气道支架治疗中央气道过度塌陷:随机对照开放标签试验

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chan Yeu Pu, Daniel Ospina-Delgado, Fayez Kheir, Camilo A Avendano, Mihir Parikh, Jason Beattie, Kai E Swenson, Jennifer Wilson, Sidharta P Gangadharan, Adnan Majid
{"title":"气道支架治疗中央气道过度塌陷:随机对照开放标签试验","authors":"Chan Yeu Pu, Daniel Ospina-Delgado, Fayez Kheir, Camilo A Avendano, Mihir Parikh, Jason Beattie, Kai E Swenson, Jennifer Wilson, Sidharta P Gangadharan, Adnan Majid","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-term airway stent placement (stent evaluation) has been employed to evaluate whether patients with excessive central airway collapse (ECAC) will benefit from tracheobronchoplasty. Although retrospective studies have explored the impact of stent placement on ECAC, prospective randomized controlled trials are absent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized open-label trial comparing patients receiving airway stent placement and standard medical treatment (intervention group) versus standard medical treatment alone (control group) for ECAC. At baseline, patients' respiratory symptoms, self-reported measures, and functional capabilities were assessed. Follow-up evaluations occurred 7 to 14 days postintervention, with an option for the control group to crossover to stent placement. Follow-up evaluations were repeated in the crossover patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 17 patients in the control group [medical management (MM)] and 14 patients in the intervention group. At follow-up, 15 patients in the MM crossed over to the stent group, resulting in a total of 29 patients in the combined stent group (CSG). Subjectively (shortness of breath and cough), 45% of the CSG exhibited improvement with the intervention compared with just 12% in the MM. The modified St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score in the CSG improved significantly from 61.2 at baseline to 52.5 after stent placement (-8.7, P = 0.04). With intervention, the 6-minute walk test in CSG improved significantly from 364 meters to 398 meters (34 m, P < 0.01). The MM did not show a significant change in the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score or 6-minute walk test distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term airway stent placement in patients with ECAC significantly improves respiratory symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway Stents for Excessive Central Airway Collapse: A Randomized Controlled Open-label Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Chan Yeu Pu, Daniel Ospina-Delgado, Fayez Kheir, Camilo A Avendano, Mihir Parikh, Jason Beattie, Kai E Swenson, Jennifer Wilson, Sidharta P Gangadharan, Adnan Majid\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-term airway stent placement (stent evaluation) has been employed to evaluate whether patients with excessive central airway collapse (ECAC) will benefit from tracheobronchoplasty. Although retrospective studies have explored the impact of stent placement on ECAC, prospective randomized controlled trials are absent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized open-label trial comparing patients receiving airway stent placement and standard medical treatment (intervention group) versus standard medical treatment alone (control group) for ECAC. At baseline, patients' respiratory symptoms, self-reported measures, and functional capabilities were assessed. Follow-up evaluations occurred 7 to 14 days postintervention, with an option for the control group to crossover to stent placement. Follow-up evaluations were repeated in the crossover patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 17 patients in the control group [medical management (MM)] and 14 patients in the intervention group. At follow-up, 15 patients in the MM crossed over to the stent group, resulting in a total of 29 patients in the combined stent group (CSG). Subjectively (shortness of breath and cough), 45% of the CSG exhibited improvement with the intervention compared with just 12% in the MM. The modified St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score in the CSG improved significantly from 61.2 at baseline to 52.5 after stent placement (-8.7, P = 0.04). With intervention, the 6-minute walk test in CSG improved significantly from 364 meters to 398 meters (34 m, P < 0.01). The MM did not show a significant change in the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score or 6-minute walk test distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term airway stent placement in patients with ECAC significantly improves respiratory symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:短期气道支架置入术(支架评估)被用于评估中心气道过度塌陷(ECAC)患者是否能从气管支气管成形术中获益。虽然有回顾性研究探讨了支架置入对 ECAC 的影响,但缺乏前瞻性随机对照试验:这是一项随机开放标签试验,比较了接受气道支架置入术和标准药物治疗(干预组)与仅接受标准药物治疗(对照组)治疗 ECAC 的患者。基线时,对患者的呼吸道症状、自我报告指标和功能能力进行评估。干预后 7 到 14 天进行随访评估,对照组可选择交叉支架置入。交叉组患者重复进行随访评估:研究共招募了 17 名对照组患者(医疗管理 (MM))和 14 名干预组患者。随访时,15 名 MM 组患者转入支架组,因此联合支架组(CSG)共有 29 名患者。主观上(气短和咳嗽),45% 的 CSG 患者在接受干预后病情有所改善,而 MM 组仅有 12%。CSG患者的改良圣乔治呼吸问卷评分从基线时的61.2分显著改善到支架植入后的52.5分(-8.7,P = 0.04)。通过干预,CSG 的 6 分钟步行测试从 364 米显著提高到 398 米(34 米,P < 0.01)。MM的圣乔治呼吸问卷评分和6分钟步行测试距离均无明显变化:结论:ECAC 患者短期气道支架置入可明显改善呼吸道症状、生活质量和运动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway Stents for Excessive Central Airway Collapse: A Randomized Controlled Open-label Trial.

Background: Short-term airway stent placement (stent evaluation) has been employed to evaluate whether patients with excessive central airway collapse (ECAC) will benefit from tracheobronchoplasty. Although retrospective studies have explored the impact of stent placement on ECAC, prospective randomized controlled trials are absent.

Methods: This was a randomized open-label trial comparing patients receiving airway stent placement and standard medical treatment (intervention group) versus standard medical treatment alone (control group) for ECAC. At baseline, patients' respiratory symptoms, self-reported measures, and functional capabilities were assessed. Follow-up evaluations occurred 7 to 14 days postintervention, with an option for the control group to crossover to stent placement. Follow-up evaluations were repeated in the crossover patients.

Results: The study enrolled 17 patients in the control group [medical management (MM)] and 14 patients in the intervention group. At follow-up, 15 patients in the MM crossed over to the stent group, resulting in a total of 29 patients in the combined stent group (CSG). Subjectively (shortness of breath and cough), 45% of the CSG exhibited improvement with the intervention compared with just 12% in the MM. The modified St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score in the CSG improved significantly from 61.2 at baseline to 52.5 after stent placement (-8.7, P = 0.04). With intervention, the 6-minute walk test in CSG improved significantly from 364 meters to 398 meters (34 m, P < 0.01). The MM did not show a significant change in the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score or 6-minute walk test distance.

Conclusion: Short-term airway stent placement in patients with ECAC significantly improves respiratory symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信