{"title":"区分深叶和浅叶良性腮腺肿瘤的最小筋膜-肿瘤距离:回顾性研究与 Meta 分析。","authors":"Yi-Chan Lee, Yao-Te Tsai, Ming-Shao Tsai, Ti-Yung Tseng, Chih-Chen Chang, Kai-Ping Chang","doi":"10.1111/coa.14207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the minimum fascia-tumour distance (MFTD) in distinguishing deep-lobe benign parotid tumours from superficial-lobe tumours through both an original study and a meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of data from 91 patients who had been diagnosed with benign parotid tumours. The MFTD values were sourced from preoperative ultrasound examinations. The locations of these tumours were confirmed through surgical findings. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of MFTD by utilising receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of the pertinent literature and performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to ascertain the overall diagnostic efficacy of MFTD in identifying benign parotid tumours.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with tumours in the deep lobe had a significantly greater MFTD than patients with tumours in the superficial lobe. Using a cutoff value of 3.50 mm for MFTD, we found an AUC of 0.93, a sensitivity of 81.8%, and a specificity of 98.8%. Our meta-analysis included seven studies covering a total of 1689 tumours. The pooled values for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of MFTD were 81.0%, 89.0%, and 32.2, respectively. The AUC of the summarised ROC curve of MFTD was 0.90.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The MFTD demonstrated reliable diagnostic accuracy in identifying deep-lobe benign parotid tumours and may be incorporated into standard evaluations before parotidectomy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"49 6","pages":"785-792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum Fascia-Tumour Distance for Differentiating Deep Lobe From Superficial Lobe Benign Parotid Tumours: A Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Chan Lee, Yao-Te Tsai, Ming-Shao Tsai, Ti-Yung Tseng, Chih-Chen Chang, Kai-Ping Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the minimum fascia-tumour distance (MFTD) in distinguishing deep-lobe benign parotid tumours from superficial-lobe tumours through both an original study and a meta-analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of data from 91 patients who had been diagnosed with benign parotid tumours. The MFTD values were sourced from preoperative ultrasound examinations. The locations of these tumours were confirmed through surgical findings. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of MFTD by utilising receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of the pertinent literature and performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to ascertain the overall diagnostic efficacy of MFTD in identifying benign parotid tumours.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with tumours in the deep lobe had a significantly greater MFTD than patients with tumours in the superficial lobe. Using a cutoff value of 3.50 mm for MFTD, we found an AUC of 0.93, a sensitivity of 81.8%, and a specificity of 98.8%. Our meta-analysis included seven studies covering a total of 1689 tumours. The pooled values for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of MFTD were 81.0%, 89.0%, and 32.2, respectively. The AUC of the summarised ROC curve of MFTD was 0.90.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The MFTD demonstrated reliable diagnostic accuracy in identifying deep-lobe benign parotid tumours and may be incorporated into standard evaluations before parotidectomy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"49 6\",\"pages\":\"785-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimum Fascia-Tumour Distance for Differentiating Deep Lobe From Superficial Lobe Benign Parotid Tumours: A Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis
Background
This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the minimum fascia-tumour distance (MFTD) in distinguishing deep-lobe benign parotid tumours from superficial-lobe tumours through both an original study and a meta-analysis.
Methods
In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of data from 91 patients who had been diagnosed with benign parotid tumours. The MFTD values were sourced from preoperative ultrasound examinations. The locations of these tumours were confirmed through surgical findings. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of MFTD by utilising receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of the pertinent literature and performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to ascertain the overall diagnostic efficacy of MFTD in identifying benign parotid tumours.
Results
Patients with tumours in the deep lobe had a significantly greater MFTD than patients with tumours in the superficial lobe. Using a cutoff value of 3.50 mm for MFTD, we found an AUC of 0.93, a sensitivity of 81.8%, and a specificity of 98.8%. Our meta-analysis included seven studies covering a total of 1689 tumours. The pooled values for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of MFTD were 81.0%, 89.0%, and 32.2, respectively. The AUC of the summarised ROC curve of MFTD was 0.90.
Conclusion
The MFTD demonstrated reliable diagnostic accuracy in identifying deep-lobe benign parotid tumours and may be incorporated into standard evaluations before parotidectomy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.