帕金森病数据驱动型深部脑刺激编程策略的贝塔峰值检测算法比较

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Sunderland K. Baker, Erin M. Radcliffe, Daniel R. Kramer, Steven Ojemann, Michelle Case, Caleb Zarns, Abbey Holt-Becker, Robert S. Raike, Alexander J. Baumgartner, Drew S. Kern, John A. Thompson
{"title":"帕金森病数据驱动型深部脑刺激编程策略的贝塔峰值检测算法比较","authors":"Sunderland K. Baker, Erin M. Radcliffe, Daniel R. Kramer, Steven Ojemann, Michelle Case, Caleb Zarns, Abbey Holt-Becker, Robert S. Raike, Alexander J. Baumgartner, Drew S. Kern, John A. Thompson","doi":"10.1038/s41531-024-00762-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Oscillatory activity within the beta frequency range (13–30 Hz) serves as a Parkinson’s disease biomarker for tailoring deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatments. Currently, identifying clinically relevant beta signals, specifically frequencies of peak amplitudes within the beta spectral band, is a subjective process. To inform potential strategies for objective clinical decision making, we assessed algorithms for identifying beta peaks and devised a standardized approach for both research and clinical applications. Employing a novel monopolar referencing strategy, we utilized a brain sensing device to measure beta peak power across distinct contacts along each DBS electrode implanted in the subthalamic nucleus. We then evaluated the accuracy of ten beta peak detection algorithms against a benchmark established by expert consensus. The most accurate algorithms, all sharing similar underlying algebraic dynamic peak amplitude thresholding approaches, matched the expert consensus in performance and reliably predicted the clinical stimulation parameters during follow-up visits. These findings highlight the potential of algorithmic solutions to overcome the subjective bias in beta peak identification, presenting viable options for standardizing this process. Such advancements could lead to significant improvements in the efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific DBS therapy parameterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of beta peak detection algorithms for data-driven deep brain stimulation programming strategies in Parkinson’s disease\",\"authors\":\"Sunderland K. Baker, Erin M. Radcliffe, Daniel R. Kramer, Steven Ojemann, Michelle Case, Caleb Zarns, Abbey Holt-Becker, Robert S. Raike, Alexander J. Baumgartner, Drew S. Kern, John A. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-024-00762-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Oscillatory activity within the beta frequency range (13–30 Hz) serves as a Parkinson’s disease biomarker for tailoring deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatments. Currently, identifying clinically relevant beta signals, specifically frequencies of peak amplitudes within the beta spectral band, is a subjective process. To inform potential strategies for objective clinical decision making, we assessed algorithms for identifying beta peaks and devised a standardized approach for both research and clinical applications. Employing a novel monopolar referencing strategy, we utilized a brain sensing device to measure beta peak power across distinct contacts along each DBS electrode implanted in the subthalamic nucleus. We then evaluated the accuracy of ten beta peak detection algorithms against a benchmark established by expert consensus. The most accurate algorithms, all sharing similar underlying algebraic dynamic peak amplitude thresholding approaches, matched the expert consensus in performance and reliably predicted the clinical stimulation parameters during follow-up visits. These findings highlight the potential of algorithmic solutions to overcome the subjective bias in beta peak identification, presenting viable options for standardizing this process. Such advancements could lead to significant improvements in the efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific DBS therapy parameterization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00762-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00762-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝塔频率范围(13-30 赫兹)内的振荡活动是帕金森病的生物标志物,可用于定制脑深部刺激(DBS)疗法。目前,识别临床相关的贝塔信号,特别是贝塔频谱带内的峰值振幅频率,是一个主观的过程。为了给客观临床决策的潜在策略提供信息,我们评估了识别贝塔峰值的算法,并为研究和临床应用设计了一种标准化方法。我们采用了一种新颖的单极参考策略,利用脑传感设备测量了植入丘脑下核的每个 DBS 电极上不同触点上的β峰值功率。然后,我们根据专家共识确定的基准,评估了十种贝塔峰值检测算法的准确性。最准确的算法均采用类似的代数动态峰值振幅阈值方法,其性能与专家共识相匹配,并能可靠地预测随访期间的临床刺激参数。这些发现凸显了算法解决方案在克服贝塔峰识别主观偏差方面的潜力,为这一过程的标准化提供了可行的方案。这种进步可能会显著提高患者特异性 DBS 治疗参数化的效率和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of beta peak detection algorithms for data-driven deep brain stimulation programming strategies in Parkinson’s disease

Comparison of beta peak detection algorithms for data-driven deep brain stimulation programming strategies in Parkinson’s disease

Oscillatory activity within the beta frequency range (13–30 Hz) serves as a Parkinson’s disease biomarker for tailoring deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatments. Currently, identifying clinically relevant beta signals, specifically frequencies of peak amplitudes within the beta spectral band, is a subjective process. To inform potential strategies for objective clinical decision making, we assessed algorithms for identifying beta peaks and devised a standardized approach for both research and clinical applications. Employing a novel monopolar referencing strategy, we utilized a brain sensing device to measure beta peak power across distinct contacts along each DBS electrode implanted in the subthalamic nucleus. We then evaluated the accuracy of ten beta peak detection algorithms against a benchmark established by expert consensus. The most accurate algorithms, all sharing similar underlying algebraic dynamic peak amplitude thresholding approaches, matched the expert consensus in performance and reliably predicted the clinical stimulation parameters during follow-up visits. These findings highlight the potential of algorithmic solutions to overcome the subjective bias in beta peak identification, presenting viable options for standardizing this process. Such advancements could lead to significant improvements in the efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific DBS therapy parameterization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信