办公室蓝激光疗法与铥激光疗法治疗莱因克氏水肿的对比。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Jad Hosri, Christophe Abi Zeid Daou, Yara Yammine, Lana Ghzayel, Nader Nawfal, Robert T Sataloff
{"title":"办公室蓝激光疗法与铥激光疗法治疗莱因克氏水肿的对比。","authors":"Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Jad Hosri, Christophe Abi Zeid Daou, Yara Yammine, Lana Ghzayel, Nader Nawfal, Robert T Sataloff","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the treatment outcomes of patients with Reinke's edema (RE) who were treated in-office using the blue laser vs those treated in-office using the thulium laser.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records and video recordings of patients who underwent office-based thulium laser therapy for RE between November 2018 and July 2019, and office-based blue laser therapy for RE between November 2023 and March 2024 in a tertiary referral center were reviewed. The primary outcome measures used in this study were the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) score and disease regression based on the laryngeal examination performed before and after therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were included in this study. They were divided into 2 subgroups, 12 patients with 22 lesions who underwent office-based thulium therapy and 10 patients with 17 lesions who underwent office-based blue laser therapy. There was no significant difference in the decrease in the mean VHI-10 score following surgery between those treated with the thulium laser vs those treated with the blue laser (10.5 ± 13.15 vs 8.2 ± 5.98, P = 0.657). Nine out of 22 lesions (40.9%) treated with thulium laser regressed completely compared to 9 out of 17 lesions (52.9%) treated with a blue laser. The difference in disease regression between the two subgroups was not statistically significant (P = 0.455).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blue laser and thulium laser can be used interchangeably in-office for the treatment of RE with no significant difference in patient self-perceived improvement in voice quality and disease regression. A larger study using objective measures is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Office-Based Blue Laser Therapy vs Thulium Laser Therapy for Reinke's Edema.\",\"authors\":\"Abdul-Latif Hamdan, Jad Hosri, Christophe Abi Zeid Daou, Yara Yammine, Lana Ghzayel, Nader Nawfal, Robert T Sataloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the treatment outcomes of patients with Reinke's edema (RE) who were treated in-office using the blue laser vs those treated in-office using the thulium laser.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records and video recordings of patients who underwent office-based thulium laser therapy for RE between November 2018 and July 2019, and office-based blue laser therapy for RE between November 2023 and March 2024 in a tertiary referral center were reviewed. The primary outcome measures used in this study were the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) score and disease regression based on the laryngeal examination performed before and after therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were included in this study. They were divided into 2 subgroups, 12 patients with 22 lesions who underwent office-based thulium therapy and 10 patients with 17 lesions who underwent office-based blue laser therapy. There was no significant difference in the decrease in the mean VHI-10 score following surgery between those treated with the thulium laser vs those treated with the blue laser (10.5 ± 13.15 vs 8.2 ± 5.98, P = 0.657). Nine out of 22 lesions (40.9%) treated with thulium laser regressed completely compared to 9 out of 17 lesions (52.9%) treated with a blue laser. The difference in disease regression between the two subgroups was not statistically significant (P = 0.455).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blue laser and thulium laser can be used interchangeably in-office for the treatment of RE with no significant difference in patient self-perceived improvement in voice quality and disease regression. A larger study using objective measures is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的比较莱因克氏水肿(RE)患者在诊室接受蓝激光治疗与在诊室接受铥激光治疗的疗效:研究设计:回顾性病例对照研究:回顾性分析2018年11月至2019年7月期间在一家三级转诊中心接受诊室铥激光治疗RE的患者病历和录像,以及2023年11月至2024年3月期间接受诊室蓝激光治疗RE的患者病历和录像。本研究采用的主要结果指标是嗓音障碍指数-10(VHI-10)评分和根据治疗前后进行的喉部检查得出的疾病消退情况:本研究共纳入22名患者。他们被分为两个亚组,12 名患者(22 个病灶)接受了诊室铥激光治疗,10 名患者(17 个病灶)接受了诊室蓝激光治疗。接受铥激光治疗的患者与接受蓝激光治疗的患者在术后平均 VHI-10 评分的下降幅度上没有明显差异(10.5 ± 13.15 vs 8.2 ± 5.98,P = 0.657)。用铥激光治疗的 22 个病灶中有 9 个(40.9%)完全消退,而用蓝激光治疗的 17 个病灶中有 9 个(52.9%)完全消退。两个亚组在疾病消退方面的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.455):结论:蓝激光和铥激光可在诊室交替使用,用于治疗RE,患者自我感觉嗓音质量的改善和疾病的消退无明显差异。有必要使用客观测量方法进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Office-Based Blue Laser Therapy vs Thulium Laser Therapy for Reinke's Edema.

Objective: To compare the treatment outcomes of patients with Reinke's edema (RE) who were treated in-office using the blue laser vs those treated in-office using the thulium laser.

Study design: Retrospective case-control study.

Methods: The medical records and video recordings of patients who underwent office-based thulium laser therapy for RE between November 2018 and July 2019, and office-based blue laser therapy for RE between November 2023 and March 2024 in a tertiary referral center were reviewed. The primary outcome measures used in this study were the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) score and disease regression based on the laryngeal examination performed before and after therapy.

Results: Twenty-two patients were included in this study. They were divided into 2 subgroups, 12 patients with 22 lesions who underwent office-based thulium therapy and 10 patients with 17 lesions who underwent office-based blue laser therapy. There was no significant difference in the decrease in the mean VHI-10 score following surgery between those treated with the thulium laser vs those treated with the blue laser (10.5 ± 13.15 vs 8.2 ± 5.98, P = 0.657). Nine out of 22 lesions (40.9%) treated with thulium laser regressed completely compared to 9 out of 17 lesions (52.9%) treated with a blue laser. The difference in disease regression between the two subgroups was not statistically significant (P = 0.455).

Conclusions: Blue laser and thulium laser can be used interchangeably in-office for the treatment of RE with no significant difference in patient self-perceived improvement in voice quality and disease regression. A larger study using objective measures is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信