英格兰乳腺癌妇女在接受治疗时遭遇的社会经济不平等:交叉横断面研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"英格兰乳腺癌妇女在接受治疗时遭遇的社会经济不平等:交叉横断面研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Guided by the Intersectionality Framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Secondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys. We used disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with social position. We then used logistic regression to investigate the odds (Odds Ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals) of reporting positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and Trust level factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Poorer care experience was predominantly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Statistically significant findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Compared to patients aged 65–74 years, younger respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (16–34 years old OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.55 (0.36–0.84). Compared to White British, Asian (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.51 (0.39–0.66)) and Black African women (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.53 (0.33–0.88)) were less likely to rate their care favourably. The least affluent respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.79 (0.64–0.97)).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalisation to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467/pdfft?md5=bca2f271b0a07c7820ef8017681e1cc2&pid=1-s2.0-S1462388924001467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic inequities in care experienced by women with breast cancer in England: An intersectional cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Guided by the Intersectionality Framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Secondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys. We used disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with social position. We then used logistic regression to investigate the odds (Odds Ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals) of reporting positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and Trust level factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Poorer care experience was predominantly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Statistically significant findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Compared to patients aged 65–74 years, younger respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (16–34 years old OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.55 (0.36–0.84). Compared to White British, Asian (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.51 (0.39–0.66)) and Black African women (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.53 (0.33–0.88)) were less likely to rate their care favourably. The least affluent respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (OR<sub>adj.</sub> = 0.79 (0.64–0.97)).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalisation to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467/pdfft?md5=bca2f271b0a07c7820ef8017681e1cc2&pid=1-s2.0-S1462388924001467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在交叉性框架的指导下,我们研究了英格兰不同人口亚群在乳腺癌护理体验方面的差异:利用 2017/2018 年全国癌症患者体验调查进行二次数据分析。我们使用分类描述性统计(平均值、标准误差、95% 置信区间)分析了 26,030 份女性乳腺癌患者对有关整体护理体验问题的回答,这些回答按年龄、种族和性取向与社会地位的交叉关系进行了分类。然后,我们使用逻辑回归法研究了报告积极护理体验的几率(OR,95% 置信区间),并对患者、临床和信托层面的因素进行了调整:报告护理体验较差的主要是最贫困的年轻人和少数民族群体。在调整后的多变量分析中观察到了具有统计学意义的结果。与 65-74 岁的患者相比,较年轻的受访者不太可能对其护理服务给予好评(16-34 岁 ORadj.与英国白人女性相比,亚裔女性(ORadj. = 0.51 (0.39-0.66))和黑非洲女性(ORadj. = 0.53 (0.33-0.88))更不可能对她们的护理给予好评。结论:有证据表明,英格兰女性乳腺癌患者的总体癌症护理体验不公平,尤其是在年龄、种族和社会经济地位处于特定交叉点的女性患者中。未来有必要开展研究,以了解乳腺癌不平等现象的内在机制。政策制定者、专员和医疗服务提供者应考虑存在多种形式的边缘化,以便为针对高危患者的改进措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioeconomic inequities in care experienced by women with breast cancer in England: An intersectional cross-sectional study

Purpose

Guided by the Intersectionality Framework, we examined the differential in breast cancer care experience across population subgroups in England.

Methods

Secondary data analysis using the 2017/2018 National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys. We used disaggregated descriptive statistics (mean, standard errors, 95% confidence interval) to analyse 26,030 responses from female breast cancer patients to a question relating to overall care experience categorised by age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in their intersection with social position. We then used logistic regression to investigate the odds (Odds Ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals) of reporting positive care experience adjusting for patient, clinical, and Trust level factors.

Results

Poorer care experience was predominantly reported by the most deprived younger and minoritised ethnic groups. Statistically significant findings were observed in adjusted multivariable analyses. Compared to patients aged 65–74 years, younger respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (16–34 years old ORadj. = 0.55 (0.36–0.84). Compared to White British, Asian (ORadj. = 0.51 (0.39–0.66)) and Black African women (ORadj. = 0.53 (0.33–0.88)) were less likely to rate their care favourably. The least affluent respondents were less likely to rate their care favourably (ORadj. = 0.79 (0.64–0.97)).

Conclusion

There is evidence of inequity in overall cancer care experience among female breast cancer patients in England, particularly among women living at the specific intersection of age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. Future research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying breast cancer inequities. Policymakers, commissioners, and providers should consider the existence of multiple forms of marginalisation to inform improvement initiatives targeting patients at higher risk of vulnerability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信