对因严重自残而广泛住院的患者的医疗服务和治疗联盟进行评估--极端挑战项目的结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2024.2376162
Tuva Langjord, Geir Pedersen, Tone Bovim, Kjetil Bremer, Tore Buer Christensen, Oddbjørn Hove, Arvid Nikolai Kildahl, Erlend Mork, Astrid Berge Norheim, Ruth-Kari Ramleth, Kristin Lie Romm, Johan Siqveland, Thea Schønning, Line Indrevoll Stänicke, Terje Torgersen, Mona S Pettersen, Tone Tveit, Øyvind Urnes, Fredrik A Walby, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein
{"title":"对因严重自残而广泛住院的患者的医疗服务和治疗联盟进行评估--极端挑战项目的结果。","authors":"Tuva Langjord, Geir Pedersen, Tone Bovim, Kjetil Bremer, Tore Buer Christensen, Oddbjørn Hove, Arvid Nikolai Kildahl, Erlend Mork, Astrid Berge Norheim, Ruth-Kari Ramleth, Kristin Lie Romm, Johan Siqveland, Thea Schønning, Line Indrevoll Stänicke, Terje Torgersen, Mona S Pettersen, Tone Tveit, Øyvind Urnes, Fredrik A Walby, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2376162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extensive psychiatric hospitalization due to repeated severe self-harm (SH), is a poorly researched area, but a challenge within health services (HS). Recent studies have demonstrated high levels of involuntary treatment among patients with severe personality disorder (PD) and complex comorbidity. Keeping focus on extensively hospitalized SH patients, this study aimed to investigate patients' and clinicians' evaluation of HS and treatment alliance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study with an inpatient sample (age >18 years) with frequent (>5) or long (>4 weeks) psychiatric hospital admissions last year due to SH or SA recruited from 12 hospitals across health regions (<i>N</i> = 42). Evaluation included patient and clinician report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A minority of the patients (14%) were satisfied with HS before the current admission, 45% (patients) and 20% (clinicians) found the current admission helpful, and 46% (patients) and 14% (clinicians) worried about discharge. Treatment complaints were received in 38% of the cases. Outpatient mental HS were available after discharge for 68% and a majority of clinicians indicated satisfactory contact across HS. More intensive or specialized formats were unusual (structured outpatient treatment 35%, day treatment 21%, ambulatory services 32%, planned inpatient services 31%). Mutual problem understanding, aims, and confidence in therapists during the hospital stay were limited (patient-rated satisfactory mutual problem understanding: 39%, aims of stay: 50%, confidence: 50%). Patient and therapist alliance-ratings were in concordance for the majority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights poor HS satisfaction, poor patient-therapist coherence, limited treatment alliance and limited follow-up in structured treatments addressing SH or intermediary supportive ambulatory/day/inpatient services.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"591-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of health services and treatment alliance among extensively hospitalized patients due to severe self-harm - results from the Extreme Challenges project.\",\"authors\":\"Tuva Langjord, Geir Pedersen, Tone Bovim, Kjetil Bremer, Tore Buer Christensen, Oddbjørn Hove, Arvid Nikolai Kildahl, Erlend Mork, Astrid Berge Norheim, Ruth-Kari Ramleth, Kristin Lie Romm, Johan Siqveland, Thea Schønning, Line Indrevoll Stänicke, Terje Torgersen, Mona S Pettersen, Tone Tveit, Øyvind Urnes, Fredrik A Walby, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039488.2024.2376162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extensive psychiatric hospitalization due to repeated severe self-harm (SH), is a poorly researched area, but a challenge within health services (HS). Recent studies have demonstrated high levels of involuntary treatment among patients with severe personality disorder (PD) and complex comorbidity. Keeping focus on extensively hospitalized SH patients, this study aimed to investigate patients' and clinicians' evaluation of HS and treatment alliance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study with an inpatient sample (age >18 years) with frequent (>5) or long (>4 weeks) psychiatric hospital admissions last year due to SH or SA recruited from 12 hospitals across health regions (<i>N</i> = 42). Evaluation included patient and clinician report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A minority of the patients (14%) were satisfied with HS before the current admission, 45% (patients) and 20% (clinicians) found the current admission helpful, and 46% (patients) and 14% (clinicians) worried about discharge. Treatment complaints were received in 38% of the cases. Outpatient mental HS were available after discharge for 68% and a majority of clinicians indicated satisfactory contact across HS. More intensive or specialized formats were unusual (structured outpatient treatment 35%, day treatment 21%, ambulatory services 32%, planned inpatient services 31%). Mutual problem understanding, aims, and confidence in therapists during the hospital stay were limited (patient-rated satisfactory mutual problem understanding: 39%, aims of stay: 50%, confidence: 50%). Patient and therapist alliance-ratings were in concordance for the majority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights poor HS satisfaction, poor patient-therapist coherence, limited treatment alliance and limited follow-up in structured treatments addressing SH or intermediary supportive ambulatory/day/inpatient services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"591-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2376162\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2376162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:因反复严重自残(SH)而被送入精神病院的患者人数众多,但这一领域的研究却很少,这也是医疗服务(HS)中的一项挑战。最近的研究表明,患有严重人格障碍(PD)和复杂合并症的患者接受非自愿治疗的比例很高。本研究以广泛住院的严重人格障碍患者为重点,旨在调查患者和临床医生对 HS 和治疗联盟的评价:方法:横断面研究,以去年因SH或SA而频繁(>5次)或长期(>4周)入院的住院病人(年龄大于18岁)为样本,这些病人来自12个卫生保健区的医院(N = 42)。评估包括患者和临床医生的报告:少数患者(14%)对本次入院前的 HS 表示满意,45%(患者)和 20%(临床医生)认为本次入院对其有帮助,46%(患者)和 14%(临床医生)对出院感到担忧。38%的病例收到了治疗投诉。68% 的患者在出院后可以接受门诊心理 HS 治疗,大多数临床医生表示与各心理 HS 的联系令人满意。更密集或更专业的形式并不常见(结构化门诊治疗 35%,日间治疗 21%,流动服务 32%,计划住院服务 31%)。住院期间对问题的相互理解、目的以及对治疗师的信心都很有限(患者对问题相互理解的满意度:39%;住院目的:50%):39%,住院目的:50%,信心:50%):50%).大多数患者和治疗师的联盟评分是一致的:研究结果表明,在针对 SH 或中间支持性门诊/日间/住院服务的结构化治疗中,HS 的满意度较低,患者与治疗师的一致性较差,治疗联盟有限,随访有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of health services and treatment alliance among extensively hospitalized patients due to severe self-harm - results from the Extreme Challenges project.

Background: Extensive psychiatric hospitalization due to repeated severe self-harm (SH), is a poorly researched area, but a challenge within health services (HS). Recent studies have demonstrated high levels of involuntary treatment among patients with severe personality disorder (PD) and complex comorbidity. Keeping focus on extensively hospitalized SH patients, this study aimed to investigate patients' and clinicians' evaluation of HS and treatment alliance.

Method: A cross-sectional study with an inpatient sample (age >18 years) with frequent (>5) or long (>4 weeks) psychiatric hospital admissions last year due to SH or SA recruited from 12 hospitals across health regions (N = 42). Evaluation included patient and clinician report.

Results: A minority of the patients (14%) were satisfied with HS before the current admission, 45% (patients) and 20% (clinicians) found the current admission helpful, and 46% (patients) and 14% (clinicians) worried about discharge. Treatment complaints were received in 38% of the cases. Outpatient mental HS were available after discharge for 68% and a majority of clinicians indicated satisfactory contact across HS. More intensive or specialized formats were unusual (structured outpatient treatment 35%, day treatment 21%, ambulatory services 32%, planned inpatient services 31%). Mutual problem understanding, aims, and confidence in therapists during the hospital stay were limited (patient-rated satisfactory mutual problem understanding: 39%, aims of stay: 50%, confidence: 50%). Patient and therapist alliance-ratings were in concordance for the majority.

Conclusion: The study highlights poor HS satisfaction, poor patient-therapist coherence, limited treatment alliance and limited follow-up in structured treatments addressing SH or intermediary supportive ambulatory/day/inpatient services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信