用生理盐水还是次氯酸钠冲洗牙髓?一项非劣效性随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hataichanok Machareonsap, Papimon Chompu-Inwai, Nattakan Chaipattanawan, Chanika Manmontri, Areerat Nirunsittirat, Phichayut Phinyo
{"title":"用生理盐水还是次氯酸钠冲洗牙髓?一项非劣效性随机对照试验。","authors":"Hataichanok Machareonsap, Papimon Chompu-Inwai, Nattakan Chaipattanawan, Chanika Manmontri, Areerat Nirunsittirat, Phichayut Phinyo","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.30932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"180-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hataichanok Machareonsap, Papimon Chompu-Inwai, Nattakan Chaipattanawan, Chanika Manmontri, Areerat Nirunsittirat, Phichayut Phinyo\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2023.30932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"180-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.30932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.30932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每种冲洗剂的标准都是随机的,NaOCl 组 65 人,NSS 组 60 人。两组均使用 ProRoot® MTA 作为牙髓敷料,并对牙齿进行为期 12 个月的随访。主要结果是 VPT 的成功率;要求临床和放射学均成功才算成功。假设 NSS 组 VPT 成功率的绝对差异不低于 NaOCl 组的 5%。次要结果是变色;比较两组变色的百分比。结果:根据方案分析,NSS 组和 NaOCl 组 VPT 成功率的绝对差异为 2.08%(95% CI:-1.95, 6.1)。NaOCl 组和 NSS 组的可感知灰色变色分别为 80% 和 63%(差异 -17%;95% CI:-40.0,6.2;P=0.15)。结论对于 MTA-VPT 手术,使用 NSS 冲洗并不比使用 NaOCl 差。然而,两种冲洗剂都会导致变色。(EEJ-2023-05-065)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normal Saline or Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation for Vital Pulp Therapy? A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

criteria were randomized to each irrigant, 65 in the NaOCl and 60 in the NSS groups. ProRoot® MTA was used as a pulp dressing material in both groups and teeth were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the success of VPT; requiring both clinical and radiographic success to be considered as success. The hypothesis was that the absolute difference of VPT success in the NSS group was not worse than that in the NaOCl group, by a margin of 5%. The secondary outcome was discoloration; percentages of discolorations between both groups were compared. Results: Using a per protocol analysis, the absolute difference of VPT success between the NSS and NaOCl groups was 2.08% (95% CI: -1.95, 6.1). Perceptible gray discolorations were 80% and 63% in NaOCl and NSS groups (difference -17%; 95% CI: -40.0, 6.2; p=0.15). Conclusions: For MTA-VPT procedure, irrigation with NSS was not worse than that with NaOCl. However, both irrigants caused discoloration. (EEJ-2023-05-065).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信