基础科学教育对医学学习者职业认同发展的贡献:批判性范围审查》。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005833
Janet E Lindsley, Emine E Abali, Elliot A Asare, Candace J Chow, Caden Cluff, Marisol Hernandez, Susan Jamieson, Amit Kaushal, Nicole N Woods
{"title":"基础科学教育对医学学习者职业认同发展的贡献:批判性范围审查》。","authors":"Janet E Lindsley, Emine E Abali, Elliot A Asare, Candace J Chow, Caden Cluff, Marisol Hernandez, Susan Jamieson, Amit Kaushal, Nicole N Woods","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Professional identity development (PID) has become an important focus of medical education. To date, contributions of basic science education to physician PID have not been broadly explored. This review explores the literature surrounding the contribution of basic science education to the PID of medical learners and interprets findings critically in terms of the landscapes of practice (LoP) framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this critical scoping review, the authors searched 12 different databases and professional organization websites from January 1988 to October 2022 for references relating to how, if at all, the basic science component of medical education contributes to the PID of medical learners. The LoP learning theory was chosen as a framework for critically interpreting the identified articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6,674 identified references, 257 met the inclusion criteria. After data extraction, content analysis of recorded key findings was used to ensure all findings were incorporated into the synthesis. Findings aligned with and were critically interpreted in relation to the 3 LoP modes of identification: engagement (engaging in the work of a physician), imagination (imagining oneself becoming a \"good doctor\"), and alignment (aligning with the practices and expectations of a medical community or specialty). Within each mode of identification, it was possible to see how basic science may support, or catalyze, PID and how basic science may serve as a barrier, or an inhibitor, to PID or contribute to the development of negative aspects of identity development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LoP learning theory suggests that the effect of basic science on physicians' PID is most effective if educators view themselves as guides through interfaces between their scientific disciplines and medicine. Learners need opportunities to be engaged, to imagine how their current learning activities and developing skills will be useful as future physicians, and to feel alignment with medical specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1191-1198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution of Basic Science Education to the Professional Identity Development of Medical Learners: A Critical Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Janet E Lindsley, Emine E Abali, Elliot A Asare, Candace J Chow, Caden Cluff, Marisol Hernandez, Susan Jamieson, Amit Kaushal, Nicole N Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Professional identity development (PID) has become an important focus of medical education. To date, contributions of basic science education to physician PID have not been broadly explored. This review explores the literature surrounding the contribution of basic science education to the PID of medical learners and interprets findings critically in terms of the landscapes of practice (LoP) framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this critical scoping review, the authors searched 12 different databases and professional organization websites from January 1988 to October 2022 for references relating to how, if at all, the basic science component of medical education contributes to the PID of medical learners. The LoP learning theory was chosen as a framework for critically interpreting the identified articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6,674 identified references, 257 met the inclusion criteria. After data extraction, content analysis of recorded key findings was used to ensure all findings were incorporated into the synthesis. Findings aligned with and were critically interpreted in relation to the 3 LoP modes of identification: engagement (engaging in the work of a physician), imagination (imagining oneself becoming a \\\"good doctor\\\"), and alignment (aligning with the practices and expectations of a medical community or specialty). Within each mode of identification, it was possible to see how basic science may support, or catalyze, PID and how basic science may serve as a barrier, or an inhibitor, to PID or contribute to the development of negative aspects of identity development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LoP learning theory suggests that the effect of basic science on physicians' PID is most effective if educators view themselves as guides through interfaces between their scientific disciplines and medicine. Learners need opportunities to be engaged, to imagine how their current learning activities and developing skills will be useful as future physicians, and to feel alignment with medical specialties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1191-1198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005833\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:职业认同发展(PID)已成为医学教育的一个重要焦点。迄今为止,基础科学教育对医生 PID 的贡献尚未得到广泛探讨。本综述探讨了有关基础科学教育对医学学习者职业认同发展的贡献的文献,并从实践景观(LoP)框架的角度对研究结果进行了批判性解读:在这一批判性的范围界定综述中,作者搜索了1988年1月至2022年10月的12个不同的数据库和专业组织网站,以查找与医学教育中的基础科学部分如何(如果有的话)促进医学学习者的PID相关的参考文献。作者选择了LoP学习理论作为批判性解读所发现文章的框架:在 6674 篇已确定的参考文献中,257 篇符合纳入标准。数据提取后,对记录的主要研究结果进行了内容分析,以确保将所有研究结果纳入综述。研究结果与 3 种 LoP 识别模式相一致,并对其进行了批判性解读:参与(参与医生的工作)、想象(想象自己成为一名 "好医生")和一致(与医学界或专业的实践和期望相一致)。在每一种认同模式中,我们都可以看到基础科学如何支持或促进 PID,以及基础科学如何成为 PID 的障碍或抑制因素,或助长认同发展的消极方面:LoP学习理论认为,如果教育者将自己视为科学学科与医学界面的引导者,那么基础科学对医生PID的影响将最为有效。学习者需要有机会参与其中,想象他们当前的学习活动和发展的技能将如何对未来的医生有用,并感受到与医学专业的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contribution of Basic Science Education to the Professional Identity Development of Medical Learners: A Critical Scoping Review.

Purpose: Professional identity development (PID) has become an important focus of medical education. To date, contributions of basic science education to physician PID have not been broadly explored. This review explores the literature surrounding the contribution of basic science education to the PID of medical learners and interprets findings critically in terms of the landscapes of practice (LoP) framework.

Method: In this critical scoping review, the authors searched 12 different databases and professional organization websites from January 1988 to October 2022 for references relating to how, if at all, the basic science component of medical education contributes to the PID of medical learners. The LoP learning theory was chosen as a framework for critically interpreting the identified articles.

Results: Of the 6,674 identified references, 257 met the inclusion criteria. After data extraction, content analysis of recorded key findings was used to ensure all findings were incorporated into the synthesis. Findings aligned with and were critically interpreted in relation to the 3 LoP modes of identification: engagement (engaging in the work of a physician), imagination (imagining oneself becoming a "good doctor"), and alignment (aligning with the practices and expectations of a medical community or specialty). Within each mode of identification, it was possible to see how basic science may support, or catalyze, PID and how basic science may serve as a barrier, or an inhibitor, to PID or contribute to the development of negative aspects of identity development.

Conclusions: The LoP learning theory suggests that the effect of basic science on physicians' PID is most effective if educators view themselves as guides through interfaces between their scientific disciplines and medicine. Learners need opportunities to be engaged, to imagine how their current learning activities and developing skills will be useful as future physicians, and to feel alignment with medical specialties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信