使用重组 UGTs 预测葡萄糖醛酸化介导的药物清除率时相对活性与相对表达因子(RAF 与 REF)的比较。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s11095-024-03750-x
Sandhya Subash, Deepak Ahire, Mitesh Patel, Sahil Shaikh, Dilip Kumar Singh, Sujal Deshmukh, Bhagwat Prasad
{"title":"使用重组 UGTs 预测葡萄糖醛酸化介导的药物清除率时相对活性与相对表达因子(RAF 与 REF)的比较。","authors":"Sandhya Subash, Deepak Ahire, Mitesh Patel, Sahil Shaikh, Dilip Kumar Singh, Sujal Deshmukh, Bhagwat Prasad","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03750-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Predicting the quantitative fraction of glucuronidation (f<sub>gluc</sub>) by individual UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes (UGTs) is challenging due to the lack of selective inhibitors and inconsistent activity of recombinant UGT systems (rUGTs). Our study compares the relative expression versus activity factors (REF versus RAF) to predict f<sub>gluc</sub> based on rUGT data to human liver and intestinal microsomes (HLM and HIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REF scalars were derived from a previous in-house proteomics study for eleven UGT enzymes (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17), whereas RAF was calculated by measuring activities in rUGTs to microsomes of selective UGT probe substrates. Protein-normalized activity factor (pnAF) values were generated after correcting activity of individual UGTs to their corresponding protein abundance. The utility of REF and RAF in predicting f<sub>gluc</sub> was assessed for three UGT substrates-diclofenac, vorinostat, and raltegravir.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The REF values ranged from 0.02 to 1.75, RAF based on activity obtained in rUGTs to HLM/HIM were from 0.1 to 274. pnAF values were ~ 5 to 80-fold, except for UGT2B4 and UGT2B15, where pnAF was ~ 180 and > 1000, respectively. The results revealed confounding effect of differential specific activities (per pmol) of rUGTs in f<sub>gluc</sub> prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data suggest that the activity of UGT enzymes was significantly lower when compared to their activity in microsomes at the same absolute protein amount (pmol). Collectively, results of this study demonstrate poor and variable specific activity of different rUGTs (per pmol protein), as determined by pnAF values, which should be considered in f<sub>gluc</sub> scaling.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1621-1630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Relative Activity versus Relative Expression Factors (RAF versus REF) in Predicting Glucuronidation Mediated Drug Clearance Using Recombinant UGTs.\",\"authors\":\"Sandhya Subash, Deepak Ahire, Mitesh Patel, Sahil Shaikh, Dilip Kumar Singh, Sujal Deshmukh, Bhagwat Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11095-024-03750-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Predicting the quantitative fraction of glucuronidation (f<sub>gluc</sub>) by individual UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes (UGTs) is challenging due to the lack of selective inhibitors and inconsistent activity of recombinant UGT systems (rUGTs). Our study compares the relative expression versus activity factors (REF versus RAF) to predict f<sub>gluc</sub> based on rUGT data to human liver and intestinal microsomes (HLM and HIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REF scalars were derived from a previous in-house proteomics study for eleven UGT enzymes (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17), whereas RAF was calculated by measuring activities in rUGTs to microsomes of selective UGT probe substrates. Protein-normalized activity factor (pnAF) values were generated after correcting activity of individual UGTs to their corresponding protein abundance. The utility of REF and RAF in predicting f<sub>gluc</sub> was assessed for three UGT substrates-diclofenac, vorinostat, and raltegravir.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The REF values ranged from 0.02 to 1.75, RAF based on activity obtained in rUGTs to HLM/HIM were from 0.1 to 274. pnAF values were ~ 5 to 80-fold, except for UGT2B4 and UGT2B15, where pnAF was ~ 180 and > 1000, respectively. The results revealed confounding effect of differential specific activities (per pmol) of rUGTs in f<sub>gluc</sub> prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data suggest that the activity of UGT enzymes was significantly lower when compared to their activity in microsomes at the same absolute protein amount (pmol). Collectively, results of this study demonstrate poor and variable specific activity of different rUGTs (per pmol protein), as determined by pnAF values, which should be considered in f<sub>gluc</sub> scaling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1621-1630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03750-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03750-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于缺乏选择性抑制剂和重组 UGT 系统(rUGT)的活性不一致,预测单个 UDP-葡萄糖醛酸转移酶(UGT)的葡萄糖醛酸化定量部分(fgluc)具有挑战性。我们的研究根据人类肝脏和肠道微粒体(HLM 和 HIM)的 rUGT 数据,比较了预测 fgluc 的相对表达与活性因子(REF 与 RAF):REF标度来自于之前对11种UGT酶(UGT1A1、UGT1A3、UGT1A4、UGT1A6、UGT1A9、UGT1A10、UGT2B4、UGT2B7、UGT2B10、UGT2B15和UGT2B17)进行的内部蛋白质组学研究,而RAF则是通过测量rUGT对选择性UGT探针底物的微粒体的活性计算得出的。蛋白质归一化活性因子(pnAF)值是将单个 UGT 的活性与其相应的蛋白质丰度进行校正后得出的。针对三种 UGT 底物--双氯芬酸、伏立诺他和雷替格韦,评估了 REF 和 RAF 在预测 fgluc 方面的实用性:除 UGT2B4 和 UGT2B15 的 pnAF 分别为 180 和 1000 倍以外,其他 UGT 底物的 pnAF 值在 5 至 80 倍之间。结果表明,在预测 fgluc 的过程中,rUGTs 不同的特异性活性(每 pmol)会产生混淆效应:数据表明,在蛋白质绝对量(pmol)相同的情况下,UGT 酶的活性明显低于其在微粒体中的活性。总之,这项研究的结果表明,由 pnAF 值确定的不同 rUGT(每 pmol 蛋白)的特异性活性较低且不尽相同,这一点应在 fgluc 预测中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Relative Activity versus Relative Expression Factors (RAF versus REF) in Predicting Glucuronidation Mediated Drug Clearance Using Recombinant UGTs.

Comparison of Relative Activity versus Relative Expression Factors (RAF versus REF) in Predicting Glucuronidation Mediated Drug Clearance Using Recombinant UGTs.

Purpose: Predicting the quantitative fraction of glucuronidation (fgluc) by individual UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes (UGTs) is challenging due to the lack of selective inhibitors and inconsistent activity of recombinant UGT systems (rUGTs). Our study compares the relative expression versus activity factors (REF versus RAF) to predict fgluc based on rUGT data to human liver and intestinal microsomes (HLM and HIM).

Methods: REF scalars were derived from a previous in-house proteomics study for eleven UGT enzymes (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17), whereas RAF was calculated by measuring activities in rUGTs to microsomes of selective UGT probe substrates. Protein-normalized activity factor (pnAF) values were generated after correcting activity of individual UGTs to their corresponding protein abundance. The utility of REF and RAF in predicting fgluc was assessed for three UGT substrates-diclofenac, vorinostat, and raltegravir.

Results: The REF values ranged from 0.02 to 1.75, RAF based on activity obtained in rUGTs to HLM/HIM were from 0.1 to 274. pnAF values were ~ 5 to 80-fold, except for UGT2B4 and UGT2B15, where pnAF was ~ 180 and > 1000, respectively. The results revealed confounding effect of differential specific activities (per pmol) of rUGTs in fgluc prediction.

Conclusion: The data suggest that the activity of UGT enzymes was significantly lower when compared to their activity in microsomes at the same absolute protein amount (pmol). Collectively, results of this study demonstrate poor and variable specific activity of different rUGTs (per pmol protein), as determined by pnAF values, which should be considered in fgluc scaling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信