{"title":"不同品牌阿苯达唑栓剂的溶解曲线建模与比较。","authors":"Yesuneh Tefera Mekasha, Abibo Wondie Mekonen, Sete Nigussie, Rashed Edris Usure, Melaku Getahun Feleke","doi":"10.1186/s40360-024-00774-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing critical veterinary drugs, especially drugs with solubility problems like albendazole, and their implications for therapeutic efficacy, in-vitro dissolution studies can indeed provide valuable insights into how different brands of albendazole boluses perform under standardized conditions, helping to assess their dissolution profiles and potential bioavailability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six brands of albendazole 300 mg boluses were collected from December 2020 to May 2021 G.C. The laboratory work was conducted from December 2020 to May 2021 in the National Animal Products and Veterinary Drugs and Feed Quality Assessment Centre (APVD-FQAC) laboratories. The collected brands from government veterinary clinics and private veterinary shops were subjected to model independent and dependent parameters. The dissolution test was conducted according to the USP monograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that none of the six brands met the requirements of the dissolution test, as their API release was less than 80% within the specified 60-minute timeframe according to USP standards. Model independence indicated that only one brand (Alb002 = 3.72) achieved a difference factor of ≤ 15%. The remaining four brands (4/6) did not meet this criterion. However, the similarity factor (f2) revealed that all five brands (5/6) were comparable to the comparator products, with f2 values of [Formula: see text]50%. The mean dissolution time results confirmed that three brands (3/6) had the highest dissolution rate and the fastest onset of action. The model-dependent kinetics indicated that the Weibull and Korsemeyer-Peppas models were the best fit for the release of drug substances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights issues with albendazole boluses' quality, highlighting the need for national in-vitro dissolution studies. These recommendations could improve quality control, streamline regulatory frameworks, and offer practical, cost-effective methods for evaluating drug efficacy and safety, ensuring veterinary pharmaceuticals meet safety and efficacy standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles for different brands of albendazole boluses.\",\"authors\":\"Yesuneh Tefera Mekasha, Abibo Wondie Mekonen, Sete Nigussie, Rashed Edris Usure, Melaku Getahun Feleke\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40360-024-00774-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing critical veterinary drugs, especially drugs with solubility problems like albendazole, and their implications for therapeutic efficacy, in-vitro dissolution studies can indeed provide valuable insights into how different brands of albendazole boluses perform under standardized conditions, helping to assess their dissolution profiles and potential bioavailability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six brands of albendazole 300 mg boluses were collected from December 2020 to May 2021 G.C. The laboratory work was conducted from December 2020 to May 2021 in the National Animal Products and Veterinary Drugs and Feed Quality Assessment Centre (APVD-FQAC) laboratories. The collected brands from government veterinary clinics and private veterinary shops were subjected to model independent and dependent parameters. The dissolution test was conducted according to the USP monograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that none of the six brands met the requirements of the dissolution test, as their API release was less than 80% within the specified 60-minute timeframe according to USP standards. Model independence indicated that only one brand (Alb002 = 3.72) achieved a difference factor of ≤ 15%. The remaining four brands (4/6) did not meet this criterion. However, the similarity factor (f2) revealed that all five brands (5/6) were comparable to the comparator products, with f2 values of [Formula: see text]50%. The mean dissolution time results confirmed that three brands (3/6) had the highest dissolution rate and the fastest onset of action. The model-dependent kinetics indicated that the Weibull and Korsemeyer-Peppas models were the best fit for the release of drug substances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights issues with albendazole boluses' quality, highlighting the need for national in-vitro dissolution studies. These recommendations could improve quality control, streamline regulatory frameworks, and offer practical, cost-effective methods for evaluating drug efficacy and safety, ensuring veterinary pharmaceuticals meet safety and efficacy standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00774-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00774-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles for different brands of albendazole boluses.
Background: Addressing critical veterinary drugs, especially drugs with solubility problems like albendazole, and their implications for therapeutic efficacy, in-vitro dissolution studies can indeed provide valuable insights into how different brands of albendazole boluses perform under standardized conditions, helping to assess their dissolution profiles and potential bioavailability.
Methods: Six brands of albendazole 300 mg boluses were collected from December 2020 to May 2021 G.C. The laboratory work was conducted from December 2020 to May 2021 in the National Animal Products and Veterinary Drugs and Feed Quality Assessment Centre (APVD-FQAC) laboratories. The collected brands from government veterinary clinics and private veterinary shops were subjected to model independent and dependent parameters. The dissolution test was conducted according to the USP monograph.
Results: The study found that none of the six brands met the requirements of the dissolution test, as their API release was less than 80% within the specified 60-minute timeframe according to USP standards. Model independence indicated that only one brand (Alb002 = 3.72) achieved a difference factor of ≤ 15%. The remaining four brands (4/6) did not meet this criterion. However, the similarity factor (f2) revealed that all five brands (5/6) were comparable to the comparator products, with f2 values of [Formula: see text]50%. The mean dissolution time results confirmed that three brands (3/6) had the highest dissolution rate and the fastest onset of action. The model-dependent kinetics indicated that the Weibull and Korsemeyer-Peppas models were the best fit for the release of drug substances.
Conclusion: The study highlights issues with albendazole boluses' quality, highlighting the need for national in-vitro dissolution studies. These recommendations could improve quality control, streamline regulatory frameworks, and offer practical, cost-effective methods for evaluating drug efficacy and safety, ensuring veterinary pharmaceuticals meet safety and efficacy standards.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.