梯度提升决策树对肺毁损患者术后肺不张并发症的预测价值。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-07-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/IEQE3348
Zhongming Tang, Jifu Tang, Wei Liu, Guoqiang Chen, Chenggang Feng, Aiping Zhang
{"title":"梯度提升决策树对肺毁损患者术后肺不张并发症的预测价值。","authors":"Zhongming Tang, Jifu Tang, Wei Liu, Guoqiang Chen, Chenggang Feng, Aiping Zhang","doi":"10.62347/IEQE3348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application value of a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) in predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients with destroyed lungs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 170 patients with damaged lungs who underwent surgical treatment in Chest Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2021 to May 2023 were retrospectively selected. The patients were divided into a training set (n = 119) and a validation set (n = 51). Both GBDT algorithm model and Logistic regression model for predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GBDT model indicated that the relative importance scores of the four influencing factors were operation time (51.037), intraoperative blood loss (38.657), presence of lung function (9.126) and sputum obstruction (1.180). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that operation duration and sputum obstruction were significant predictors of postoperative atelectasis among patients with destroyed lungs within the training set (<i>P</i> = 0.048, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for GBDT and Logistic model in the training set was 0.795 and 0.763, and their AUCs in the validation set were 0.776 and 0.811. The GBDT model's predictions closely matched the ideal curve, showing a higher net benefit than the reference line.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBDT model is suitable for predicting the incidence of complications in small samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of gradient boosting decision trees for postoperative atelectasis complications in patients with pulmonary destruction.\",\"authors\":\"Zhongming Tang, Jifu Tang, Wei Liu, Guoqiang Chen, Chenggang Feng, Aiping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/IEQE3348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application value of a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) in predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients with destroyed lungs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 170 patients with damaged lungs who underwent surgical treatment in Chest Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2021 to May 2023 were retrospectively selected. The patients were divided into a training set (n = 119) and a validation set (n = 51). Both GBDT algorithm model and Logistic regression model for predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GBDT model indicated that the relative importance scores of the four influencing factors were operation time (51.037), intraoperative blood loss (38.657), presence of lung function (9.126) and sputum obstruction (1.180). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that operation duration and sputum obstruction were significant predictors of postoperative atelectasis among patients with destroyed lungs within the training set (<i>P</i> = 0.048, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for GBDT and Logistic model in the training set was 0.795 and 0.763, and their AUCs in the validation set were 0.776 and 0.811. The GBDT model's predictions closely matched the ideal curve, showing a higher net benefit than the reference line.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBDT model is suitable for predicting the incidence of complications in small samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/IEQE3348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/IEQE3348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨梯度提升决策树(GBDT)在预测肺损伤患者术后肺不张中的应用价值:回顾性选取 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在广西壮族自治区胸科医院接受手术治疗的 170 例肺损伤患者。将患者分为训练集(n = 119)和验证集(n = 51)。建立了预测患者术后肺不张的 GBDT 算法模型和 Logistic 回归模型。采用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)、校准曲线和决策曲线来评估模型的预测效率:GBDT模型显示,四个影响因素的相对重要性得分分别为手术时间(51.037)、术中失血量(38.657)、肺功能(9.126)和痰液阻塞(1.180)。多变量 Logistic 回归分析显示,手术时间和痰液阻塞是训练集中肺毁损患者术后发生肺不张的重要预测因素(P = 0.048,P = 0.002)。ROC 曲线分析显示,GBDT 模型和 Logistic 模型在训练集中的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.795 和 0.763,在验证集中的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.776 和 0.811。GBDT 模型的预测结果与理想曲线非常吻合,显示出比参考线更高的净效益:GBDT模型适用于预测小样本并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive value of gradient boosting decision trees for postoperative atelectasis complications in patients with pulmonary destruction.

Objective: To explore the application value of a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) in predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients with destroyed lungs.

Methods: A total of 170 patients with damaged lungs who underwent surgical treatment in Chest Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2021 to May 2023 were retrospectively selected. The patients were divided into a training set (n = 119) and a validation set (n = 51). Both GBDT algorithm model and Logistic regression model for predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of the model.

Results: The GBDT model indicated that the relative importance scores of the four influencing factors were operation time (51.037), intraoperative blood loss (38.657), presence of lung function (9.126) and sputum obstruction (1.180). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that operation duration and sputum obstruction were significant predictors of postoperative atelectasis among patients with destroyed lungs within the training set (P = 0.048, P = 0.002). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for GBDT and Logistic model in the training set was 0.795 and 0.763, and their AUCs in the validation set were 0.776 and 0.811. The GBDT model's predictions closely matched the ideal curve, showing a higher net benefit than the reference line.

Conclusions: GBDT model is suitable for predicting the incidence of complications in small samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信