在恶性远端胆道梗阻患者中联合使用 EUS 和 ERCP 与单独使用 ERCP 和取样相比,可缩短肿瘤治疗时间。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
James Gauci, Wei On, Bharat Paranandi, Matthew Huggett, Simon Everett
{"title":"在恶性远端胆道梗阻患者中联合使用 EUS 和 ERCP 与单独使用 ERCP 和取样相比,可缩短肿瘤治疗时间。","authors":"James Gauci, Wei On, Bharat Paranandi, Matthew Huggett, Simon Everett","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Standard ERCP sampling techniques for pancreaticobiliary malignancy have modest yields that could lead to delays in treatment. We aimed to evaluate whether combining EUS guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with ERCP versus ERCP alone at the time of index procedure improved time to first outpatient evaluation and oncological treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients without a prior pathological diagnosis who underwent index ERCP at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom, for malignant distal biliary obstruction from 2015 to 2020 were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 patients were included, of whom 74.7% (n = 202) underwent EUS-TA/ERCP. A combined approach was more likely to establish a positive diagnosis (96.5% (n = 195) vs 57.8% (n = 52), p < 0.01) and less likely to require further sampling procedures (2.0% (n = 4) vs 17.8% (n = 16), p < 0.01). Mean times to first outpatient evaluation (16.9 vs 24.5 days (p = 0.01)) and oncological treatment (55.1 vs 79.3 days (p = 0.03)) were significantly shorter in the EUS-TA/ERCP group. A third (n = 86) of patients with a positive diagnosis did not receive oncological/surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of patients, a combined approach was associated with improved diagnostic yield, reduced need for repeat sampling procedures and reduced time to evaluation and treatment, with similar therapeutic success and adverse event rates. Careful multidisciplinary discussion is recommended to avoid performing unnecessary EUS procedures on patients who will not benefit from further treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19733,"journal":{"name":"Pancreas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined EUS and ERCP in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction is associated with reduced time to oncological therapy compared to ERCP and sampling alone.\",\"authors\":\"James Gauci, Wei On, Bharat Paranandi, Matthew Huggett, Simon Everett\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Standard ERCP sampling techniques for pancreaticobiliary malignancy have modest yields that could lead to delays in treatment. We aimed to evaluate whether combining EUS guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with ERCP versus ERCP alone at the time of index procedure improved time to first outpatient evaluation and oncological treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients without a prior pathological diagnosis who underwent index ERCP at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom, for malignant distal biliary obstruction from 2015 to 2020 were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 patients were included, of whom 74.7% (n = 202) underwent EUS-TA/ERCP. A combined approach was more likely to establish a positive diagnosis (96.5% (n = 195) vs 57.8% (n = 52), p < 0.01) and less likely to require further sampling procedures (2.0% (n = 4) vs 17.8% (n = 16), p < 0.01). Mean times to first outpatient evaluation (16.9 vs 24.5 days (p = 0.01)) and oncological treatment (55.1 vs 79.3 days (p = 0.03)) were significantly shorter in the EUS-TA/ERCP group. A third (n = 86) of patients with a positive diagnosis did not receive oncological/surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of patients, a combined approach was associated with improved diagnostic yield, reduced need for repeat sampling procedures and reduced time to evaluation and treatment, with similar therapeutic success and adverse event rates. Careful multidisciplinary discussion is recommended to avoid performing unnecessary EUS procedures on patients who will not benefit from further treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胰胆管恶性肿瘤的标准ERCP取样技术产量不高,可能导致治疗延误。我们的目的是评估ERCP与EUS引导下组织采集(EUS-TA)相结合与单纯ERCP相结合是否能缩短首次门诊评估和肿瘤治疗的时间:方法:研究对象为2015年至2020年期间在英国利兹教学医院NHS信托基金接受ERCP手术的所有恶性远端胆道梗阻患者,这些患者均未进行病理诊断:共纳入292名患者,其中74.7%(n = 202)接受了EUS-TA/ERCP检查。联合方法更有可能确定阳性诊断(96.5%(n = 195)vs 57.8%(n = 52),p < 0.01),而且需要进一步取样的可能性较小(2.0%(n = 4)vs 17.8%(n = 16),p < 0.01)。EUS-TA/ERCP组患者首次门诊评估(16.9天 vs 24.5天(P = 0.01))和肿瘤治疗(55.1天 vs 79.3天(P = 0.03))的平均时间明显更短。三分之一(n = 86)的阳性诊断患者没有接受肿瘤/手术治疗:结论:在我们的患者队列中,联合方法提高了诊断率,减少了重复取样程序的需要,缩短了评估和治疗时间,同时治疗成功率和不良事件发生率相似。建议进行仔细的多学科讨论,以避免对无法从进一步治疗中获益的患者进行不必要的 EUS 手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined EUS and ERCP in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction is associated with reduced time to oncological therapy compared to ERCP and sampling alone.

Objectives: Standard ERCP sampling techniques for pancreaticobiliary malignancy have modest yields that could lead to delays in treatment. We aimed to evaluate whether combining EUS guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with ERCP versus ERCP alone at the time of index procedure improved time to first outpatient evaluation and oncological treatment.

Methods: All patients without a prior pathological diagnosis who underwent index ERCP at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom, for malignant distal biliary obstruction from 2015 to 2020 were considered.

Results: A total of 292 patients were included, of whom 74.7% (n = 202) underwent EUS-TA/ERCP. A combined approach was more likely to establish a positive diagnosis (96.5% (n = 195) vs 57.8% (n = 52), p < 0.01) and less likely to require further sampling procedures (2.0% (n = 4) vs 17.8% (n = 16), p < 0.01). Mean times to first outpatient evaluation (16.9 vs 24.5 days (p = 0.01)) and oncological treatment (55.1 vs 79.3 days (p = 0.03)) were significantly shorter in the EUS-TA/ERCP group. A third (n = 86) of patients with a positive diagnosis did not receive oncological/surgical treatment.

Conclusions: In our cohort of patients, a combined approach was associated with improved diagnostic yield, reduced need for repeat sampling procedures and reduced time to evaluation and treatment, with similar therapeutic success and adverse event rates. Careful multidisciplinary discussion is recommended to avoid performing unnecessary EUS procedures on patients who will not benefit from further treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreas
Pancreas 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
289
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pancreas provides a central forum for communication of original works involving both basic and clinical research on the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and their interrelationships and consequences in disease states. This multidisciplinary, international journal covers the whole spectrum of basic sciences, etiology, prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical and medical management of pancreatic diseases, including cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信