Wilson T Trusty, Brett E Scofield, Rebecca A Janis, Alaina L Cummins, Tyler D White
{"title":"大学心理咨询中心的心理治疗剂量、临床效果和退学情况。","authors":"Wilson T Trusty, Brett E Scofield, Rebecca A Janis, Alaina L Cummins, Tyler D White","doi":"10.1037/ser0000895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Academic withdrawal from colleges and universities is a common occurrence, particularly among students with mental health concerns. Receiving a successful course of psychotherapy may reduce students' risk of academic withdrawal, but outcomes in university counseling centers (UCCs) could be hindered by strategies used to meet high service demands with limited resources, such as offering a low number or frequency of sessions. The present study examined associations among psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal among students (<i>N</i> = 16,197) in short-term individual psychotherapy at 85 UCCs in the United States. Structural equation modeling results indicated that after controlling for baseline psychological distress, the number of psychotherapy sessions attended positively predicted, and the average number of days between sessions negatively predicted, clients' self-reported reductions in psychological distress. In turn, after controlling for pretreatment characteristics associated with academic withdrawal (prior psychiatric hospitalization, gender, academic distress) reductions in psychological distress negatively predicted therapists' report of clients voluntarily withdrawing from their academic institution during psychotherapy. This indicates that students who receive higher psychotherapy doses within a short-term context (i.e., 10 or fewer sessions) are less distressed by the end of treatment, which then predicts a lower likelihood of academic withdrawal during psychotherapy. UCC leadership and clinicians might enhance clinical and academic outcomes by providing flexibility in the number and frequency of psychotherapy sessions available to students. However, centers may need additional resources from their academic institutions to provide this flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal at university counseling centers.\",\"authors\":\"Wilson T Trusty, Brett E Scofield, Rebecca A Janis, Alaina L Cummins, Tyler D White\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Academic withdrawal from colleges and universities is a common occurrence, particularly among students with mental health concerns. Receiving a successful course of psychotherapy may reduce students' risk of academic withdrawal, but outcomes in university counseling centers (UCCs) could be hindered by strategies used to meet high service demands with limited resources, such as offering a low number or frequency of sessions. The present study examined associations among psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal among students (<i>N</i> = 16,197) in short-term individual psychotherapy at 85 UCCs in the United States. Structural equation modeling results indicated that after controlling for baseline psychological distress, the number of psychotherapy sessions attended positively predicted, and the average number of days between sessions negatively predicted, clients' self-reported reductions in psychological distress. In turn, after controlling for pretreatment characteristics associated with academic withdrawal (prior psychiatric hospitalization, gender, academic distress) reductions in psychological distress negatively predicted therapists' report of clients voluntarily withdrawing from their academic institution during psychotherapy. This indicates that students who receive higher psychotherapy doses within a short-term context (i.e., 10 or fewer sessions) are less distressed by the end of treatment, which then predicts a lower likelihood of academic withdrawal during psychotherapy. UCC leadership and clinicians might enhance clinical and academic outcomes by providing flexibility in the number and frequency of psychotherapy sessions available to students. However, centers may need additional resources from their academic institutions to provide this flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000895\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从高校退学是一种常见现象,尤其是在有心理健康问题的学生中。接受成功的心理治疗可能会降低学生退学的风险,但大学心理咨询中心(UCCs)为满足有限资源下的高服务需求而采取的策略(如提供较少的治疗次数或频率)可能会影响治疗效果。本研究考察了在美国85所大学心理咨询中心接受短期个体心理治疗的学生(人数=16197人)中心理治疗剂量、临床结果和退学之间的关系。结构方程建模结果表明,在控制了基线心理压力后,心理治疗的疗程次数对患者自我报告的心理压力减轻情况有正向预测作用,而疗程之间的平均间隔天数对患者自我报告的心理压力减轻情况有负向预测作用。反过来,在控制了与学业退学相关的治疗前特征(之前的精神病院治疗、性别、学业困扰)后,心理困扰的减轻对治疗师报告的客户在心理治疗期间自愿从学业机构退学的情况有负向预测作用。这表明,在短期内(即 10 次或更少疗程)接受较高剂量心理治疗的学生,在治疗结束时的心理压力较小,从而预示着在心理治疗期间退学的可能性较低。心理治疗中心的领导和临床医生可以通过灵活调整学生接受心理治疗的次数和频率来提高临床和学业成绩。不过,中心可能需要从其学术机构获得额外资源,以提供这种灵活性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal at university counseling centers.
Academic withdrawal from colleges and universities is a common occurrence, particularly among students with mental health concerns. Receiving a successful course of psychotherapy may reduce students' risk of academic withdrawal, but outcomes in university counseling centers (UCCs) could be hindered by strategies used to meet high service demands with limited resources, such as offering a low number or frequency of sessions. The present study examined associations among psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal among students (N = 16,197) in short-term individual psychotherapy at 85 UCCs in the United States. Structural equation modeling results indicated that after controlling for baseline psychological distress, the number of psychotherapy sessions attended positively predicted, and the average number of days between sessions negatively predicted, clients' self-reported reductions in psychological distress. In turn, after controlling for pretreatment characteristics associated with academic withdrawal (prior psychiatric hospitalization, gender, academic distress) reductions in psychological distress negatively predicted therapists' report of clients voluntarily withdrawing from their academic institution during psychotherapy. This indicates that students who receive higher psychotherapy doses within a short-term context (i.e., 10 or fewer sessions) are less distressed by the end of treatment, which then predicts a lower likelihood of academic withdrawal during psychotherapy. UCC leadership and clinicians might enhance clinical and academic outcomes by providing flexibility in the number and frequency of psychotherapy sessions available to students. However, centers may need additional resources from their academic institutions to provide this flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.