124.78-163.09]; P < .001, I2 = 82). The glans circumference expanded by approximately 1.5 cm after the procedure (MD, 14.82 mm [95% CI, 12.75-16.90]; P < .001, I2 = 65%). When the side effect profile of other studies was examined, side effects were observed in 91 patients after HA gel injection applied to 598 patients (15.22%). Among these side effects, the most common were pain (n = 46, 7.69%), bulla/nodule formation (n = 25, 4.18%), and ecchymosis (n = 20, 3.34%).
Conclusion: While HA shows promise as a therapeutic option for PE, ongoing research is essential to elucidate its clinical utility, mechanisms of action, and comparative efficacy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
