卷积神经网络肺结节检测软件的临床应用:澳大利亚一家四级医院的经验。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peter Mark, Isabella Papalia, Jeffrey KC Lai, Diane M Pascoe
{"title":"卷积神经网络肺结节检测软件的临床应用:澳大利亚一家四级医院的经验。","authors":"Peter Mark,&nbsp;Isabella Papalia,&nbsp;Jeffrey KC Lai,&nbsp;Diane M Pascoe","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Early-stage lung cancer diagnosis through detection of nodules on computed tomography (CT) remains integral to patient survivorship, promoting national screening programmes and diagnostic tools using artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN); the software of AI-Rad Companion™ (AIRC), capable of self-optimising feature recognition. This study aims to demonstrate the practical value of AI-based lung nodule detection in a clinical setting; a limited body of research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and eighty-three non-contrast CT chest studies from a single centre were assessed for AIRC software analysis. Prospectively collected data from AIRC detection and characterisation of lung nodules (size: ≥3 mm) were assessed against the reference standard; reported findings of a blinded consultant radiologist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and sixty-seven CT chest studies were included; 52% indicated for nodule or lung cancer surveillance. Of 289 lung nodules, 219 (75.8%) nodules (mean size: 10.1 mm) were detected by both modalities, 28 (9.7%) were detected by AIRC alone and 42 (14.5%) by radiologist alone. Solid nodules missed by AIRC were larger than those missed by radiologist (11.5 mm vs 4.7 mm, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). AIRC software sensitivity was 87.3%, with significant false positive and negative rates demonstrating 12.5% specificity (PPV 0.6, NPV 0.4).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In a population of high nodule prevalence, AIRC lung nodule detection software demonstrates sensitivity comparable to that of consultant radiologist. The clinical significance of larger sized nodules missed by AIRC software presents a barrier to current integration in practice. We consider this research highly relevant in providing focus for ongoing software development, potentiating the future success of AI-based tools within diagnostic radiology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 6","pages":"659-666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of convolutional neural network lung nodule detection software: An Australian quaternary hospital experience\",\"authors\":\"Peter Mark,&nbsp;Isabella Papalia,&nbsp;Jeffrey KC Lai,&nbsp;Diane M Pascoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Early-stage lung cancer diagnosis through detection of nodules on computed tomography (CT) remains integral to patient survivorship, promoting national screening programmes and diagnostic tools using artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN); the software of AI-Rad Companion™ (AIRC), capable of self-optimising feature recognition. This study aims to demonstrate the practical value of AI-based lung nodule detection in a clinical setting; a limited body of research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred and eighty-three non-contrast CT chest studies from a single centre were assessed for AIRC software analysis. Prospectively collected data from AIRC detection and characterisation of lung nodules (size: ≥3 mm) were assessed against the reference standard; reported findings of a blinded consultant radiologist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred and sixty-seven CT chest studies were included; 52% indicated for nodule or lung cancer surveillance. Of 289 lung nodules, 219 (75.8%) nodules (mean size: 10.1 mm) were detected by both modalities, 28 (9.7%) were detected by AIRC alone and 42 (14.5%) by radiologist alone. Solid nodules missed by AIRC were larger than those missed by radiologist (11.5 mm vs 4.7 mm, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). AIRC software sensitivity was 87.3%, with significant false positive and negative rates demonstrating 12.5% specificity (PPV 0.6, NPV 0.4).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a population of high nodule prevalence, AIRC lung nodule detection software demonstrates sensitivity comparable to that of consultant radiologist. The clinical significance of larger sized nodules missed by AIRC software presents a barrier to current integration in practice. We consider this research highly relevant in providing focus for ongoing software development, potentiating the future success of AI-based tools within diagnostic radiology.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 6\",\"pages\":\"659-666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13734\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:通过检测计算机断层扫描(CT)上的结节进行早期肺癌诊断仍然是患者生存不可或缺的一部分,促进了国家筛查计划和使用人工智能(AI)卷积神经网络(CNN)的诊断工具;AI-Rad Companion™(AIRC)软件能够自我优化特征识别。本研究旨在证明基于人工智能的肺结节检测在临床环境中的实用价值;这是一项有限的研究:方法:对来自一个中心的 183 例非对比 CT 胸部研究进行评估,并对 AIRC 软件进行分析。对照参考标准(由盲人放射科顾问医生报告的结果)对 AIRC 检测和肺结节特征(大小:≥3 毫米)的前瞻性收集数据进行评估:结果:共纳入 167 项胸部 CT 研究,其中 52% 用于结节或肺癌监测。在 289 个肺部结节中,219 个(75.8%)结节(平均大小:10.1 毫米)由两种方式检测到,28 个(9.7%)由 AIRC 单独检测到,42 个(14.5%)由放射科医师单独检测到。AIRC 漏检的实性结节比放射科医生漏检的结节要大(11.5 毫米对 4.7 毫米,P 结论:AIRC 和放射科医生漏检的实性结节都比放射科医生漏检的结节要大:在结节高发人群中,AIRC 肺结节检测软件的灵敏度可与放射科顾问医生媲美。AIRC 软件漏检的较大尺寸结节的临床意义阻碍了该软件在实践中的应用。我们认为这项研究非常有意义,它为正在进行的软件开发提供了重点,为未来基于人工智能的工具在放射诊断领域取得成功提供了可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical application of convolutional neural network lung nodule detection software: An Australian quaternary hospital experience

Introduction

Early-stage lung cancer diagnosis through detection of nodules on computed tomography (CT) remains integral to patient survivorship, promoting national screening programmes and diagnostic tools using artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN); the software of AI-Rad Companion™ (AIRC), capable of self-optimising feature recognition. This study aims to demonstrate the practical value of AI-based lung nodule detection in a clinical setting; a limited body of research.

Methods

One hundred and eighty-three non-contrast CT chest studies from a single centre were assessed for AIRC software analysis. Prospectively collected data from AIRC detection and characterisation of lung nodules (size: ≥3 mm) were assessed against the reference standard; reported findings of a blinded consultant radiologist.

Results

One hundred and sixty-seven CT chest studies were included; 52% indicated for nodule or lung cancer surveillance. Of 289 lung nodules, 219 (75.8%) nodules (mean size: 10.1 mm) were detected by both modalities, 28 (9.7%) were detected by AIRC alone and 42 (14.5%) by radiologist alone. Solid nodules missed by AIRC were larger than those missed by radiologist (11.5 mm vs 4.7 mm, P < 0.001). AIRC software sensitivity was 87.3%, with significant false positive and negative rates demonstrating 12.5% specificity (PPV 0.6, NPV 0.4).

Conclusion

In a population of high nodule prevalence, AIRC lung nodule detection software demonstrates sensitivity comparable to that of consultant radiologist. The clinical significance of larger sized nodules missed by AIRC software presents a barrier to current integration in practice. We consider this research highly relevant in providing focus for ongoing software development, potentiating the future success of AI-based tools within diagnostic radiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信