童年逆境对兴奋剂和阿片类药物急性主观效应的影响:在健康志愿者中进行的安慰剂对照研究的证据。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1177/02698811241268892
Molly Carlyle, Harriet de Wit, Siri Leknes
{"title":"童年逆境对兴奋剂和阿片类药物急性主观效应的影响:在健康志愿者中进行的安慰剂对照研究的证据。","authors":"Molly Carlyle, Harriet de Wit, Siri Leknes","doi":"10.1177/02698811241268892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Early-life adversities are known to alter drug reward processing in rodents. Despite the well-known link between early adversity and the risk of substance use disorder, few studies have measured how childhood adversity affects human drug reward. Here, we assessed the relationship between historical childhood adversities and responses to single doses of methamphetamine, d-amphetamine or buprenorphine in healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a secondary analysis approach, we assessed the impact of childhood adversity on drug effects from three randomised, placebo-controlled studies in which healthy volunteers received methamphetamine (20 mg oral; <i>n</i> = 35), d-amphetamine (20 mg oral; <i>n</i> = 54) or buprenorphine (0.2 mg sublingual; <i>n</i> = 35). Ratings of <i>feeling effect, liking, disliking, feeling high</i> and <i>wanting more</i> of the drug were collected 15-210 min post-administration, and heart rate changes were analysed using random-intercept mixed-effect models. The area under the curve from these and previous studies was calculated to visualise the relationship between childhood adversity severity and drug effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater childhood adversity was associated with reduced <i>feel effects</i> (significant three-way interactions <i>b</i> = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.12, -0.02], <i>p</i> = 0.009), <i>like effects</i> (<i>b</i> = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.00], <i>p</i> = 0.038) and <i>feel high</i> (<i>b</i> = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.10, -0.01], <i>p</i> = 0.020) towards the stimulant drugs 90-180 min post-administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Childhood adversity was not significantly associated with other subjective or heart rate responses to the drugs. Overall, participants with more childhood adversities reported dampened subjective responses to stimulant drugs, but not to buprenorphine. Future studies should examine the generalisability of these relationships, to identify the mechanisms underlying the link between childhood adversity and drug responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"986-997"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of childhood adversity on acute subjective effects of stimulant and opioid drugs: Evidence from placebo-controlled studies in healthy volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Molly Carlyle, Harriet de Wit, Siri Leknes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811241268892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Early-life adversities are known to alter drug reward processing in rodents. Despite the well-known link between early adversity and the risk of substance use disorder, few studies have measured how childhood adversity affects human drug reward. Here, we assessed the relationship between historical childhood adversities and responses to single doses of methamphetamine, d-amphetamine or buprenorphine in healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a secondary analysis approach, we assessed the impact of childhood adversity on drug effects from three randomised, placebo-controlled studies in which healthy volunteers received methamphetamine (20 mg oral; <i>n</i> = 35), d-amphetamine (20 mg oral; <i>n</i> = 54) or buprenorphine (0.2 mg sublingual; <i>n</i> = 35). Ratings of <i>feeling effect, liking, disliking, feeling high</i> and <i>wanting more</i> of the drug were collected 15-210 min post-administration, and heart rate changes were analysed using random-intercept mixed-effect models. The area under the curve from these and previous studies was calculated to visualise the relationship between childhood adversity severity and drug effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater childhood adversity was associated with reduced <i>feel effects</i> (significant three-way interactions <i>b</i> = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.12, -0.02], <i>p</i> = 0.009), <i>like effects</i> (<i>b</i> = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.00], <i>p</i> = 0.038) and <i>feel high</i> (<i>b</i> = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.10, -0.01], <i>p</i> = 0.020) towards the stimulant drugs 90-180 min post-administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Childhood adversity was not significantly associated with other subjective or heart rate responses to the drugs. Overall, participants with more childhood adversities reported dampened subjective responses to stimulant drugs, but not to buprenorphine. Future studies should examine the generalisability of these relationships, to identify the mechanisms underlying the link between childhood adversity and drug responsiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"986-997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241268892\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241268892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:众所周知,早期逆境会改变啮齿类动物的药物奖赏过程。尽管早期逆境与药物使用障碍的风险之间存在众所周知的联系,但很少有研究测量童年逆境如何影响人类的药物奖赏。在此,我们评估了健康参与者童年时期的历史逆境与对单剂量甲基苯丙胺、d-苯丙胺或丁丙诺啡的反应之间的关系:在三项随机、安慰剂对照研究中,健康志愿者接受了甲基苯丙胺(20 毫克口服;n = 35)、d-苯丙胺(20 毫克口服;n = 54)或丁丙诺啡(0.2 毫克舌下含服;n = 35)。在给药后 15-210 分钟收集对药物效果、喜欢、不喜欢、感觉兴奋和想要更多药物的评分,并使用随机截距混合效应模型分析心率变化。通过计算这些研究和以往研究的曲线下面积,可以直观地看出童年逆境严重程度与药物作用之间的关系:结果:童年逆境严重程度与服用兴奋剂 90-180 分钟后的感觉效应(显著的三方交互作用 b = -0.07,95% CI [-0.12,-0.02],p = 0.009)、喜欢效应(b = -0.07,95% CI [-0.13,-0.00],p = 0.038)和兴奋效应(b = -0.06,95% CI [-0.10,-0.01],p = 0.020)降低有关:结论:童年逆境与对药物的其他主观反应或心率反应没有明显关联。总体而言,童年逆境较多的参与者对兴奋剂类药物的主观反应有所减弱,但对丁丙诺啡的主观反应没有减弱。今后的研究应探讨这些关系的普遍性,以确定童年逆境与药物反应之间的关联机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of childhood adversity on acute subjective effects of stimulant and opioid drugs: Evidence from placebo-controlled studies in healthy volunteers.

Background and aims: Early-life adversities are known to alter drug reward processing in rodents. Despite the well-known link between early adversity and the risk of substance use disorder, few studies have measured how childhood adversity affects human drug reward. Here, we assessed the relationship between historical childhood adversities and responses to single doses of methamphetamine, d-amphetamine or buprenorphine in healthy participants.

Methods: Using a secondary analysis approach, we assessed the impact of childhood adversity on drug effects from three randomised, placebo-controlled studies in which healthy volunteers received methamphetamine (20 mg oral; n = 35), d-amphetamine (20 mg oral; n = 54) or buprenorphine (0.2 mg sublingual; n = 35). Ratings of feeling effect, liking, disliking, feeling high and wanting more of the drug were collected 15-210 min post-administration, and heart rate changes were analysed using random-intercept mixed-effect models. The area under the curve from these and previous studies was calculated to visualise the relationship between childhood adversity severity and drug effects.

Results: Greater childhood adversity was associated with reduced feel effects (significant three-way interactions b = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.12, -0.02], p = 0.009), like effects (b = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.00], p = 0.038) and feel high (b = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.10, -0.01], p = 0.020) towards the stimulant drugs 90-180 min post-administration.

Conclusions: Childhood adversity was not significantly associated with other subjective or heart rate responses to the drugs. Overall, participants with more childhood adversities reported dampened subjective responses to stimulant drugs, but not to buprenorphine. Future studies should examine the generalisability of these relationships, to identify the mechanisms underlying the link between childhood adversity and drug responsiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信