Amanda Seaberg, Waheed Awotoye, Fang Qian, Ligiane A Machado-Paula, Lindsey Dunlay, Azeez Butali, Jeff Murray, Lina Moreno-Uribe, Aline L Petrin
{"title":"DNA 甲基化对范德武德综合征表型变异的影响","authors":"Amanda Seaberg, Waheed Awotoye, Fang Qian, Ligiane A Machado-Paula, Lindsey Dunlay, Azeez Butali, Jeff Murray, Lina Moreno-Uribe, Aline L Petrin","doi":"10.1177/10556656241269495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveVan der Woude Syndrome (VWS) presents with combinations of lip pits (LP) and cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P, CPO). VWS phenotypic heterogeneity even amongst relatives, suggests that epigenetic factors may act as modifiers. <i>IRF6,</i> causal for 70% of VWS cases, and <i>TP63</i> interact in a regulatory loop coordinating epithelial proliferation and differentiation in palatogenesis. We hypothesize that differential DNA methylation within <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> regulatory regions underlie VWS phenotypic discordance.MethodsDNA methylation of CpG sites in <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> promoters and in an <i>IRF6</i> enhancer element was compared amongst blood or saliva DNA samples of 78 unrelated cases. Analyses were done separately for blood and saliva, within each sex and in combination, and to address cleft type (CL/P ± LP vs. CPO ± LP) and phenotypic severity (any cleft + LP vs. any cleft only).ResultsFor cleft type, blood samples showed higher <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> promoter methylation on males with CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP and on individuals with CPO ± LP compared to those with CL/P ± LP, respectively. Saliva samples showed higher <i>IRF6</i> enhancer methylation on individuals with CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP and contrary to above, lower <i>TP63</i> promoter methylation on CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP. For phenotypic severity, blood samples showed no differences; however, saliva samples showed higher <i>IRF6</i> promoter methylation in individuals with any cleft + LP compared to those without lip pits.ConclusionWe observed differential methylation in <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> regulatory regions associated with cleft type and phenotypic severity, indicating that epigenetic changes in <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> can contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity in VWS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1641-1650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DNA Methylation Effects on Van der Woude Syndrome Phenotypic Variability.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Seaberg, Waheed Awotoye, Fang Qian, Ligiane A Machado-Paula, Lindsey Dunlay, Azeez Butali, Jeff Murray, Lina Moreno-Uribe, Aline L Petrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241269495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveVan der Woude Syndrome (VWS) presents with combinations of lip pits (LP) and cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P, CPO). VWS phenotypic heterogeneity even amongst relatives, suggests that epigenetic factors may act as modifiers. <i>IRF6,</i> causal for 70% of VWS cases, and <i>TP63</i> interact in a regulatory loop coordinating epithelial proliferation and differentiation in palatogenesis. We hypothesize that differential DNA methylation within <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> regulatory regions underlie VWS phenotypic discordance.MethodsDNA methylation of CpG sites in <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> promoters and in an <i>IRF6</i> enhancer element was compared amongst blood or saliva DNA samples of 78 unrelated cases. Analyses were done separately for blood and saliva, within each sex and in combination, and to address cleft type (CL/P ± LP vs. CPO ± LP) and phenotypic severity (any cleft + LP vs. any cleft only).ResultsFor cleft type, blood samples showed higher <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> promoter methylation on males with CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP and on individuals with CPO ± LP compared to those with CL/P ± LP, respectively. Saliva samples showed higher <i>IRF6</i> enhancer methylation on individuals with CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP and contrary to above, lower <i>TP63</i> promoter methylation on CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP. For phenotypic severity, blood samples showed no differences; however, saliva samples showed higher <i>IRF6</i> promoter methylation in individuals with any cleft + LP compared to those without lip pits.ConclusionWe observed differential methylation in <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> regulatory regions associated with cleft type and phenotypic severity, indicating that epigenetic changes in <i>IRF6</i> and <i>TP63</i> can contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity in VWS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1641-1650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241269495\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241269495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
DNA Methylation Effects on Van der Woude Syndrome Phenotypic Variability.
ObjectiveVan der Woude Syndrome (VWS) presents with combinations of lip pits (LP) and cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P, CPO). VWS phenotypic heterogeneity even amongst relatives, suggests that epigenetic factors may act as modifiers. IRF6, causal for 70% of VWS cases, and TP63 interact in a regulatory loop coordinating epithelial proliferation and differentiation in palatogenesis. We hypothesize that differential DNA methylation within IRF6 and TP63 regulatory regions underlie VWS phenotypic discordance.MethodsDNA methylation of CpG sites in IRF6 and TP63 promoters and in an IRF6 enhancer element was compared amongst blood or saliva DNA samples of 78 unrelated cases. Analyses were done separately for blood and saliva, within each sex and in combination, and to address cleft type (CL/P ± LP vs. CPO ± LP) and phenotypic severity (any cleft + LP vs. any cleft only).ResultsFor cleft type, blood samples showed higher IRF6 and TP63 promoter methylation on males with CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP and on individuals with CPO ± LP compared to those with CL/P ± LP, respectively. Saliva samples showed higher IRF6 enhancer methylation on individuals with CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP and contrary to above, lower TP63 promoter methylation on CPO ± LP compared to CL/P ± LP. For phenotypic severity, blood samples showed no differences; however, saliva samples showed higher IRF6 promoter methylation in individuals with any cleft + LP compared to those without lip pits.ConclusionWe observed differential methylation in IRF6 and TP63 regulatory regions associated with cleft type and phenotypic severity, indicating that epigenetic changes in IRF6 and TP63 can contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity in VWS.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.