[经股动脉 TAVI 手术中的局部麻醉与局部区域麻醉]。

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Clément Jehl , Stéphane Sanchez , Laurent Chapoutot , Sophie Tassan Mangina , Virginie Heroguelle , Aurelien Villecourt , Damien Metz , Laurent Faroux
{"title":"[经股动脉 TAVI 手术中的局部麻醉与局部区域麻醉]。","authors":"Clément Jehl ,&nbsp;Stéphane Sanchez ,&nbsp;Laurent Chapoutot ,&nbsp;Sophie Tassan Mangina ,&nbsp;Virginie Heroguelle ,&nbsp;Aurelien Villecourt ,&nbsp;Damien Metz ,&nbsp;Laurent Faroux","doi":"10.1016/j.ancard.2024.101786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for the most fragile patients with severe aortic stenosis. The transfemoral route is preferred as the simplest and safest. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety of local vs. locoregional anesthesia in trans-femoral TAVI procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients treated with femoral TAVI between February 25 and November 15, 2022 at the University Hospital of Reims were included, and two groups (local and locoregional anesthesia) were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TAVI success rate (92.9%), death rate (3.0%) and procedure duration (90.5 ± 13.5 minutes) did not differ between groups (<em>p</em> = 0.18, 0.15 and 0.55 respectively). For intra- and post-procedural treatments, the use of sedation, analgesics and benzodiazepines did not differ between groups. The cumulative dose of Remifentanil used per-procedure was lower in the local anesthesia group than in the locoregional anesthesia group (148.6 ± 71.9 mcg vs. 208.9 ± 110.0 mcg; <em>p</em> = 0.025).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this non-randomized retrospective study, local and locoregional anesthesia had comparable safety and efficacy in transfemoral TAVI procedures. In a constrained context and with a view to simplification, these results encourage transfemoral TAVIs to be performed under local anaesthesia, and to consider a “PCI-like” approach, without the presence of an anaesthetist, for selected patients without respiratory, musculoskeletal or agitation disorders, or vascular approach difficulties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7899,"journal":{"name":"Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie","volume":"73 5","pages":"Article 101786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthésie locale comparée à l'anesthésie locorégionale dans les procédures TAVI par voie transfémorale\",\"authors\":\"Clément Jehl ,&nbsp;Stéphane Sanchez ,&nbsp;Laurent Chapoutot ,&nbsp;Sophie Tassan Mangina ,&nbsp;Virginie Heroguelle ,&nbsp;Aurelien Villecourt ,&nbsp;Damien Metz ,&nbsp;Laurent Faroux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancard.2024.101786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for the most fragile patients with severe aortic stenosis. The transfemoral route is preferred as the simplest and safest. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety of local vs. locoregional anesthesia in trans-femoral TAVI procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients treated with femoral TAVI between February 25 and November 15, 2022 at the University Hospital of Reims were included, and two groups (local and locoregional anesthesia) were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TAVI success rate (92.9%), death rate (3.0%) and procedure duration (90.5 ± 13.5 minutes) did not differ between groups (<em>p</em> = 0.18, 0.15 and 0.55 respectively). For intra- and post-procedural treatments, the use of sedation, analgesics and benzodiazepines did not differ between groups. The cumulative dose of Remifentanil used per-procedure was lower in the local anesthesia group than in the locoregional anesthesia group (148.6 ± 71.9 mcg vs. 208.9 ± 110.0 mcg; <em>p</em> = 0.025).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this non-randomized retrospective study, local and locoregional anesthesia had comparable safety and efficacy in transfemoral TAVI procedures. In a constrained context and with a view to simplification, these results encourage transfemoral TAVIs to be performed under local anaesthesia, and to consider a “PCI-like” approach, without the presence of an anaesthetist, for selected patients without respiratory, musculoskeletal or agitation disorders, or vascular approach difficulties.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003392824000659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003392824000659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为最脆弱的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的首选治疗方法。经胸途径是最简单、最安全的首选。我们的研究旨在比较经股动脉 TAVI 手术中局部麻醉与局部区域麻醉的有效性、耐受性和安全性:这是一项单中心回顾性研究。纳入了2022年2月25日至11月15日期间在兰斯大学医院接受股骨TAVI治疗的患者,并对两组(局部麻醉和局部麻醉)进行了比较:结果:两组间的TAVI成功率(92.9%)、死亡率(3.0%)和手术时间(90.5 ± 13.5分钟)无差异(P分别为0.18、0.15和0.55)。在术中和术后治疗方面,镇静剂、镇痛剂和苯二氮卓类药物的使用在组间无差异。局麻组每次手术使用的雷米芬太尼累积剂量低于局部麻醉组(148.6 ± 71.9 mcg vs. 208.9 ± 110.0 mcg; p = 0.025):在这项非随机回顾性研究中,局部麻醉和局部麻醉在经股动脉TAVI手术中的安全性和有效性相当。在有限的条件下,为了简化手术,这些结果鼓励在局部麻醉下进行经股动脉TAVI手术,并考虑采用 "PCI-like "方法,无需麻醉师在场,适用于没有呼吸系统、肌肉骨骼或躁动障碍或血管入路困难的特定患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anesthésie locale comparée à l'anesthésie locorégionale dans les procédures TAVI par voie transfémorale

Introduction

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for the most fragile patients with severe aortic stenosis. The transfemoral route is preferred as the simplest and safest. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety of local vs. locoregional anesthesia in trans-femoral TAVI procedures.

Material and method

This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients treated with femoral TAVI between February 25 and November 15, 2022 at the University Hospital of Reims were included, and two groups (local and locoregional anesthesia) were compared.

Results

TAVI success rate (92.9%), death rate (3.0%) and procedure duration (90.5 ± 13.5 minutes) did not differ between groups (p = 0.18, 0.15 and 0.55 respectively). For intra- and post-procedural treatments, the use of sedation, analgesics and benzodiazepines did not differ between groups. The cumulative dose of Remifentanil used per-procedure was lower in the local anesthesia group than in the locoregional anesthesia group (148.6 ± 71.9 mcg vs. 208.9 ± 110.0 mcg; p = 0.025).

Conclusions

In this non-randomized retrospective study, local and locoregional anesthesia had comparable safety and efficacy in transfemoral TAVI procedures. In a constrained context and with a view to simplification, these results encourage transfemoral TAVIs to be performed under local anaesthesia, and to consider a “PCI-like” approach, without the presence of an anaesthetist, for selected patients without respiratory, musculoskeletal or agitation disorders, or vascular approach difficulties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Organe scientifique de référence fondé en 1951, les Annales de cardiologie et d''angéiologie abordent tous les domaines qui intéressent quotidiennement les cardiologues et les angéiologues praticiens : neurologie et radiologie vasculaires, hémostase, diabétologie, médecine interne, épidémiologie et prévention. Les Annales de cardiologie et d''angéiologie sont indexées aux grandes bases de données et publient rapidement, et en conformité avec les normes internationales de publication scientifique, des articles en français sur la pathologie cardiaque.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信