长江三角洲温室番茄生产系统的环境影响与缓解潜力

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Gang Wu, Mingjiong Zhao, Bin Liu, Xingbang Wang, Manman Yuan, Jiabao Wang, Xinping Chen, Xiaozhong Wang, Yixiang Sun
{"title":"长江三角洲温室番茄生产系统的环境影响与缓解潜力","authors":"Gang Wu, Mingjiong Zhao, Bin Liu, Xingbang Wang, Manman Yuan, Jiabao Wang, Xinping Chen, Xiaozhong Wang, Yixiang Sun","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-06851-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>Greenhouse tomatoes production with high productivity but also with high fertilizer inputs has rapidly developed in the Yangtze River Delta. It is a great significance to explore methods for reducing environmental cost for the sustainable development of facility agriculture in the region.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Based on farmer survey data grouped according to yield and efficiency, this study analyzed the resource input, environmental cost, and mitigation potential of plastic-greenhouse tomato production and identified reasonable mitigation measures for tomato production in the Yangtze River Delta.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The average loss of reactive nitrogen (Nr) in the farmers’ tomato production systems was 96.7 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>; the N footprint was 1.14 kg N t<sup>−1</sup>; and the Nr emission per unit net profits (Nr<sub>NP</sub>) was 7.75 kg N $1000<sup>–1</sup>. There was a large difference in the active nitrogen (Nr) loss and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for tomato production among farmers. Compared with the high-yield and high-efficiency (HH) group, Nr loss of the low-yield and low-efficiency (LL) and high-yield and low-efficiency (HL) groups were 60.6% and 80.9% higher, and the GHG emissions of the LL and HL groups were 29.2% and 41.6% higher, respectively. Meanwhile, Nr loss and GHG emissions of the low-yield and high-efficiency (LH) group were 17.5% and 13.4% lower than those of the HH group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Based on these findings, reducing the amount of nitrogen applied, using organic alternative methods, returning straw to the field, and reducing irrigation water are the recommended mitigations to reduce the environmental costs of greenhouse vegetable production.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental impact and mitigation potentials in Greenhouse tomatoes production system in Yangtze River Delta\",\"authors\":\"Gang Wu, Mingjiong Zhao, Bin Liu, Xingbang Wang, Manman Yuan, Jiabao Wang, Xinping Chen, Xiaozhong Wang, Yixiang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-06851-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims</h3><p>Greenhouse tomatoes production with high productivity but also with high fertilizer inputs has rapidly developed in the Yangtze River Delta. It is a great significance to explore methods for reducing environmental cost for the sustainable development of facility agriculture in the region.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Based on farmer survey data grouped according to yield and efficiency, this study analyzed the resource input, environmental cost, and mitigation potential of plastic-greenhouse tomato production and identified reasonable mitigation measures for tomato production in the Yangtze River Delta.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The average loss of reactive nitrogen (Nr) in the farmers’ tomato production systems was 96.7 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>; the N footprint was 1.14 kg N t<sup>−1</sup>; and the Nr emission per unit net profits (Nr<sub>NP</sub>) was 7.75 kg N $1000<sup>–1</sup>. There was a large difference in the active nitrogen (Nr) loss and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for tomato production among farmers. Compared with the high-yield and high-efficiency (HH) group, Nr loss of the low-yield and low-efficiency (LL) and high-yield and low-efficiency (HL) groups were 60.6% and 80.9% higher, and the GHG emissions of the LL and HL groups were 29.2% and 41.6% higher, respectively. Meanwhile, Nr loss and GHG emissions of the low-yield and high-efficiency (LH) group were 17.5% and 13.4% lower than those of the HH group.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Based on these findings, reducing the amount of nitrogen applied, using organic alternative methods, returning straw to the field, and reducing irrigation water are the recommended mitigations to reduce the environmental costs of greenhouse vegetable production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06851-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06851-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的长三角地区温室番茄生产发展迅速,产量高,但肥料投入也大,探索降低环境成本的方法对该地区设施农业的可持续发展具有重要意义。方法基于农户调查数据,按照产量和效益分组,分析塑料大棚番茄生产的资源投入、环境成本和减排潜力,确定合理的减排措施,为长三角番茄生产提供参考。结果 农民番茄生产系统的平均活性氮(Nr)损失为 96.7 kg N ha-1;氮足迹为 1.14 kg N t-1;单位净利润的氮排放量(NrNP)为 7.75 kg N $1000-1。不同农户在番茄生产中的有效氮(Nr)损失和温室气体(GHG)排放存在较大差异。与高产高效(HH)组相比,低产低效(LL)组和高产低效(HL)组的氮损失分别高出 60.6% 和 80.9%,LL 组和 HL 组的温室气体排放量分别高出 29.2% 和 41.6%。结论根据这些研究结果,建议减少氮肥施用量、使用有机替代方法、秸秆还田和减少灌溉用水,以降低温室蔬菜生产的环境成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Environmental impact and mitigation potentials in Greenhouse tomatoes production system in Yangtze River Delta

Environmental impact and mitigation potentials in Greenhouse tomatoes production system in Yangtze River Delta

Aims

Greenhouse tomatoes production with high productivity but also with high fertilizer inputs has rapidly developed in the Yangtze River Delta. It is a great significance to explore methods for reducing environmental cost for the sustainable development of facility agriculture in the region.

Methods

Based on farmer survey data grouped according to yield and efficiency, this study analyzed the resource input, environmental cost, and mitigation potential of plastic-greenhouse tomato production and identified reasonable mitigation measures for tomato production in the Yangtze River Delta.

Results

The average loss of reactive nitrogen (Nr) in the farmers’ tomato production systems was 96.7 kg N ha−1; the N footprint was 1.14 kg N t−1; and the Nr emission per unit net profits (NrNP) was 7.75 kg N $1000–1. There was a large difference in the active nitrogen (Nr) loss and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for tomato production among farmers. Compared with the high-yield and high-efficiency (HH) group, Nr loss of the low-yield and low-efficiency (LL) and high-yield and low-efficiency (HL) groups were 60.6% and 80.9% higher, and the GHG emissions of the LL and HL groups were 29.2% and 41.6% higher, respectively. Meanwhile, Nr loss and GHG emissions of the low-yield and high-efficiency (LH) group were 17.5% and 13.4% lower than those of the HH group.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, reducing the amount of nitrogen applied, using organic alternative methods, returning straw to the field, and reducing irrigation water are the recommended mitigations to reduce the environmental costs of greenhouse vegetable production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信