Mar Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Afrodita Marcu, Emma Ream, Katriina L Whitaker
{"title":"了解并解决癌症不公平问题:交叉性为研究人员、决策者和服务提供者提供了哪些机会?范围综述。","authors":"Mar Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Afrodita Marcu, Emma Ream, Katriina L Whitaker","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2024.2361642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem identification: </strong>We summarised the international evidence relating to the role of intersectionality in patients' lived experience of inequities along the cancer care pathway. We produced guidance to use intersectionality in future research.</p><p><strong>Literature search: </strong>We included 42 articles published between 1989 to 2023 that used intersectionality to guide the study and interpretation of inequities in cancer care.</p><p><strong>Data evaluation/synthesis: </strong>Articles predominantly comprised North American (<i>n</i> = 37), followed by European (<i>n</i> = 4) and Asian (<i>n</i> = 1) studies. Similar compounding effects of racism, homophobia, and discrimination across countries exacerbated inequities in cancer care experience and cancer outcomes particularly for women of color and sexual/gender minority groups. Professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward minoritised groups affected patient-provider relationships and influenced cancer patients' psychosocial responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intersectionality provides a framework to assess the personal, interpersonal, and structural processes through which cancer inequities manifest within and across countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding and tackling cancer inequities: What opportunities does intersectionality offer researchers, policymakers, and providers? A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Mar Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Afrodita Marcu, Emma Ream, Katriina L Whitaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07347332.2024.2361642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem identification: </strong>We summarised the international evidence relating to the role of intersectionality in patients' lived experience of inequities along the cancer care pathway. We produced guidance to use intersectionality in future research.</p><p><strong>Literature search: </strong>We included 42 articles published between 1989 to 2023 that used intersectionality to guide the study and interpretation of inequities in cancer care.</p><p><strong>Data evaluation/synthesis: </strong>Articles predominantly comprised North American (<i>n</i> = 37), followed by European (<i>n</i> = 4) and Asian (<i>n</i> = 1) studies. Similar compounding effects of racism, homophobia, and discrimination across countries exacerbated inequities in cancer care experience and cancer outcomes particularly for women of color and sexual/gender minority groups. Professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward minoritised groups affected patient-provider relationships and influenced cancer patients' psychosocial responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intersectionality provides a framework to assess the personal, interpersonal, and structural processes through which cancer inequities manifest within and across countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2361642\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2361642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding and tackling cancer inequities: What opportunities does intersectionality offer researchers, policymakers, and providers? A scoping review.
Problem identification: We summarised the international evidence relating to the role of intersectionality in patients' lived experience of inequities along the cancer care pathway. We produced guidance to use intersectionality in future research.
Literature search: We included 42 articles published between 1989 to 2023 that used intersectionality to guide the study and interpretation of inequities in cancer care.
Data evaluation/synthesis: Articles predominantly comprised North American (n = 37), followed by European (n = 4) and Asian (n = 1) studies. Similar compounding effects of racism, homophobia, and discrimination across countries exacerbated inequities in cancer care experience and cancer outcomes particularly for women of color and sexual/gender minority groups. Professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward minoritised groups affected patient-provider relationships and influenced cancer patients' psychosocial responses.
Conclusion: Intersectionality provides a framework to assess the personal, interpersonal, and structural processes through which cancer inequities manifest within and across countries.
期刊介绍:
Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.