重新思考临床免疫原性评估的现行模式:欧洲生物分析论坛讨论的最新情况。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Joanne Goodman, Kyra J Cowan, Michaela Golob, Robert Nelson, Daniel Baltrukonis, Karien Bloem, Brendy Van Butsel, Lysie Champion, John Cook, Minh Dang, Desislava Galeva, Davide Guerrieri, Gregor Jordan, Carsten Krantz, Ching-Hai Lai, Toralf Roch, Adriano Luis Soares de Sonza, Lauren Stevenson, Luis Perez Tosar, Foka Venema, Hanna Widmaier, Philip Timmerman
{"title":"重新思考临床免疫原性评估的现行模式:欧洲生物分析论坛讨论的最新情况。","authors":"Joanne Goodman, Kyra J Cowan, Michaela Golob, Robert Nelson, Daniel Baltrukonis, Karien Bloem, Brendy Van Butsel, Lysie Champion, John Cook, Minh Dang, Desislava Galeva, Davide Guerrieri, Gregor Jordan, Carsten Krantz, Ching-Hai Lai, Toralf Roch, Adriano Luis Soares de Sonza, Lauren Stevenson, Luis Perez Tosar, Foka Venema, Hanna Widmaier, Philip Timmerman","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2024.2376949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunogenicity regulatory guidance and industry recommendations have evolved over the last two decades since unexpected immune reactions were first reported with erythropoietin. Since then, the guidelines and practices for immunogenicity have stemmed from a reaction to a high-risk molecule causing significant clinical impact. Similar thinking is often applied to all biotherapeutic drugs, even when a well-defined risk assessment suggests otherwise. In recent years, the current testing paradigm for immunogenicity has been challenged with more informative approaches being proposed. In a Focus Workshop held by the European Bioanalysis Forum in September 2023, the current immunogenicity testing paradigm was challenged based on the experience and learning of 20+ years of immunogenicity strategies. The workshop recommendations proposed a new paradigm, challenging the value of multiple tiers depending on the immunogenicity risk assessment based on context of use and moving toward treating immunogenicity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for the drug. Such rethinking ultimately results in the appropriate and efficient focusing of resources on immunogenicity testing strategies that benefit patients most, moving to a new paradigm where implementation of appropriate and truly informative immunogenicity testing strategies, depending on the context-of-use, become the norm .</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-thinking the current paradigm for clinical immunogenicity assessment: an update from the discussion in the European Bioanalysis Forum.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Goodman, Kyra J Cowan, Michaela Golob, Robert Nelson, Daniel Baltrukonis, Karien Bloem, Brendy Van Butsel, Lysie Champion, John Cook, Minh Dang, Desislava Galeva, Davide Guerrieri, Gregor Jordan, Carsten Krantz, Ching-Hai Lai, Toralf Roch, Adriano Luis Soares de Sonza, Lauren Stevenson, Luis Perez Tosar, Foka Venema, Hanna Widmaier, Philip Timmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2024.2376949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immunogenicity regulatory guidance and industry recommendations have evolved over the last two decades since unexpected immune reactions were first reported with erythropoietin. Since then, the guidelines and practices for immunogenicity have stemmed from a reaction to a high-risk molecule causing significant clinical impact. Similar thinking is often applied to all biotherapeutic drugs, even when a well-defined risk assessment suggests otherwise. In recent years, the current testing paradigm for immunogenicity has been challenged with more informative approaches being proposed. In a Focus Workshop held by the European Bioanalysis Forum in September 2023, the current immunogenicity testing paradigm was challenged based on the experience and learning of 20+ years of immunogenicity strategies. The workshop recommendations proposed a new paradigm, challenging the value of multiple tiers depending on the immunogenicity risk assessment based on context of use and moving toward treating immunogenicity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for the drug. Such rethinking ultimately results in the appropriate and efficient focusing of resources on immunogenicity testing strategies that benefit patients most, moving to a new paradigm where implementation of appropriate and truly informative immunogenicity testing strategies, depending on the context-of-use, become the norm .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2376949\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2376949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自首次报道红细胞生成素出现意外免疫反应以来,免疫原性监管指南和行业建议在过去二十年中不断发展。从那时起,免疫原性的指导原则和实践就源于对高风险分子的反应,这种反应造成了重大的临床影响。类似的想法通常也适用于所有生物治疗药物,即使明确的风险评估结果表明并非如此。近年来,当前的免疫原性测试范式受到了挑战,人们提出了更多具有参考价值的方法。在欧洲生物分析论坛于 2023 年 9 月举办的焦点研讨会上,基于 20 多年免疫原性策略的经验和教训,当前的免疫原性测试范式受到了挑战。研讨会的建议提出了一种新的范式,挑战了根据使用环境进行免疫原性风险评估的多层次价值,并转向将免疫原性作为药物的药效学生物标志物。这种反思的最终结果是将资源适当而有效地集中在对患者最有益的免疫原性检测策略上,从而形成一种新的范式,即根据使用环境实施适当而真正有参考价值的免疫原性检测策略成为常态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-thinking the current paradigm for clinical immunogenicity assessment: an update from the discussion in the European Bioanalysis Forum.

Immunogenicity regulatory guidance and industry recommendations have evolved over the last two decades since unexpected immune reactions were first reported with erythropoietin. Since then, the guidelines and practices for immunogenicity have stemmed from a reaction to a high-risk molecule causing significant clinical impact. Similar thinking is often applied to all biotherapeutic drugs, even when a well-defined risk assessment suggests otherwise. In recent years, the current testing paradigm for immunogenicity has been challenged with more informative approaches being proposed. In a Focus Workshop held by the European Bioanalysis Forum in September 2023, the current immunogenicity testing paradigm was challenged based on the experience and learning of 20+ years of immunogenicity strategies. The workshop recommendations proposed a new paradigm, challenging the value of multiple tiers depending on the immunogenicity risk assessment based on context of use and moving toward treating immunogenicity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for the drug. Such rethinking ultimately results in the appropriate and efficient focusing of resources on immunogenicity testing strategies that benefit patients most, moving to a new paradigm where implementation of appropriate and truly informative immunogenicity testing strategies, depending on the context-of-use, become the norm .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信