马里兰州全球预算收入模式下的患者住院治疗体验:差异分析

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308331
Ronnie L Shammas, Jenna Li, Evan Matros, Oluseyi Aliu
{"title":"马里兰州全球预算收入模式下的患者住院治疗体验:差异分析","authors":"Ronnie L Shammas, Jenna Li, Evan Matros, Oluseyi Aliu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0308331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As a result of the success of Maryland's full risk capitated payment model experiment (Global Budget Revenue) in constraining healthcare costs, there is momentum for expanding the reach of such models. However, as these models are implemented, studies analyzing their long-term effects suggest unintended spillover effects that may ultimately influence patient experiences. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementation of the GBR was associated with changes in patient experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study using a difference-in-difference analysis to examine changes in patient experiences according to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) domains before and after implementation of the GBR model. Acute care hospitals from 2010-2016 with completed HCAHPS surveys were included. Hospitals identified for inclusion were then matched, based on county location, to area level characteristics using the Area Health Resource File.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 844 hospitals were included. Compared to hospitals in non-GBR states, hospitals in GBR states experienced significant declines in the following HCAHPS domains: \"would definitely recommend the hospital to others\" [Average treatment effect (ATT) = -1.19, 95% CI = -1.97, -0.41)] and 9-10 rating of the hospital (ATT = -0.93, 95% CI = -1.71, -0.15). Results also showed significant increases in the HCAHPS domains: \"if patient's rooms and bathroom were always kept clean\" (ATT = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.20, 2.00). There were no significant differences in changes for the other domains, including no improvements in: nursing communication, doctor communication, help from hospital staff, pain control, communication on medicines, discharge information, and quietness of the patient environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest there should be efforts made to ascertain and mitigate potential adverse effects of care transformation initiatives on patient experience. Patients are stakeholders and their inputs should be sought and incorporated in care transformation efforts to ensure that these models align with improved patient experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 8","pages":"e0308331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ronnie L Shammas, Jenna Li, Evan Matros, Oluseyi Aliu\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0308331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As a result of the success of Maryland's full risk capitated payment model experiment (Global Budget Revenue) in constraining healthcare costs, there is momentum for expanding the reach of such models. However, as these models are implemented, studies analyzing their long-term effects suggest unintended spillover effects that may ultimately influence patient experiences. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementation of the GBR was associated with changes in patient experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study using a difference-in-difference analysis to examine changes in patient experiences according to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) domains before and after implementation of the GBR model. Acute care hospitals from 2010-2016 with completed HCAHPS surveys were included. Hospitals identified for inclusion were then matched, based on county location, to area level characteristics using the Area Health Resource File.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 844 hospitals were included. Compared to hospitals in non-GBR states, hospitals in GBR states experienced significant declines in the following HCAHPS domains: \\\"would definitely recommend the hospital to others\\\" [Average treatment effect (ATT) = -1.19, 95% CI = -1.97, -0.41)] and 9-10 rating of the hospital (ATT = -0.93, 95% CI = -1.71, -0.15). Results also showed significant increases in the HCAHPS domains: \\\"if patient's rooms and bathroom were always kept clean\\\" (ATT = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.20, 2.00). There were no significant differences in changes for the other domains, including no improvements in: nursing communication, doctor communication, help from hospital staff, pain control, communication on medicines, discharge information, and quietness of the patient environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest there should be efforts made to ascertain and mitigate potential adverse effects of care transformation initiatives on patient experience. Patients are stakeholders and their inputs should be sought and incorporated in care transformation efforts to ensure that these models align with improved patient experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 8\",\"pages\":\"e0308331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于马里兰州的全风险按人头付费模式试验(全球预算收入)在限制医疗成本方面取得了成功,因此,扩大此类模式的覆盖范围的势头很猛。然而,随着这些模式的实施,对其长期影响的分析研究表明,意外的溢出效应可能会最终影响患者的就医体验。本研究旨在确定 GBR 的实施是否与患者体验的变化有关:横断面研究采用差异分析法,根据《医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估》(HCAHPS)领域,考察实施 GBR 模式前后患者体验的变化。研究纳入了 2010-2016 年间完成 HCAHPS 调查的急症医院。然后,根据县的位置,使用地区卫生资源档案将确定纳入的医院与地区级特征进行匹配:结果:共纳入了 844 家医院。与非 GBR 州的医院相比,GBR 州的医院在以下 HCAHPS 领域出现了显著下降:"肯定会向他人推荐该医院"[平均治疗效果 (ATT) = -1.19, 95% CI = -1.97, -0.41)]和对医院的 9-10 级评分 (ATT = -0.93, 95% CI = -1.71, -0.15)。结果还显示,HCAHPS 领域的评分有了明显提高:"如果病人的房间和浴室始终保持干净"(ATT = 1.10,95% CI = 0.20,2.00)。其他方面的变化没有明显差异,包括:护理沟通、医生沟通、医院员工的帮助、疼痛控制、药物沟通、出院信息和病人环境的安静程度:这些研究结果表明,应努力确定并减轻护理转型措施对患者体验的潜在不利影响。患者是利益相关者,应在护理转型工作中征求并采纳他们的意见,以确保这些模式与改善患者体验相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis.

Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis.

Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis.

Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis.

Introduction: As a result of the success of Maryland's full risk capitated payment model experiment (Global Budget Revenue) in constraining healthcare costs, there is momentum for expanding the reach of such models. However, as these models are implemented, studies analyzing their long-term effects suggest unintended spillover effects that may ultimately influence patient experiences. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementation of the GBR was associated with changes in patient experience.

Methods: Cross-sectional study using a difference-in-difference analysis to examine changes in patient experiences according to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) domains before and after implementation of the GBR model. Acute care hospitals from 2010-2016 with completed HCAHPS surveys were included. Hospitals identified for inclusion were then matched, based on county location, to area level characteristics using the Area Health Resource File.

Results: A total of 844 hospitals were included. Compared to hospitals in non-GBR states, hospitals in GBR states experienced significant declines in the following HCAHPS domains: "would definitely recommend the hospital to others" [Average treatment effect (ATT) = -1.19, 95% CI = -1.97, -0.41)] and 9-10 rating of the hospital (ATT = -0.93, 95% CI = -1.71, -0.15). Results also showed significant increases in the HCAHPS domains: "if patient's rooms and bathroom were always kept clean" (ATT = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.20, 2.00). There were no significant differences in changes for the other domains, including no improvements in: nursing communication, doctor communication, help from hospital staff, pain control, communication on medicines, discharge information, and quietness of the patient environment.

Conclusion: These findings suggest there should be efforts made to ascertain and mitigate potential adverse effects of care transformation initiatives on patient experience. Patients are stakeholders and their inputs should be sought and incorporated in care transformation efforts to ensure that these models align with improved patient experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信