酿酒厂副产品经瘤胃体外发酵后固体相关细菌和真菌群落的变化:生物活性化合物和饲料安全问题。

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-ard , Cátia Pacífico , Mubarik Mahmood , Elsayed Mickdam , Julia Meixner , Laura-Sophie Traintinger , Qendrim Zebeli
{"title":"酿酒厂副产品经瘤胃体外发酵后固体相关细菌和真菌群落的变化:生物活性化合物和饲料安全问题。","authors":"Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-ard ,&nbsp;Cátia Pacífico ,&nbsp;Mubarik Mahmood ,&nbsp;Elsayed Mickdam ,&nbsp;Julia Meixner ,&nbsp;Laura-Sophie Traintinger ,&nbsp;Qendrim Zebeli","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Feeding winery by-products (WBP) could affect the bovine microbiome because of their phenol compounds and a transfer of WBP-associated microbiota. This work examined changes in the underexplored solid-associated rumen microbiome following the inclusion of WBP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the rumen simulation technique, fermenters were inoculated with the inoculum of donor cows and were fed one of six dietary treatments including a control diet of 70 % hay +30 % concentrate (CON), control diet + 3.7 % commercial grapeseed extract (EXT), 65 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 10 % grape pomace (GP-low), 56 % hay + 24 % concentrate + 20 % grape pomace (GP-high), 70 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 5 % grapeseed meal (GS-low), and 65 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 10 % grapeseed meal (GS-high) (dry matter basis). The compositional changes of bacteria, archaea and fungi in the solid fractions were based on 16S and ITS2 rRNA sequencing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The alpha- and beta-diversity of the microbiota were unaffected. However, treatment modified the bacterial composition at low taxonomic levels. <em>Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens</em>, <em>Treponema bryantii</em>, and bacterium MC2010 decreased in EXT, while <em>Treponema berlinense</em> was increased in GP-high and GP-low compared to CON. Concerning fungi, GS-high increased <em>Candida</em> spp.<em>, Lachancea</em> spp.<em>, Microdochium</em> spp.<em>, Mucor</em> spp.<em>, Pichia</em> spp.<em>, Saturnispora</em> spp.<em>,</em> and <em>Zygosaccharomyces</em> spp. compared to CON. Many non-<em>Saccharomyces</em> yeasts were detected in WBP samples but absent in donor cows and CON samples. The genera affected by treatment were not the major contributors to the ruminal degradation of nutrients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results indicate a sensitivity of rumen solid bacteria to grape phenols when delivered as an extract and a transfer of WBP-associated microbiota into the rumen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8050,"journal":{"name":"Anaerobe","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996424000763/pdfft?md5=f26adcc727df8f717fb35c58701764e2&pid=1-s2.0-S1075996424000763-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the solid-associated bacterial and fungal communities following ruminal in vitro fermentation of winery by-products: aspects of the bioactive compounds and feed safety\",\"authors\":\"Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-ard ,&nbsp;Cátia Pacífico ,&nbsp;Mubarik Mahmood ,&nbsp;Elsayed Mickdam ,&nbsp;Julia Meixner ,&nbsp;Laura-Sophie Traintinger ,&nbsp;Qendrim Zebeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Feeding winery by-products (WBP) could affect the bovine microbiome because of their phenol compounds and a transfer of WBP-associated microbiota. This work examined changes in the underexplored solid-associated rumen microbiome following the inclusion of WBP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the rumen simulation technique, fermenters were inoculated with the inoculum of donor cows and were fed one of six dietary treatments including a control diet of 70 % hay +30 % concentrate (CON), control diet + 3.7 % commercial grapeseed extract (EXT), 65 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 10 % grape pomace (GP-low), 56 % hay + 24 % concentrate + 20 % grape pomace (GP-high), 70 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 5 % grapeseed meal (GS-low), and 65 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 10 % grapeseed meal (GS-high) (dry matter basis). The compositional changes of bacteria, archaea and fungi in the solid fractions were based on 16S and ITS2 rRNA sequencing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The alpha- and beta-diversity of the microbiota were unaffected. However, treatment modified the bacterial composition at low taxonomic levels. <em>Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens</em>, <em>Treponema bryantii</em>, and bacterium MC2010 decreased in EXT, while <em>Treponema berlinense</em> was increased in GP-high and GP-low compared to CON. Concerning fungi, GS-high increased <em>Candida</em> spp.<em>, Lachancea</em> spp.<em>, Microdochium</em> spp.<em>, Mucor</em> spp.<em>, Pichia</em> spp.<em>, Saturnispora</em> spp.<em>,</em> and <em>Zygosaccharomyces</em> spp. compared to CON. Many non-<em>Saccharomyces</em> yeasts were detected in WBP samples but absent in donor cows and CON samples. The genera affected by treatment were not the major contributors to the ruminal degradation of nutrients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results indicate a sensitivity of rumen solid bacteria to grape phenols when delivered as an extract and a transfer of WBP-associated microbiota into the rumen.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaerobe\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996424000763/pdfft?md5=f26adcc727df8f717fb35c58701764e2&pid=1-s2.0-S1075996424000763-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaerobe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996424000763\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaerobe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996424000763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:饲喂酿酒厂副产品(WBP)可能会影响牛的微生物组,因为它们含有酚类化合物,而且会转移 WBP 相关微生物群。本研究考察了在添加 WBP 后,未被充分探索的固体相关瘤胃微生物群的变化:方法:使用瘤胃模拟技术,在发酵罐中接种供体奶牛的接种物,并饲喂六种日粮处理之一,包括 70% 干草 + 30% 精料的对照日粮(CON)、对照日粮 + 3.7%的商品葡萄籽提取物(EXT)、65%干草+25%精料+10%葡萄渣(GP-低)、56%干草+24%精料+20%葡萄渣(GP-高)、70%干草+25%精料+5%葡萄籽粕(GS-低)和65%干草+25%精料+10%葡萄籽粕(GS-高)(干物质基础)。根据 16S 和 ITS2 rRNA 测序分析了固体馏分中细菌、古菌和真菌的组成变化:结果:微生物群的α-和β-多样性未受影响。然而,处理改变了低分类水平的细菌组成。与CON相比,EXT中的布氏纤毛虫、白喉特雷波菌和MC2010细菌减少了,而GP-高和GP-低中的柏林特雷波菌增加了。在真菌方面,与对照组相比,GS-高增加了念珠菌属、Lachancea 菌属、Microdochium 菌属、Mucor 菌属、Pichia 菌属、Saturnispora 菌属和 Zygosaccharomyces 菌属。在 WBP 样品中检测到了许多非酵母菌,但在供体牛和 CON 样品中却没有检测到。受处理影响的菌属并非瘤胃营养物质降解的主要贡献者:结论:研究结果表明,瘤胃固态菌对以提取物形式输送的葡萄酚很敏感,WBP相关微生物群会转移到瘤胃中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in the solid-associated bacterial and fungal communities following ruminal in vitro fermentation of winery by-products: aspects of the bioactive compounds and feed safety

Objectives

Feeding winery by-products (WBP) could affect the bovine microbiome because of their phenol compounds and a transfer of WBP-associated microbiota. This work examined changes in the underexplored solid-associated rumen microbiome following the inclusion of WBP.

Methods

Using the rumen simulation technique, fermenters were inoculated with the inoculum of donor cows and were fed one of six dietary treatments including a control diet of 70 % hay +30 % concentrate (CON), control diet + 3.7 % commercial grapeseed extract (EXT), 65 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 10 % grape pomace (GP-low), 56 % hay + 24 % concentrate + 20 % grape pomace (GP-high), 70 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 5 % grapeseed meal (GS-low), and 65 % hay + 25 % concentrate + 10 % grapeseed meal (GS-high) (dry matter basis). The compositional changes of bacteria, archaea and fungi in the solid fractions were based on 16S and ITS2 rRNA sequencing.

Results

The alpha- and beta-diversity of the microbiota were unaffected. However, treatment modified the bacterial composition at low taxonomic levels. Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Treponema bryantii, and bacterium MC2010 decreased in EXT, while Treponema berlinense was increased in GP-high and GP-low compared to CON. Concerning fungi, GS-high increased Candida spp., Lachancea spp., Microdochium spp., Mucor spp., Pichia spp., Saturnispora spp., and Zygosaccharomyces spp. compared to CON. Many non-Saccharomyces yeasts were detected in WBP samples but absent in donor cows and CON samples. The genera affected by treatment were not the major contributors to the ruminal degradation of nutrients.

Conclusions

The results indicate a sensitivity of rumen solid bacteria to grape phenols when delivered as an extract and a transfer of WBP-associated microbiota into the rumen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaerobe
Anaerobe 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Anaerobe is essential reading for those who wish to remain at the forefront of discoveries relating to life processes of strictly anaerobes. The journal is multi-disciplinary, and provides a unique forum for those investigating anaerobic organisms that cause infections in humans and animals, as well as anaerobes that play roles in microbiomes or environmental processes. Anaerobe publishes reviews, mini reviews, original research articles, notes and case reports. Relevant topics fall into the broad categories of anaerobes in human and animal diseases, anaerobes in the microbiome, anaerobes in the environment, diagnosis of anaerobes in clinical microbiology laboratories, molecular biology, genetics, pathogenesis, toxins and antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信