晚发性原发性先天性、青少年和继发性开角型青光眼中的改良黏液小梁切开术与改良小梁切开术。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ghasem Fakhraie, Shabnam Ansari, Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei, Nikoo Hamzeh, Zakieh Vahedian, Alireza Beikmarzehei
{"title":"晚发性原发性先天性、青少年和继发性开角型青光眼中的改良黏液小梁切开术与改良小梁切开术。","authors":"Ghasem Fakhraie, Shabnam Ansari, Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei, Nikoo Hamzeh, Zakieh Vahedian, Alireza Beikmarzehei","doi":"10.1177/11206721241273977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare modified viscotrabeculotomy (VCO-Tbo) to modified trabeculotomy (Tbo) in late-onset primary congenital, juvenile open-angle, steroid-induced, and pigmentary glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to VCO-Tbo and Tbo groups in this study. Intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medications, and success/failure rates were assessed. A linear mixed model was used to compare the change trend at different follow-up times. Survival time was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier graph and Log-Rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean IOP at 1, 3, and 12 months in the VCO-Tbo group was 14.1 ± 3.1, 15.9 ± 3 and 17 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP at the same time points in the Tbo group was 15.9 ± 3.3, 17.6 ± 3.5 and 18.4 ± 3.2 mmHg (P = 0.051, 0.058, 0.088, respectively). The VCO-Tbo group had significantly lower IOP after six months (16.5 ± 4.1 mmHg vs. 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg; p = 0.031) and by the last visit (16.8 ± 2.1 mmHg vs. 18.8 ± 2 mmHg; p = 0.013). The reduction in the number of medications was significant in both groups compared to baseline (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.450). The complete and qualified success rate was 43.9% and 34.1% in the VCO-Tbo group and 46.8% and 10.6% in the Tbo group at the final follow-up (p = 0.040, and 0.039, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both procedures are effective in IOP and medication reduction. The survival time and efficacy of modified trabeculotomy can be augmented by injecting cohesive viscoelastic in the Schlemm's canal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified viscotrabeculotomy versus modified trabeculotomy in late-onset primary congenital, juvenile, and secondary open-angle glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ghasem Fakhraie, Shabnam Ansari, Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei, Nikoo Hamzeh, Zakieh Vahedian, Alireza Beikmarzehei\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721241273977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare modified viscotrabeculotomy (VCO-Tbo) to modified trabeculotomy (Tbo) in late-onset primary congenital, juvenile open-angle, steroid-induced, and pigmentary glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to VCO-Tbo and Tbo groups in this study. Intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medications, and success/failure rates were assessed. A linear mixed model was used to compare the change trend at different follow-up times. Survival time was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier graph and Log-Rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean IOP at 1, 3, and 12 months in the VCO-Tbo group was 14.1 ± 3.1, 15.9 ± 3 and 17 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP at the same time points in the Tbo group was 15.9 ± 3.3, 17.6 ± 3.5 and 18.4 ± 3.2 mmHg (P = 0.051, 0.058, 0.088, respectively). The VCO-Tbo group had significantly lower IOP after six months (16.5 ± 4.1 mmHg vs. 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg; p = 0.031) and by the last visit (16.8 ± 2.1 mmHg vs. 18.8 ± 2 mmHg; p = 0.013). The reduction in the number of medications was significant in both groups compared to baseline (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.450). The complete and qualified success rate was 43.9% and 34.1% in the VCO-Tbo group and 46.8% and 10.6% in the Tbo group at the final follow-up (p = 0.040, and 0.039, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both procedures are effective in IOP and medication reduction. The survival time and efficacy of modified trabeculotomy can be augmented by injecting cohesive viscoelastic in the Schlemm's canal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241273977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241273977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较改良黏液小梁切开术(VCO-Tbo)和改良小梁切开术(Tbo)在晚发原发性先天性、青少年开角型、类固醇诱发和色素性青光眼中的应用:本研究将患者随机分配到 VCO-Tbo 组和 Tbo 组。对眼压(IOP)、抗青光眼药物和成功率/失败率进行评估。采用线性混合模型比较不同随访时间的变化趋势。采用 Kaplan-Meier 图和 Log-Rank 检验对生存时间进行评估:结果:VCO-Tbo 组在 1、3 和 12 个月时的平均眼压分别为 14.1 ± 3.1、15.9 ± 3 和 17 ± 3.1 mmHg。Tbo 组在相同时间点的平均眼压分别为 15.9 ± 3.3、17.6 ± 3.5 和 18.4 ± 3.2 mmHg(P = 0.051、0.058、0.088)。VCO-Tbo 组在六个月后(16.5 ± 4.1 mmHg vs. 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg;P = 0.031)和最后一次就诊时(16.8 ± 2.1 mmHg vs. 18.8 ± 2 mmHg;P = 0.013)眼压明显降低。与基线相比,两组患者的用药次数均有显著减少(P 结论:两组患者的用药次数均有显著减少:两种手术都能有效降低眼压和减少用药。通过在 Schlemm's 管注入粘性粘弹剂,可以延长改良小梁切开术的存活时间并提高其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified viscotrabeculotomy versus modified trabeculotomy in late-onset primary congenital, juvenile, and secondary open-angle glaucoma.

Purpose: To compare modified viscotrabeculotomy (VCO-Tbo) to modified trabeculotomy (Tbo) in late-onset primary congenital, juvenile open-angle, steroid-induced, and pigmentary glaucoma.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to VCO-Tbo and Tbo groups in this study. Intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medications, and success/failure rates were assessed. A linear mixed model was used to compare the change trend at different follow-up times. Survival time was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier graph and Log-Rank test.

Results: The mean IOP at 1, 3, and 12 months in the VCO-Tbo group was 14.1 ± 3.1, 15.9 ± 3 and 17 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP at the same time points in the Tbo group was 15.9 ± 3.3, 17.6 ± 3.5 and 18.4 ± 3.2 mmHg (P = 0.051, 0.058, 0.088, respectively). The VCO-Tbo group had significantly lower IOP after six months (16.5 ± 4.1 mmHg vs. 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg; p = 0.031) and by the last visit (16.8 ± 2.1 mmHg vs. 18.8 ± 2 mmHg; p = 0.013). The reduction in the number of medications was significant in both groups compared to baseline (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.450). The complete and qualified success rate was 43.9% and 34.1% in the VCO-Tbo group and 46.8% and 10.6% in the Tbo group at the final follow-up (p = 0.040, and 0.039, respectively).

Conclusion: Both procedures are effective in IOP and medication reduction. The survival time and efficacy of modified trabeculotomy can be augmented by injecting cohesive viscoelastic in the Schlemm's canal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信