肺的沉默:比较肺功能测试和计算机断层扫描对慢速和非交流肺单位的测量。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024
Christopher Short, Thomas Semple, Mary Abkir, Simon Padley, Mark Rosenthal, Paul McNally, Harm Tiddens, Daan Caudri, Andrew Bush, Jane C Davies
{"title":"肺的沉默:比较肺功能测试和计算机断层扫描对慢速和非交流肺单位的测量。","authors":"Christopher Short, Thomas Semple, Mary Abkir, Simon Padley, Mark Rosenthal, Paul McNally, Harm Tiddens, Daan Caudri, Andrew Bush, Jane C Davies","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple breath washout (MBW) has successfully assessed the silent lung zone particularly in cystic fibrosis lung disease, however, it is limited to the communicating lung only. There are a number of different pulmonary function methods that can assess what is commonly referred to as trapped air, with varying approaches and sensitivity. Twenty-five people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) underwent MBW, spirometry, body plethysmography, and spirometry-controlled computed tomography (spiro-CT) on the same day. PwCF also performed extensions to MBW that evaluate air trapping, including our novel extension (MBW<sub>ShX</sub>), which reveals the extent of underventilated lung units (UVLU). In addition, we used two previously established 5-breath methods that provide a volume of trapped gas (VTG). We used trapped air % from spiro-CT as the gold standard for comparison. UVLU derived from MBW<sub>ShX</sub> showed the best agreement with trapped air %, both in terms of correlation (<i>R</i><sub>S</sub> 0.89, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and sensitivity (79%). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a significant underestimation of the VTG by both 5-breath methods (-249 mL [95% CI -10,796; 580 mL] and -203 mL [95% CI -997; 591 mL], respectively). Parameters from both spirometry and body plethysmography were suboptimal at assessing this pathophysiology. The parameters from MBW<sub>ShX</sub> demonstrated the best relationship with spiro-CT and had the best sensitivity compared with the other pulmonary function methods assessed in this study. MBW<sub>ShX</sub> shows promise to assess and monitor this critical pathophysiological feature, which has been shown to be a driver of lung disease progression in pwCF.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We consider the term \"trapped air\" either in the use of imaging or pulmonary function testing, something of a misnomer that can lead to an inaccurate assessment of an important physiological feature. Instead, we propose the term underventilated lung units (UVLU). Of the many pulmonary function methods we used in this study, we found that the use of multiple breath washout with short extension (MBW<sub>ShX</sub>) to be the best nonimaging method.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silence of the lungs: comparing measures of slow and noncommunicating lung units from pulmonary function tests with computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Short, Thomas Semple, Mary Abkir, Simon Padley, Mark Rosenthal, Paul McNally, Harm Tiddens, Daan Caudri, Andrew Bush, Jane C Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multiple breath washout (MBW) has successfully assessed the silent lung zone particularly in cystic fibrosis lung disease, however, it is limited to the communicating lung only. There are a number of different pulmonary function methods that can assess what is commonly referred to as trapped air, with varying approaches and sensitivity. Twenty-five people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) underwent MBW, spirometry, body plethysmography, and spirometry-controlled computed tomography (spiro-CT) on the same day. PwCF also performed extensions to MBW that evaluate air trapping, including our novel extension (MBW<sub>ShX</sub>), which reveals the extent of underventilated lung units (UVLU). In addition, we used two previously established 5-breath methods that provide a volume of trapped gas (VTG). We used trapped air % from spiro-CT as the gold standard for comparison. UVLU derived from MBW<sub>ShX</sub> showed the best agreement with trapped air %, both in terms of correlation (<i>R</i><sub>S</sub> 0.89, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and sensitivity (79%). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a significant underestimation of the VTG by both 5-breath methods (-249 mL [95% CI -10,796; 580 mL] and -203 mL [95% CI -997; 591 mL], respectively). Parameters from both spirometry and body plethysmography were suboptimal at assessing this pathophysiology. The parameters from MBW<sub>ShX</sub> demonstrated the best relationship with spiro-CT and had the best sensitivity compared with the other pulmonary function methods assessed in this study. MBW<sub>ShX</sub> shows promise to assess and monitor this critical pathophysiological feature, which has been shown to be a driver of lung disease progression in pwCF.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We consider the term \\\"trapped air\\\" either in the use of imaging or pulmonary function testing, something of a misnomer that can lead to an inaccurate assessment of an important physiological feature. Instead, we propose the term underventilated lung units (UVLU). Of the many pulmonary function methods we used in this study, we found that the use of multiple breath washout with short extension (MBW<sub>ShX</sub>) to be the best nonimaging method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多次呼吸冲洗法(MBW)成功地评估了无声肺区,尤其是在囊性纤维化肺病中,但它仅限于沟通肺。有许多不同的肺功能方法可以评估通常所说的滞留空气,其方法和灵敏度各不相同。25 名囊性纤维化患者(pwCF)在同一天接受了 MBW、肺活量测定、体温测定和肺活量控制计算机断层扫描(spiro-CT)检查。PwCF 还对 MBW 进行了扩展,以评估空气潴留,包括我们的新扩展(MBWShX),它可以显示通气不足肺单位(UVLU)的范围。此外,我们还使用了之前建立的 2 种 5 次呼吸方法,这些方法可提供潴留气体体积 (VTG)。我们将螺旋 CT 得出的滞留空气百分比作为黄金标准进行比较。从 MBWShX 得出的 UVLU 与滞留空气百分比的相关性(RS 0.89)、PShX 与螺旋 CT 的相关性(RS 0.89)和灵敏度(RS 0.89)来看,MBWShX 与滞留空气百分比的一致性最好,与本研究中评估的其他肺功能方法相比,PShX 的灵敏度也最高。MBWShX 显示了评估和监测这一关键病理生理特征的前景,该特征已被证明是 pwCF 肺部疾病进展的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Silence of the lungs: comparing measures of slow and noncommunicating lung units from pulmonary function tests with computed tomography.

Multiple breath washout (MBW) has successfully assessed the silent lung zone particularly in cystic fibrosis lung disease, however, it is limited to the communicating lung only. There are a number of different pulmonary function methods that can assess what is commonly referred to as trapped air, with varying approaches and sensitivity. Twenty-five people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) underwent MBW, spirometry, body plethysmography, and spirometry-controlled computed tomography (spiro-CT) on the same day. PwCF also performed extensions to MBW that evaluate air trapping, including our novel extension (MBWShX), which reveals the extent of underventilated lung units (UVLU). In addition, we used two previously established 5-breath methods that provide a volume of trapped gas (VTG). We used trapped air % from spiro-CT as the gold standard for comparison. UVLU derived from MBWShX showed the best agreement with trapped air %, both in terms of correlation (RS 0.89, P < 0.0001) and sensitivity (79%). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a significant underestimation of the VTG by both 5-breath methods (-249 mL [95% CI -10,796; 580 mL] and -203 mL [95% CI -997; 591 mL], respectively). Parameters from both spirometry and body plethysmography were suboptimal at assessing this pathophysiology. The parameters from MBWShX demonstrated the best relationship with spiro-CT and had the best sensitivity compared with the other pulmonary function methods assessed in this study. MBWShX shows promise to assess and monitor this critical pathophysiological feature, which has been shown to be a driver of lung disease progression in pwCF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We consider the term "trapped air" either in the use of imaging or pulmonary function testing, something of a misnomer that can lead to an inaccurate assessment of an important physiological feature. Instead, we propose the term underventilated lung units (UVLU). Of the many pulmonary function methods we used in this study, we found that the use of multiple breath washout with short extension (MBWShX) to be the best nonimaging method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信