[影响普通精神科急症监护室约束频率的机构和患者相关因素]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Miriam Paetzold, Kathrin Kuhr, Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt
{"title":"[影响普通精神科急症监护室约束频率的机构和患者相关因素]。","authors":"Miriam Paetzold, Kathrin Kuhr, Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt","doi":"10.1055/a-2365-0878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Valid knowledge about risk stratification is essential for the development of preventive approaches to reduce restraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>  This retrospective, monocentric study examined all 248 restraining measures used on 79 patients of a university psychiatric department in 2015. Eight institutional and seven patient-related factors were statistically calculated using logistic regression analysis and matched pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant increased probability of fixation was found in connection with a lower number of nurses per patient, a higher number of patients admitted by law, lower professional experience of nurses and in the nursing late shift as well as when admission occurred via emergency medical service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, possible preventive organizational measures are elaborated and preconditions for a prospective evaluation of the complex factors influencing coercive measures are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Institutional and patient-related factors influencing the frequency of restraint in a general psychiatric acute care unit].\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Paetzold, Kathrin Kuhr, Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2365-0878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Valid knowledge about risk stratification is essential for the development of preventive approaches to reduce restraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>  This retrospective, monocentric study examined all 248 restraining measures used on 79 patients of a university psychiatric department in 2015. Eight institutional and seven patient-related factors were statistically calculated using logistic regression analysis and matched pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant increased probability of fixation was found in connection with a lower number of nurses per patient, a higher number of patients admitted by law, lower professional experience of nurses and in the nursing late shift as well as when admission occurred via emergency medical service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, possible preventive organizational measures are elaborated and preconditions for a prospective evaluation of the complex factors influencing coercive measures are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2365-0878\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2365-0878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的有效的风险分层知识对于制定减少限制措施的预防方法至关重要:这项回顾性、单中心研究考察了 2015 年某大学精神科对 79 名患者使用的全部 248 种限制措施。采用逻辑回归分析和配对方法对八个机构因素和七个患者相关因素进行了统计计算:结果发现,与每名患者的护士人数较少、依法入院的患者人数较多、护士的专业经验较少、护理晚班以及通过紧急医疗服务入院的患者有关的固定概率在统计学上显着增加:根据研究结果,阐述了可能的预防性组织措施,并讨论了对影响强制措施的复杂因素进行前瞻性评估的前提条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Institutional and patient-related factors influencing the frequency of restraint in a general psychiatric acute care unit].

Objective: Valid knowledge about risk stratification is essential for the development of preventive approaches to reduce restraints.

Methods:   This retrospective, monocentric study examined all 248 restraining measures used on 79 patients of a university psychiatric department in 2015. Eight institutional and seven patient-related factors were statistically calculated using logistic regression analysis and matched pairs.

Results: A statistically significant increased probability of fixation was found in connection with a lower number of nurses per patient, a higher number of patients admitted by law, lower professional experience of nurses and in the nursing late shift as well as when admission occurred via emergency medical service.

Conclusion: Based on the results, possible preventive organizational measures are elaborated and preconditions for a prospective evaluation of the complex factors influencing coercive measures are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信