管理和参与的负担与益处:对高层管理人员和工作委员会成员进行以人为本的风险评估的日记研究方法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Ciel A Neuhaus, Yannick A Metzler, Yacine Taibi, Andreas Müller, Silja Bellingrath
{"title":"管理和参与的负担与益处:对高层管理人员和工作委员会成员进行以人为本的风险评估的日记研究方法。","authors":"Ciel A Neuhaus, Yannick A Metzler, Yacine Taibi, Andreas Müller, Silja Bellingrath","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2383058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present diary study investigates the impact of daily effort-reward imbalance (ERI), subjective stress and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) as an objective measure on work engagement of top managers and high-level works council members (<i>N</i> = 45) on three consecutive working days. In the scope of psychosocial risk assessment, we argue that focusing on ERI as a generalized work characteristic might be more suitable for work re-design of higher leadership positions because of their highly dynamic and unpredictable psychosocial work characteristics, while at the same time having more access to job resources. The analyses reveal that both baseline and daily ERI, as well as subjective stress, influence work engagement. Our results suggest that interventions to reduce daily levels of ERI may improve the work environment of top managers and works councils by promoting work engagement and related positive health outcomes in the scope of person-centred risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The burdens and benefits of managing and engaging: a diary study approach to person-centred risk assessment of top executives and works council members.\",\"authors\":\"Ciel A Neuhaus, Yannick A Metzler, Yacine Taibi, Andreas Müller, Silja Bellingrath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10803548.2024.2383058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present diary study investigates the impact of daily effort-reward imbalance (ERI), subjective stress and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) as an objective measure on work engagement of top managers and high-level works council members (<i>N</i> = 45) on three consecutive working days. In the scope of psychosocial risk assessment, we argue that focusing on ERI as a generalized work characteristic might be more suitable for work re-design of higher leadership positions because of their highly dynamic and unpredictable psychosocial work characteristics, while at the same time having more access to job resources. The analyses reveal that both baseline and daily ERI, as well as subjective stress, influence work engagement. Our results suggest that interventions to reduce daily levels of ERI may improve the work environment of top managers and works councils by promoting work engagement and related positive health outcomes in the scope of person-centred risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2383058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2383058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本日记研究调查了高层管理人员和高级工作委员会成员(45 人)在连续三个工作日内的日常努力-回报不平衡(ERI)、主观压力和皮质醇唤醒反应(CAR)作为客观测量指标对工作投入度的影响。在社会心理风险评估的范围内,我们认为,将 ERI 作为一种通用的工作特征,可能更适合对高层领导职位的工作进行重新设计,因为他们的社会心理工作特征具有高度的动态性和不可预测性,同时还能获得更多的工作资源。分析表明,基线和每日 ERI 以及主观压力都会影响工作投入度。我们的研究结果表明,在以人为本的风险评估范围内,降低日常 ERI 水平的干预措施可以通过促进工作投入和相关的积极健康结果,改善高层管理人员和劳资协议会的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The burdens and benefits of managing and engaging: a diary study approach to person-centred risk assessment of top executives and works council members.

The present diary study investigates the impact of daily effort-reward imbalance (ERI), subjective stress and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) as an objective measure on work engagement of top managers and high-level works council members (N = 45) on three consecutive working days. In the scope of psychosocial risk assessment, we argue that focusing on ERI as a generalized work characteristic might be more suitable for work re-design of higher leadership positions because of their highly dynamic and unpredictable psychosocial work characteristics, while at the same time having more access to job resources. The analyses reveal that both baseline and daily ERI, as well as subjective stress, influence work engagement. Our results suggest that interventions to reduce daily levels of ERI may improve the work environment of top managers and works councils by promoting work engagement and related positive health outcomes in the scope of person-centred risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信