疼痛性脊柱转移瘤的立体定向体放射治疗:一家医疗机构的十年经验。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-08-09 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231326
Kuan-Nien Chou, David J Park, Yusuke S Hori, Amit R Persad, Cynthia F Chuang, Sara C Emrich, Louisa Ustrzynski, Armine Tayag, Kiran A Kumar, Melissa Usoz, Maria Mendoza, Elham Rahimy, Erqi Pollom, Scott G Soltys, Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Steven D Chang
{"title":"疼痛性脊柱转移瘤的立体定向体放射治疗:一家医疗机构的十年经验。","authors":"Kuan-Nien Chou, David J Park, Yusuke S Hori, Amit R Persad, Cynthia F Chuang, Sara C Emrich, Louisa Ustrzynski, Armine Tayag, Kiran A Kumar, Melissa Usoz, Maria Mendoza, Elham Rahimy, Erqi Pollom, Scott G Soltys, Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Steven D Chang","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pain relief in patients with painful spinal bone metastases (SBMs) and to identify key factors contributing to treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent SBRT for painful solid tumor SBMs between March 2012 and January 2023. During this period, SBRT was performed adhering to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations for target volume delineation. To be included, patients needed to experience persistent pain directly associated with SBMs, warranting regular opioid treatment. Positive pain relief post-SBRT was defined by three criteria: 1) a decrease in the severity of pain; 2) reduction in opioid dosage; and 3) concurrent improvement in daily activities. The revised Tokuhashi score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score were used to identify crucial factors influencing treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 377 patients, covering 576 lesions across 759 vertebrae. Of these, 332 lesions showed significant pain relief within 3 months following SBRT. Lower pain relief rates were observed in patients with a revised Tokuhashi score of 0-8 or in patients with diabetes mellitus. In contrast, higher relief rates were linked to treating a single painful SBM in 1 SBRT course, and greater contouring of the involved sectors according to International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations. The highest pain relief rate was observed in patients with prostate cancer (73.8%), whereas the lowest rate was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (36.4%). The presence of pre-SBRT vertebral fractures, the dosage and fraction of SBRT, and the use of concurrent systemic cancer therapies or antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, did not notably influence the pain relief efficacy of SBRT. Comprehensive medical records 6 months after SBRT treatment were available for only 362 lesions. The overall rate of pain relief observed was 32.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT is an effective treatment approach for managing painful SBMs, achieving a pain relief rate of 57.6% within 3 months and maintaining a rate of 32.6% at 6 months after treatment. The transition to osteoblastic lesions may potentially improve the stability of SBMs, indicated by lower Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, which in turn could extend pain relief management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"532-540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases: a decade of experience at a single institution.\",\"authors\":\"Kuan-Nien Chou, David J Park, Yusuke S Hori, Amit R Persad, Cynthia F Chuang, Sara C Emrich, Louisa Ustrzynski, Armine Tayag, Kiran A Kumar, Melissa Usoz, Maria Mendoza, Elham Rahimy, Erqi Pollom, Scott G Soltys, Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Steven D Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pain relief in patients with painful spinal bone metastases (SBMs) and to identify key factors contributing to treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent SBRT for painful solid tumor SBMs between March 2012 and January 2023. During this period, SBRT was performed adhering to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations for target volume delineation. To be included, patients needed to experience persistent pain directly associated with SBMs, warranting regular opioid treatment. Positive pain relief post-SBRT was defined by three criteria: 1) a decrease in the severity of pain; 2) reduction in opioid dosage; and 3) concurrent improvement in daily activities. The revised Tokuhashi score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score were used to identify crucial factors influencing treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 377 patients, covering 576 lesions across 759 vertebrae. Of these, 332 lesions showed significant pain relief within 3 months following SBRT. Lower pain relief rates were observed in patients with a revised Tokuhashi score of 0-8 or in patients with diabetes mellitus. In contrast, higher relief rates were linked to treating a single painful SBM in 1 SBRT course, and greater contouring of the involved sectors according to International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations. The highest pain relief rate was observed in patients with prostate cancer (73.8%), whereas the lowest rate was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (36.4%). The presence of pre-SBRT vertebral fractures, the dosage and fraction of SBRT, and the use of concurrent systemic cancer therapies or antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, did not notably influence the pain relief efficacy of SBRT. Comprehensive medical records 6 months after SBRT treatment were available for only 362 lesions. The overall rate of pain relief observed was 32.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT is an effective treatment approach for managing painful SBMs, achieving a pain relief rate of 57.6% within 3 months and maintaining a rate of 32.6% at 6 months after treatment. The transition to osteoblastic lesions may potentially improve the stability of SBMs, indicated by lower Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, which in turn could extend pain relief management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"532-540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在回顾性评估立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)在缓解疼痛性脊柱骨转移瘤(SBMs)患者疼痛方面的疗效,并找出影响治疗效果的关键因素:作者对2012年3月至2023年1月期间接受SBRT治疗疼痛性实体瘤SBM的成年患者进行了回顾性分析。在此期间,SBRT 遵循国际脊柱放射外科联盟指南和国际共识建议进行靶区划分。患者需要经历与 SBM 直接相关的持续性疼痛,并需要定期接受阿片类药物治疗,方可纳入研究。SBRT术后疼痛缓解的标准有三个:1) 疼痛严重程度减轻;2) 阿片类药物用量减少;3) 日常活动同时得到改善。修订版德桥评分和脊柱不稳定性肿瘤评分用于确定影响治疗结果的关键因素:本研究共纳入 377 名患者,涉及 759 个椎体的 576 个病灶。其中,332 个病灶在 SBRT 治疗后 3 个月内疼痛明显缓解。经修订的德桥评分为 0-8 分的患者或糖尿病患者的疼痛缓解率较低。相反,根据国际脊柱放射外科联盟指南和国际共识建议,在一个 SBRT 疗程中治疗单个疼痛的 SBM,以及对受累区域进行更大程度的轮廓整形,则可获得更高的疼痛缓解率。前列腺癌患者的疼痛缓解率最高(73.8%),而肝细胞癌患者的疼痛缓解率最低(36.4%)。SBRT前是否存在椎体骨折、SBRT的剂量和分量、是否同时使用全身性癌症疗法或抗骨质吸收药物(包括双膦酸盐和地诺单抗)对SBRT的止痛效果没有明显影响。SBRT治疗后6个月的综合医疗记录仅适用于362个病灶。观察到的总体疼痛缓解率为32.6%:SBRT是治疗疼痛性SBM的有效方法,3个月内疼痛缓解率达到57.6%,治疗6个月后疼痛缓解率保持在32.6%。脊柱不稳定性肿瘤评分的降低表明,向成骨细胞病变的过渡可能会改善SBM的稳定性,这反过来又会延长疼痛缓解期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases: a decade of experience at a single institution.

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pain relief in patients with painful spinal bone metastases (SBMs) and to identify key factors contributing to treatment outcomes.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent SBRT for painful solid tumor SBMs between March 2012 and January 2023. During this period, SBRT was performed adhering to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations for target volume delineation. To be included, patients needed to experience persistent pain directly associated with SBMs, warranting regular opioid treatment. Positive pain relief post-SBRT was defined by three criteria: 1) a decrease in the severity of pain; 2) reduction in opioid dosage; and 3) concurrent improvement in daily activities. The revised Tokuhashi score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score were used to identify crucial factors influencing treatment outcomes.

Results: This study included 377 patients, covering 576 lesions across 759 vertebrae. Of these, 332 lesions showed significant pain relief within 3 months following SBRT. Lower pain relief rates were observed in patients with a revised Tokuhashi score of 0-8 or in patients with diabetes mellitus. In contrast, higher relief rates were linked to treating a single painful SBM in 1 SBRT course, and greater contouring of the involved sectors according to International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations. The highest pain relief rate was observed in patients with prostate cancer (73.8%), whereas the lowest rate was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (36.4%). The presence of pre-SBRT vertebral fractures, the dosage and fraction of SBRT, and the use of concurrent systemic cancer therapies or antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, did not notably influence the pain relief efficacy of SBRT. Comprehensive medical records 6 months after SBRT treatment were available for only 362 lesions. The overall rate of pain relief observed was 32.6%.

Conclusions: SBRT is an effective treatment approach for managing painful SBMs, achieving a pain relief rate of 57.6% within 3 months and maintaining a rate of 32.6% at 6 months after treatment. The transition to osteoblastic lesions may potentially improve the stability of SBMs, indicated by lower Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, which in turn could extend pain relief management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信