Francesco Misirocchi, Hervé Quintard, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Karl Schaller, Jérôme Pugin, Margitta Seeck, Pia De Stefano
{"title":"ICU 脑电图室可改善癫痫状态患者的预后:一项前后回顾性研究","authors":"Francesco Misirocchi, Hervé Quintard, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Karl Schaller, Jérôme Pugin, Margitta Seeck, Pia De Stefano","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term \"continuous monitoring\" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective before-after study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e545-e556"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Misirocchi, Hervé Quintard, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Karl Schaller, Jérôme Pugin, Margitta Seeck, Pia De Stefano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term \\\"continuous monitoring\\\" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective before-after study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e545-e556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006393\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006393","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:连续脑电图(cEEG)监测被推荐用于重症监护病房的癫痫状态(SE)管理,但由于资源限制和有关其对预后影响的不确定证据,目前仍未得到充分利用。此外,"持续监测 "一词通常意味着持续记录,间歇性复查不固定。建立专门的 ICU 脑电图室可以填补这一空白,使脑电图几乎可以实时复查,并实现多学科管理协作。本研究旨在评估建立 ICU 脑电图室对 SE 结果和管理的影响:设计:单中心前后回顾性研究:患者:接受非低氧血症治疗的成人患者:干预措施:无:测量和主要结果:对所有 SE 患者的数据进行了评估,并对引入 ICU 脑电图室之前和之后接受治疗的患者进行了比较。主要结果是神经功能恢复到病前水平、ICU死亡率、SE持续时间和ICU SE管理。次要结果是 SE 类型和病因。研究共纳入了 277 例 SE 患者,其中 149 例(72%)发生在 ICU 脑电图室建立之前,58 例(38%)发生在 ICU 脑电图室建立之后。ICU 脑电图室的设立与非惊厥性 SE(p = 0.003)和急性症状病因 SE(p = 0.019)的检出率增加有关。考虑到年龄、合并症、SE病因和SE病理的回归分析表明,引入ICU-脑电图室后,恢复到病前神经功能的几率更高(p = 0.002),SE持续时间缩短(p = 0.024),SE管理发生转变,抗癫痫药物的使用增加(p = 0.007):结论:通过建立 ICU 脑电图室并进行几乎实时的 cEEG 检查,将神经病学的专业知识融入 ICU 环境中,缩短了 SE 的持续时间,增加了恢复到病前神经功能的可能性,同时增加了抗癫痫药物的使用次数。我们需要进一步研究来验证这些发现并评估长期预后。
ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study.
Objectives: Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.
Setting: Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.
Patients: Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.
Interventions: None.
Measurement and main results: Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.
Conclusions: Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.