Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Fabricated with Four Different Computer-Aided Manufacturing Techniques.

Purpose: The improvement of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) has changed the methods of fabricating laminate veneers. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of ceramic veneers manufactured with different CAD/CAM techniques. Materials and methods: A metal die was made by copying a prepared plastic maxillary central right incisor and scanned for designing a laminate veneer. One hundred laminate veneers were made with four different CAD/CAM techniques (n=25), including milled lithium disilicate (MLD), heat-pressed lithium disilicate with 3-dimensional (3D) printed wax patterns (PLD), milled zirconia (MZ), and 3Dprinted zirconia (PZ). The virtual marginal and internal fit of fabricated veneers was evaluated with digital crown fitting software. The actual marginal and internal fit was measured with the silicone replica method under a digital microscope. The measured data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance and the Turkey test. Results: There were significant differences in marginal and internal fit (P < 0.001) among manufacturing techniques. Both the virtual and actual marginal and internal gaps were higher in the PLD and PZ groups compared to the MLD and MZ groups. Conclusion: All four CAD/CAM techniques of manufacturing veneers, that is, milled lithium disilicate, heat-pressed lithium disilicate with 3D-printed wax patterns, milled zirconia, and 3D-printed zirconia, have clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit. Milled zirconia and lithium disilicate veneers demonstrated superior marginal and internal fit compared to 3D-printed zirconia and heat-pressed lithium disilicate veneers with 3D-printed wax patterns.