Representation of Low- and Middle-Income Countries in CKD Drug Trials: A Systematic Review.

Rationale & objective: Almost 80% of individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and are potentially under-represented in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). We assessed the global distribution of RCTs comparing pharmacological treatments for CKD over the past two decades, as well as the magnitude and evolution of participation by LMICs.

Study design: Systematic review.

Setting & study populations: RCTs evaluating pharmacological interventions in adults with CKD.

Selection criteria for studies: RCTs published between 2003-2023 and indexed in MEDLINE.

Data extraction: Each trial was reviewed and extracted independently by two investigators. Disagreements were settled by consensus or a third reviewer.

Analytical approach: RCT participation of World Bank-defined income groups and geographic regions were described and the representation indices (RI) according to RCT participants and estimated CKD prevalences were calculated. RCTs were also categorized as global, regional, or national in scope.

Results: Among 7,760 identified studies, we included 1,366 RCTs conducted in 84 countries with 301,158 participants. National, regional, and global RCTs represented 85.4%, 3.5%, and 11.1% of studies, respectively. LMICs were included in 34.7% of RCTs. No RCTs included participants from low-income countries, and lower-middle-income countries participated in 13.2%. Of participants from RCTs with available information, 25.4% (n=64,843/255,237) were from LMICs. According to the RI, six LMICs were over-represented (>1.25), seven adequately represented (0.75-1.25), and 26 under-represented (<0.75). Most (80.2%) global CKD RCTs included LMICs; however, LMIC participants constituted only 32.9% of the global trial population. We observed a positive trend in LMIC inclusion over time, rising from 22.9% (n=71/310) in 2003-2007 to 45.5% (n=140/308) in 2018-2023.

Limitations: The use of an income-group dichotomy, exclusion of non-randomized studies of intervention, and studies identified in one database.

Conclusions: Despite an increase in participation over the past two decades, individuals with CKD from LMICs remain significantly under-represented in RCTs. These findings suggest that increased efforts are warranted to increase LMIC representation in pharmacological CKD RCTs.