通过快速多重 PCR 检测法检测呼吸道病原体对儿科急诊室儿童社区获得性肺炎治疗的影响。随机对照试验:OPTIPAC 研究。

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Aymeric Cantais, Sylvie Pillet, Josselin Rigaill, François Angoulvant, Christele Gras-Le-Guen, Pierrick Cros, Charlotte Thuiller, Claudine Molly, Louise Tripodi, Aurélie Desbree, Nadine Annino, Paul Verhoeven, Anne Carricajo, Thomas Bourlet, Céline Chapelle, Isabelle Claudet, Arnauld Garcin, Jacques Izopet, Olivier Mory, Bruno Pozzetto
{"title":"通过快速多重 PCR 检测法检测呼吸道病原体对儿科急诊室儿童社区获得性肺炎治疗的影响。随机对照试验:OPTIPAC 研究。","authors":"Aymeric Cantais, Sylvie Pillet, Josselin Rigaill, François Angoulvant, Christele Gras-Le-Guen, Pierrick Cros, Charlotte Thuiller, Claudine Molly, Louise Tripodi, Aurélie Desbree, Nadine Annino, Paul Verhoeven, Anne Carricajo, Thomas Bourlet, Céline Chapelle, Isabelle Claudet, Arnauld Garcin, Jacques Izopet, Olivier Mory, Bruno Pozzetto","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is typically uncertain during initial treatment, leading to systematic empiric antibiotic use. This study investigates if having rapid multiplex PCR results in the emergency department (ED) improves empiric treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OPTIPAC, a French multicentre study (2016-2018), enrolled patients consulting for CAP at the paediatric ED in 11 centres. Patients were randomized to either receive a multiplex PCR test plus usual care or usual care alone and followed for 15 days. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of initial antimicrobial management, determined by a blinded committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 499 randomized patients, 248 were tested with the multiplex PCR. Appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment was higher in the PCR group (168/245, 68.6% vs. 120/249, 48.2%; Relative risk 1.42 [1.22-1.66]; p < 0.0001), chiefly by reducing unnecessary antibiotics in viral pneumonia (RR 3.29 [2.20-4.90]). No adverse events were identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The multiplex PCR assay result at the ED improves paediatric CAP's antimicrobial stewardship, by both reducing antibiotic prescriptions and enhancing treatment appropriateness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of respiratory pathogens detection by a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay on the management of community-acquired pneumonia for children at the paediatric emergency department. A randomized controlled trial, the Optimization of Pneumonia Acute Care (OPTIPAC) study.\",\"authors\":\"Aymeric Cantais, Sylvie Pillet, Josselin Rigaill, François Angoulvant, Christele Gras-Le-Guen, Pierrick Cros, Charlotte Thuiller, Claudine Molly, Louise Tripodi, Aurélie Desbree, Nadine Annino, Paul Verhoeven, Anne Carricajo, Thomas Bourlet, Céline Chapelle, Isabelle Claudet, Arnauld Garcin, Jacques Izopet, Olivier Mory, Bruno Pozzetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is typically uncertain during initial treatment, leading to systematic empiric antibiotic use. This study investigates if having rapid multiplex PCR results in the emergency department (ED) improves empiric treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OPTIPAC, a French multicentre study (2016-2018), enrolled patients consulting for CAP at the paediatric ED in 11 centres. Patients were randomized to either receive a multiplex PCR test plus usual care or usual care alone and followed for 15 days. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of initial antimicrobial management, determined by a blinded committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 499 randomized patients, 248 were tested with the multiplex PCR. Appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment was higher in the PCR group (168/245, 68.6% vs. 120/249, 48.2%; Relative risk 1.42 [1.22-1.66]; p < 0.0001), chiefly by reducing unnecessary antibiotics in viral pneumonia (RR 3.29 [2.20-4.90]). No adverse events were identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The multiplex PCR assay result at the ED improves paediatric CAP's antimicrobial stewardship, by both reducing antibiotic prescriptions and enhancing treatment appropriateness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.08.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.08.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的病原体在初始治疗期间通常并不确定,因此需要系统地使用经验性抗生素。本研究探讨了在急诊科(ED)获得快速多重 PCR 结果是否能改善经验性治疗:OPTIPAC是一项法国多中心研究(2016-2018年),共招募了11个中心的儿科急诊室CAP就诊患者。患者被随机分配为接受多重 PCR 检测加常规治疗或仅接受常规治疗,并随访 15 天。主要结果是初始抗菌药物治疗的适当性,由一个盲人委员会决定:结果:在随机抽取的 499 名患者中,有 248 人接受了多重 PCR 检测。PCR 组抗生素治疗的适宜性更高(168/245,68.6% vs 120/249,48.2%;RR 1.42 [1.22-1.66],PC 结论):急诊室的多重 PCR 检测结果可减少抗生素处方并提高治疗的适当性,从而改善儿科 CAP 的抗菌药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of respiratory pathogens detection by a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay on the management of community-acquired pneumonia for children at the paediatric emergency department. A randomized controlled trial, the Optimization of Pneumonia Acute Care (OPTIPAC) study.

Objectives: The pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is typically uncertain during initial treatment, leading to systematic empiric antibiotic use. This study investigates if having rapid multiplex PCR results in the emergency department (ED) improves empiric treatment.

Methods: OPTIPAC, a French multicentre study (2016-2018), enrolled patients consulting for CAP at the paediatric ED in 11 centres. Patients were randomized to either receive a multiplex PCR test plus usual care or usual care alone and followed for 15 days. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of initial antimicrobial management, determined by a blinded committee.

Results: Of the 499 randomized patients, 248 were tested with the multiplex PCR. Appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment was higher in the PCR group (168/245, 68.6% vs. 120/249, 48.2%; Relative risk 1.42 [1.22-1.66]; p < 0.0001), chiefly by reducing unnecessary antibiotics in viral pneumonia (RR 3.29 [2.20-4.90]). No adverse events were identified.

Discussion: The multiplex PCR assay result at the ED improves paediatric CAP's antimicrobial stewardship, by both reducing antibiotic prescriptions and enhancing treatment appropriateness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信