在微创青光眼手术研究中报告临床终点。

IF 13.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Steven J Gedde, Kateki Vinod, Eileen C Bowden, Natasha N Kolomeyer, Vikas Chopra, Pratap Challa, Donald L Budenz, Michael X Repka, Flora Lum
{"title":"在微创青光眼手术研究中报告临床终点。","authors":"Steven J Gedde, Kateki Vinod, Eileen C Bowden, Natasha N Kolomeyer, Vikas Chopra, Pratap Challa, Donald L Budenz, Michael X Repka, Flora Lum","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.07.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) refers to a group of procedures generally characterized by an ab interno approach, minimal trauma to ocular tissue, moderate efficacy, an excellent safety profile, and rapid recovery. The number of MIGS procedures continues to increase, and their use has become widespread among glaucoma and cataract specialists. Standardization of the methodology and reporting of clinical endpoints in MIGS investigations enhances interpretation and comparison across different studies. The assessment of surgical interventions should not only consider statistical significance, but also whether the outcome is meaningful to patients. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest change in a treatment outcome that is considered beneficial for an individual patient and prompts a change in their clinical management, and expert consensus is an accepted approach to determine the MCID. The American Academy of Ophthalmology's Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern Panel is an expert panel that develops guidelines identifying characteristics and components of quality eye care. The panel recommends that the cumulative probability of surgical success at 2 years with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis be used as the primary efficacy endpoint in MIGS studies. The panel suggests that surgical success for standalone MIGS be defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The proposed MCID for the cumulative probability of success of standalone MIGS at 2 years is 50%. The panel recommends that surgical success for MIGS combined with cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CE-IOL) be defined as a decrease in glaucoma medical therapy ≥ 1 medication from baseline without an increase in IOP, or IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The suggested MCID for the cumulative probability of success for CE-IOL/MIGS at 2 years is 65%.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting Clinical Endpoints in Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Steven J Gedde, Kateki Vinod, Eileen C Bowden, Natasha N Kolomeyer, Vikas Chopra, Pratap Challa, Donald L Budenz, Michael X Repka, Flora Lum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.07.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) refers to a group of procedures generally characterized by an ab interno approach, minimal trauma to ocular tissue, moderate efficacy, an excellent safety profile, and rapid recovery. The number of MIGS procedures continues to increase, and their use has become widespread among glaucoma and cataract specialists. Standardization of the methodology and reporting of clinical endpoints in MIGS investigations enhances interpretation and comparison across different studies. The assessment of surgical interventions should not only consider statistical significance, but also whether the outcome is meaningful to patients. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest change in a treatment outcome that is considered beneficial for an individual patient and prompts a change in their clinical management, and expert consensus is an accepted approach to determine the MCID. The American Academy of Ophthalmology's Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern Panel is an expert panel that develops guidelines identifying characteristics and components of quality eye care. The panel recommends that the cumulative probability of surgical success at 2 years with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis be used as the primary efficacy endpoint in MIGS studies. The panel suggests that surgical success for standalone MIGS be defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The proposed MCID for the cumulative probability of success of standalone MIGS at 2 years is 50%. The panel recommends that surgical success for MIGS combined with cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CE-IOL) be defined as a decrease in glaucoma medical therapy ≥ 1 medication from baseline without an increase in IOP, or IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The suggested MCID for the cumulative probability of success for CE-IOL/MIGS at 2 years is 65%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.07.030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.07.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微创青光眼手术(MIGS)指的是一组手术,其一般特点是采用室内方法,对眼部组织的创伤最小,疗效适中,安全性高,恢复迅速。MIGS 手术的数量不断增加,在青光眼和白内障专科医生中已得到广泛应用。MIGS 研究方法和临床终点报告的标准化有助于不同研究之间的解释和比较。手术干预的评估不仅要考虑统计意义,还要考虑结果是否对患者有意义。最小临床意义差异(MCID)被定义为治疗结果中对个体患者有益并促使其改变临床管理的最小变化,专家共识是确定 MCID 的公认方法。美国眼科学会青光眼首选实践模式小组是一个专家小组,负责制定指导方针,确定优质眼科护理的特征和组成部分。该小组建议,在 MIGS 研究中,使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析法将 2 年后手术成功的累积概率作为主要疗效终点。专家小组建议,独立 MIGS 的手术成功定义为眼压 (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg 且比基线降低≥ 20%,且未增加青光眼药物、未进行额外的激光或切口青光眼手术、未丧失光感视力或眼睑下垂。建议独立 MIGS 2 年的累积成功概率 MCID 为 50%。专家小组建议,MIGS 联合白内障摘除术与眼内人工晶体植入术(CE-IOL)的手术成功定义为:青光眼药物治疗比基线减少≥ 1 种药物且眼压未增加,或眼压≤ 21 mmHg 且比基线减少≥ 20%,且未增加青光眼药物、额外的激光或切口青光眼手术、光感视力丧失或眼压过低。CE-IOL/MIGS 2 年的累积成功概率的建议 MCID 为 65%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reporting Clinical Endpoints in Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) refers to a group of procedures generally characterized by an ab interno approach, minimal trauma to ocular tissue, moderate efficacy, an excellent safety profile, and rapid recovery. The number of MIGS procedures continues to increase, and their use has become widespread among glaucoma and cataract specialists. Standardization of the methodology and reporting of clinical endpoints in MIGS investigations enhances interpretation and comparison across different studies. The assessment of surgical interventions should not only consider statistical significance, but also whether the outcome is meaningful to patients. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest change in a treatment outcome that is considered beneficial for an individual patient and prompts a change in their clinical management, and expert consensus is an accepted approach to determine the MCID. The American Academy of Ophthalmology's Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern Panel is an expert panel that develops guidelines identifying characteristics and components of quality eye care. The panel recommends that the cumulative probability of surgical success at 2 years with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis be used as the primary efficacy endpoint in MIGS studies. The panel suggests that surgical success for standalone MIGS be defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The proposed MCID for the cumulative probability of success of standalone MIGS at 2 years is 50%. The panel recommends that surgical success for MIGS combined with cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CE-IOL) be defined as a decrease in glaucoma medical therapy ≥ 1 medication from baseline without an increase in IOP, or IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The suggested MCID for the cumulative probability of success for CE-IOL/MIGS at 2 years is 65%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信