COVID-19 患者的颅内顺应性:一项多中心观察研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788669
Ana Flávia Silveira, Marcella Barreto Santos, Nelci Zanon Collange, Cintya Yukie Hayashi, Gustavo Henrique Frigieri Vilela, Samantha Longhi Simões de Almeida, João Brainer Clares de Andrade, Salómon Rojas, Fabiano Moulin de Moraes, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Uri Adrian Prync Flato, Thiago Luiz Russo, Gisele Sampaio Silva
{"title":"COVID-19 患者的颅内顺应性:一项多中心观察研究。","authors":"Ana Flávia Silveira, Marcella Barreto Santos, Nelci Zanon Collange, Cintya Yukie Hayashi, Gustavo Henrique Frigieri Vilela, Samantha Longhi Simões de Almeida, João Brainer Clares de Andrade, Salómon Rojas, Fabiano Moulin de Moraes, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Uri Adrian Prync Flato, Thiago Luiz Russo, Gisele Sampaio Silva","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) may require the use of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for prolonged periods. Aggressive MV parameters have been associated with changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with acute intracranial disorders. Significant ICP elevation could compromise intracranial compliance (ICC) and cerebrovascular hemodynamics (CVH). However, the effects of these parameters in individuals without neurological disorders have not yet been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To evaluate ICC in patients on MV with COVID-19 infection compared to other diagnoses, to better characterize the effects of MV and COVID-19 upon ICC. We also compared between the ICC in patients with COVID-19 who did not require MV and healthy volunteers, to assess the isolated effect of COVID-19 upon ICC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was an exploratory, observational study with a convenience sample. The ICC was evaluated with a noninvasive ICP monitoring device. The P2/P1 ratio was calculated by dividing the amplitude of these two points, being defined as \"abnormal\" when P2 > P1. The statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with random effects to compare the P2/P1 ratio in all four groups on the first monitoring day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A convenience sample of 78 subjects (15 MV-COVID-19, 15 MV non-COVID-19, 24 non-MV-COVID-19, and 24 healthy participants) was prospectively enrolled. There was no difference in P2/P1 ratios between MV patients with and without COVID-19, nor between non-MV patients with COVID-19 and healthy volunteers. However, the P2/P1 ratio was higher in COVID-19 patients with MV use than in those without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This exploratory analysis suggests that COVID-19 does not impair ICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"82 9","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial compliance in patients with COVID-19: a multicenter observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Flávia Silveira, Marcella Barreto Santos, Nelci Zanon Collange, Cintya Yukie Hayashi, Gustavo Henrique Frigieri Vilela, Samantha Longhi Simões de Almeida, João Brainer Clares de Andrade, Salómon Rojas, Fabiano Moulin de Moraes, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Uri Adrian Prync Flato, Thiago Luiz Russo, Gisele Sampaio Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) may require the use of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for prolonged periods. Aggressive MV parameters have been associated with changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with acute intracranial disorders. Significant ICP elevation could compromise intracranial compliance (ICC) and cerebrovascular hemodynamics (CVH). However, the effects of these parameters in individuals without neurological disorders have not yet been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To evaluate ICC in patients on MV with COVID-19 infection compared to other diagnoses, to better characterize the effects of MV and COVID-19 upon ICC. We also compared between the ICC in patients with COVID-19 who did not require MV and healthy volunteers, to assess the isolated effect of COVID-19 upon ICC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was an exploratory, observational study with a convenience sample. The ICC was evaluated with a noninvasive ICP monitoring device. The P2/P1 ratio was calculated by dividing the amplitude of these two points, being defined as \\\"abnormal\\\" when P2 > P1. The statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with random effects to compare the P2/P1 ratio in all four groups on the first monitoring day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A convenience sample of 78 subjects (15 MV-COVID-19, 15 MV non-COVID-19, 24 non-MV-COVID-19, and 24 healthy participants) was prospectively enrolled. There was no difference in P2/P1 ratios between MV patients with and without COVID-19, nor between non-MV patients with COVID-19 and healthy volunteers. However, the P2/P1 ratio was higher in COVID-19 patients with MV use than in those without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This exploratory analysis suggests that COVID-19 does not impair ICC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"82 9\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788669\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19)患者可能需要长期使用有创机械通气(MV)。在急性颅内疾病患者中,积极的机械通气参数与颅内压(ICP)的变化有关。ICP 的显著升高会损害颅内顺应性 (ICC) 和脑血管血流动力学 (CVH)。然而,这些参数对无神经系统疾病患者的影响尚未得到评估:与其他诊断相比,评估感染 COVID-19 的中风患者的 ICC,以更好地描述中风和 COVID-19 对 ICC 的影响。我们还比较了不需要 MV 的 COVID-19 患者与健康志愿者的 ICC,以评估 COVID-19 对 ICC 的单独影响:方法:这是一项探索性观察研究,采用便利样本。使用无创 ICP 监测设备评估 ICC。P2/P1 比值通过除以这两点的振幅计算得出,当 P2 > P1 时定义为 "异常"。统计分析采用随机效应混合线性模型,比较所有四组在监测首日的 P2/P1 比值:前瞻性招募了 78 名受试者(15 名 MV-COVID-19 受试者、15 名 MV 非 COVID-19 受试者、24 名非 MV-COVID-19 受试者和 24 名健康受试者)。有 COVID-19 和没有 COVID-19 的中风病人之间,以及有 COVID-19 的非中风病人和健康志愿者之间的 P2/P1 比率没有差异。然而,使用 COVID-19 的 MV 患者的 P2/P1 比率高于未使用 COVID-19 的患者:这一探索性分析表明,COVID-19 不会损害 ICC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial compliance in patients with COVID-19: a multicenter observational study.

Background:  Patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) may require the use of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for prolonged periods. Aggressive MV parameters have been associated with changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with acute intracranial disorders. Significant ICP elevation could compromise intracranial compliance (ICC) and cerebrovascular hemodynamics (CVH). However, the effects of these parameters in individuals without neurological disorders have not yet been evaluated.

Objective:  To evaluate ICC in patients on MV with COVID-19 infection compared to other diagnoses, to better characterize the effects of MV and COVID-19 upon ICC. We also compared between the ICC in patients with COVID-19 who did not require MV and healthy volunteers, to assess the isolated effect of COVID-19 upon ICC.

Methods:  This was an exploratory, observational study with a convenience sample. The ICC was evaluated with a noninvasive ICP monitoring device. The P2/P1 ratio was calculated by dividing the amplitude of these two points, being defined as "abnormal" when P2 > P1. The statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with random effects to compare the P2/P1 ratio in all four groups on the first monitoring day.

Results:  A convenience sample of 78 subjects (15 MV-COVID-19, 15 MV non-COVID-19, 24 non-MV-COVID-19, and 24 healthy participants) was prospectively enrolled. There was no difference in P2/P1 ratios between MV patients with and without COVID-19, nor between non-MV patients with COVID-19 and healthy volunteers. However, the P2/P1 ratio was higher in COVID-19 patients with MV use than in those without it.

Conclusion:  This exploratory analysis suggests that COVID-19 does not impair ICC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信