基于人群的大型(大于 7 厘米)非小细胞肺癌肿瘤局部疗法分析。

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Deven C Patel, Hao He, Douglas Z Liou, Pau J Speicher, Mark F Berry
{"title":"基于人群的大型(大于 7 厘米)非小细胞肺癌肿瘤局部疗法分析。","authors":"Deven C Patel, Hao He, Douglas Z Liou, Pau J Speicher, Mark F Berry","doi":"10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of local treatment modalities in the management of large non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors using a nationwide population-based dataset. Patients with NSCLC tumors >7 cm that were cN0-1M0 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 2010 to 2015 were stratified by local management strategy (surgery, radiation therapy, no local treatment) and evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, Cox proportional-hazard methods, and propensity-matched analysis. A total of 3156 patients were identified, of which 1580 (50.1%) underwent surgical resection, 920 (29.2%) received radiation only, 655 (20.7%) received no local treatment. Overall, the 5-year survival of patients undergoing surgical resection was 40.7%, compared to 14.7% and 5.3% for the radiation only and no local treatment groups, respectively (P < .001). Surgery with or without radiation continued to have an independent association with improved survival in multivariable analysis (HR 0.23, P < .0001). Other factors associated with improved survival included younger age, negative nodal disease, and chemotherapy use. In propensity-matched sub-analyses, 5-year survival remained significantly better after surgery alone compared to radiation alone (38.5% vs. 13.6%, P < .001), while survival after radiation alone was better than no local treatment, though both were largely poor (12.4% vs. 7.5%, P < .001). Survival of patients with large NSCLC managed non-surgically is very poor. Despite the significant long-term survival benefit with surgical intervention, nearly half of the study cohort did not undergo surgery. Patients and clinicians can use these results to estimate specific potential benefits when considering possible treatment strategies for large NSCLC tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":"25 4","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population-Based Analysis of Local Therapies for Large (>7 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Deven C Patel, Hao He, Douglas Z Liou, Pau J Speicher, Mark F Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of local treatment modalities in the management of large non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors using a nationwide population-based dataset. Patients with NSCLC tumors >7 cm that were cN0-1M0 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 2010 to 2015 were stratified by local management strategy (surgery, radiation therapy, no local treatment) and evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, Cox proportional-hazard methods, and propensity-matched analysis. A total of 3156 patients were identified, of which 1580 (50.1%) underwent surgical resection, 920 (29.2%) received radiation only, 655 (20.7%) received no local treatment. Overall, the 5-year survival of patients undergoing surgical resection was 40.7%, compared to 14.7% and 5.3% for the radiation only and no local treatment groups, respectively (P < .001). Surgery with or without radiation continued to have an independent association with improved survival in multivariable analysis (HR 0.23, P < .0001). Other factors associated with improved survival included younger age, negative nodal disease, and chemotherapy use. In propensity-matched sub-analyses, 5-year survival remained significantly better after surgery alone compared to radiation alone (38.5% vs. 13.6%, P < .001), while survival after radiation alone was better than no local treatment, though both were largely poor (12.4% vs. 7.5%, P < .001). Survival of patients with large NSCLC managed non-surgically is very poor. Despite the significant long-term survival benefit with surgical intervention, nearly half of the study cohort did not undergo surgery. Patients and clinicians can use these results to estimate specific potential benefits when considering possible treatment strategies for large NSCLC tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"141-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用全国范围内的人群数据集评估了局部治疗模式对大型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)肿瘤治疗的影响。根据局部治疗策略(手术、放疗、无局部治疗)对2010年至2015年期间监测、流行病学和终末结果(SEER)登记的NSCLC肿瘤大于7厘米且为cN0-1M0的患者进行了分层,并采用卡普兰-梅耶生存分析、Cox比例危险法和倾向匹配分析进行了评估。共确定了 3156 例患者,其中 1580 例(50.1%)接受了手术切除,920 例(29.2%)仅接受了放射治疗,655 例(20.7%)未接受局部治疗。总体而言,接受手术切除的患者的5年生存率为40.7%,而只接受放射治疗组和未接受局部治疗组的5年生存率分别为14.7%和5.3%(P < .001)。在多变量分析中,手术加或不加放射治疗与生存率的提高仍有独立联系(HR 0.23,P < .0001)。其他与生存率提高相关的因素包括年龄较小、结节阴性疾病和化疗的使用。在倾向匹配子分析中,与单纯放疗相比,单纯手术后的5年生存率仍然明显更高(38.5% vs. 13.6%,P < .001),而单纯放疗后的生存率则优于未进行局部治疗的患者,尽管两者的生存率都很低(12.4% vs. 7.5%,P < .001)。非手术治疗的大型 NSCLC 患者的生存率非常低。尽管手术干预能显著提高长期生存率,但研究队列中仍有近一半的患者没有接受手术治疗。患者和临床医生在考虑大块NSCLC肿瘤的可能治疗策略时,可以利用这些结果来估计具体的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Population-Based Analysis of Local Therapies for Large (>7 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.

Population-Based Analysis of Local Therapies for Large (>7 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.

Population-Based Analysis of Local Therapies for Large (>7 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.

Population-Based Analysis of Local Therapies for Large (>7 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.

This study evaluated the impact of local treatment modalities in the management of large non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors using a nationwide population-based dataset. Patients with NSCLC tumors >7 cm that were cN0-1M0 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 2010 to 2015 were stratified by local management strategy (surgery, radiation therapy, no local treatment) and evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, Cox proportional-hazard methods, and propensity-matched analysis. A total of 3156 patients were identified, of which 1580 (50.1%) underwent surgical resection, 920 (29.2%) received radiation only, 655 (20.7%) received no local treatment. Overall, the 5-year survival of patients undergoing surgical resection was 40.7%, compared to 14.7% and 5.3% for the radiation only and no local treatment groups, respectively (P < .001). Surgery with or without radiation continued to have an independent association with improved survival in multivariable analysis (HR 0.23, P < .0001). Other factors associated with improved survival included younger age, negative nodal disease, and chemotherapy use. In propensity-matched sub-analyses, 5-year survival remained significantly better after surgery alone compared to radiation alone (38.5% vs. 13.6%, P < .001), while survival after radiation alone was better than no local treatment, though both were largely poor (12.4% vs. 7.5%, P < .001). Survival of patients with large NSCLC managed non-surgically is very poor. Despite the significant long-term survival benefit with surgical intervention, nearly half of the study cohort did not undergo surgery. Patients and clinicians can use these results to estimate specific potential benefits when considering possible treatment strategies for large NSCLC tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信