牙科行为支持:我们能否改进有关患者体验的定性研究?

Q3 Dentistry
Richard D. Holmes
{"title":"牙科行为支持:我们能否改进有关患者体验的定性研究?","authors":"Richard D. Holmes","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01040-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Databases included Embase, Medline (via OVID) and PsycINFO (via EBSCO). Studies referenced within included review articles were additionally screened for relevance. This review focused upon qualitative research studies and their use of dental behaviour support (DBS) tools to support dental care. Included studies were restricted to those in English and published since 1997. Screening of studies involved several authors according to pre-agreed inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the event of disagreement, a third author mediated the collaborative discussion. Included studies first provided baseline study information including the type of qualitative research, the population studied and details of the type(s) of DBS under investigation. Then the qualitative data generated by each study, together with any interpretation provided by the authors, was entered onto bespoke data collection forms. A thematic synthesis approach was adopted. The authors generated new themes supported by selected quotations. The methodological quality of each included study was explored through a recognised tool and the level of confidence provided by each study was informed by the GRADE-CERQual assessment process. Twenty-three studies were included. Most studies used semi-structured interviews, followed by focus groups and a small number of video diaries. For most studies, the focus was upon the dental care of children with a good proportion of these exploring dental general anaesthesia (DGA). Indeed, DGA was the most studied DBS technique. Whilst some studies explored adults’ experiences of DBS, none of the included studies centred upon medically compromised or older adults. The review authors identified five themes following data synthesis. These themes included the following areas (abridged and modified from the review paper): trust; information sharing; control and autonomy; perceived treatment success and failure of DBS techniques; and the longer-term impact of DBS techniques upon patients. Qualitative research has more to offer our understanding of DBS techniques and the impact they have upon patient care experience. There is a need for research to explore a wider range of DBS techniques used in isolation or in combination. Patient reported experiences of care should be considered in the development of outcome measures and any related DBS Core Outcome Set.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 3","pages":"156-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01040-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental behaviour support: can we improve qualitative research on patient experience?\",\"authors\":\"Richard D. Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41432-024-01040-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Databases included Embase, Medline (via OVID) and PsycINFO (via EBSCO). Studies referenced within included review articles were additionally screened for relevance. This review focused upon qualitative research studies and their use of dental behaviour support (DBS) tools to support dental care. Included studies were restricted to those in English and published since 1997. Screening of studies involved several authors according to pre-agreed inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the event of disagreement, a third author mediated the collaborative discussion. Included studies first provided baseline study information including the type of qualitative research, the population studied and details of the type(s) of DBS under investigation. Then the qualitative data generated by each study, together with any interpretation provided by the authors, was entered onto bespoke data collection forms. A thematic synthesis approach was adopted. The authors generated new themes supported by selected quotations. The methodological quality of each included study was explored through a recognised tool and the level of confidence provided by each study was informed by the GRADE-CERQual assessment process. Twenty-three studies were included. Most studies used semi-structured interviews, followed by focus groups and a small number of video diaries. For most studies, the focus was upon the dental care of children with a good proportion of these exploring dental general anaesthesia (DGA). Indeed, DGA was the most studied DBS technique. Whilst some studies explored adults’ experiences of DBS, none of the included studies centred upon medically compromised or older adults. The review authors identified five themes following data synthesis. These themes included the following areas (abridged and modified from the review paper): trust; information sharing; control and autonomy; perceived treatment success and failure of DBS techniques; and the longer-term impact of DBS techniques upon patients. Qualitative research has more to offer our understanding of DBS techniques and the impact they have upon patient care experience. There is a need for research to explore a wider range of DBS techniques used in isolation or in combination. Patient reported experiences of care should be considered in the development of outcome measures and any related DBS Core Outcome Set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"156-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01040-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01040-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01040-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据来源:数据库包括 Embase、Medline(通过 OVID)和 PsycINFO(通过 EBSCO)。此外,还对纳入的综述文章中引用的研究进行了相关性筛选:本综述重点关注定性研究及其使用牙科行为支持(DBS)工具支持牙科护理的情况。纳入的研究仅限于 1997 年以来发表的英文研究。多位作者根据事先商定的纳入和排除标准对研究进行筛选。在出现分歧的情况下,由第三位作者进行协调讨论:纳入的研究首先提供了基线研究信息,包括定性研究的类型、研究人群以及所调查的 DBS 类型的详细信息。然后,将每项研究产生的定性数据以及作者提供的任何解释输入定制的数据收集表中。采用主题综合法。作者根据所选引文生成新的主题。每项纳入研究的方法学质量都通过一个公认的工具进行了探讨,每项研究的可信度都通过 GRADE-CERQual 评估程序进行了评估:结果:共纳入 23 项研究。大多数研究采用半结构式访谈,其次是焦点小组和少量视频日记。大多数研究的重点是儿童牙科护理,其中相当一部分研究探讨了牙科全身麻醉(DGA)。事实上,牙科全身麻醉是研究最多的 DBS 技术。虽然有一些研究探讨了成人使用 DBS 的经验,但所纳入的研究都不是以有医疗缺陷的成人或老年人为中心的。综述作者在对数据进行综合后确定了五个主题。这些主题包括以下方面(根据综述论文进行了删节和修改):信任;信息共享;控制和自主;对 DBS 技术治疗成功和失败的感知;以及 DBS 技术对患者的长期影响:定性研究更有助于我们了解 DBS 技术及其对患者护理体验的影响。有必要开展研究,探索更多单独使用或组合使用的 DBS 技术。在制定结果衡量标准和相关的 DBS 核心结果集时,应考虑患者报告的护理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dental behaviour support: can we improve qualitative research on patient experience?
Databases included Embase, Medline (via OVID) and PsycINFO (via EBSCO). Studies referenced within included review articles were additionally screened for relevance. This review focused upon qualitative research studies and their use of dental behaviour support (DBS) tools to support dental care. Included studies were restricted to those in English and published since 1997. Screening of studies involved several authors according to pre-agreed inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the event of disagreement, a third author mediated the collaborative discussion. Included studies first provided baseline study information including the type of qualitative research, the population studied and details of the type(s) of DBS under investigation. Then the qualitative data generated by each study, together with any interpretation provided by the authors, was entered onto bespoke data collection forms. A thematic synthesis approach was adopted. The authors generated new themes supported by selected quotations. The methodological quality of each included study was explored through a recognised tool and the level of confidence provided by each study was informed by the GRADE-CERQual assessment process. Twenty-three studies were included. Most studies used semi-structured interviews, followed by focus groups and a small number of video diaries. For most studies, the focus was upon the dental care of children with a good proportion of these exploring dental general anaesthesia (DGA). Indeed, DGA was the most studied DBS technique. Whilst some studies explored adults’ experiences of DBS, none of the included studies centred upon medically compromised or older adults. The review authors identified five themes following data synthesis. These themes included the following areas (abridged and modified from the review paper): trust; information sharing; control and autonomy; perceived treatment success and failure of DBS techniques; and the longer-term impact of DBS techniques upon patients. Qualitative research has more to offer our understanding of DBS techniques and the impact they have upon patient care experience. There is a need for research to explore a wider range of DBS techniques used in isolation or in combination. Patient reported experiences of care should be considered in the development of outcome measures and any related DBS Core Outcome Set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信