Mar Estupiñán Fdez. de Mesa, Afrodita Marcu, Emma Ream, Katriina L. Whitaker
{"title":"英格兰乳腺癌妇女在接受治疗时遭遇的社会经济不平等:交叉横断面研究。","authors":"Mar Estupiñán Fdez. de Mesa, Afrodita Marcu, Emma Ream, Katriina L. Whitaker","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Guided by the Intersectionality Framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Secondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys. We used disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with social position. We then used logistic regression to investigate the odds (Odds Ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals) of reporting positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and Trust level factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Poorer care experience was predominantly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Statistically significant findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Compared to patients aged 65–74 years, younger respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (16–34 years old OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.55 (0.36–0.84). Compared to White British, Asian (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.51 (0.39–0.66)) and Black African women (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.53 (0.33–0.88)) were less likely to rate their care favourably. The least affluent respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.79 (0.64–0.97)).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalisation to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 102648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467/pdfft?md5=bca2f271b0a07c7820ef8017681e1cc2&pid=1-s2.0-S1462388924001467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic inequities in care experienced by women with breast cancer in England: An intersectional cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Mar Estupiñán Fdez. de Mesa, Afrodita Marcu, Emma Ream, Katriina L. Whitaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Guided by the Intersectionality Framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Secondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys. We used disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with social position. We then used logistic regression to investigate the odds (Odds Ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals) of reporting positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and Trust level factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Poorer care experience was predominantly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Statistically significant findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Compared to patients aged 65–74 years, younger respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (16–34 years old OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.55 (0.36–0.84). Compared to White British, Asian (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.51 (0.39–0.66)) and Black African women (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.53 (0.33–0.88)) were less likely to rate their care favourably. The least affluent respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.79 (0.64–0.97)).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalisation to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467/pdfft?md5=bca2f271b0a07c7820ef8017681e1cc2&pid=1-s2.0-S1462388924001467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socioeconomic inequities in care experienced by women with breast cancer in England: An intersectional cross-sectional study
Purpose
Guided by the Intersectionality Framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England.
Methods
Secondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys. We used disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with social position. We then used logistic regression to investigate the odds (Odds Ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals) of reporting positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and Trust level factors.
Results
Poorer care experience was predominantly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Statistically significant findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Compared to patients aged 65–74 years, younger respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (16–34 years old ORadj. = 0.55 (0.36–0.84). Compared to White British, Asian (ORadj. = 0.51 (0.39–0.66)) and Black African women (ORadj. = 0.53 (0.33–0.88)) were less likely to rate their care favourably. The least affluent respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (ORadj. = 0.79 (0.64–0.97)).
Conclusion
There is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalisation to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society.
The journal publishes the following types of papers:
• Original research articles
• Review articles