基于DNA条形码、UPLC-Q-TOF-MS、UPLC指纹图谱和化学计量学的大戟及其假冒掺假产品的鉴定。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Guangjiao You, Fangjie Hou, Liyun Niu, Shaonan Wang, Lizhi Wang, Lili Sun, Xiaoliang Ren
{"title":"基于DNA条形码、UPLC-Q-TOF-MS、UPLC指纹图谱和化学计量学的大戟及其假冒掺假产品的鉴定。","authors":"Guangjiao You,&nbsp;Fangjie Hou,&nbsp;Liyun Niu,&nbsp;Shaonan Wang,&nbsp;Lizhi Wang,&nbsp;Lili Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoliang Ren","doi":"10.1002/bmc.5978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Euphorbiae pekinensis</i> Radix (EPR) is a traditional Chinese herb commonly used to treat edema, pleural effusion, and ascites. However, counterfeit and adulterated products often appear in the market because of the homonym phenomenon, similar appearance, and artificial forgery of Chinese herbs. This study comprehensively evaluated the quality of EPR using multiple methods. The DNA barcode technique was used to identify EPR, while the UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technique was utilized to analyze the chemical composition of EPR. A total of 15 tannin and phenolic acid components were identified. Furthermore, UPLC fingerprints of EPR and its common counterfeit products were established, and unsupervised and supervised pattern recognition models were developed using these fingerprints. The backpropagation artificial neural network and counter-propagation artificial neural network models accurately identified counterfeit and adulterated products, with a counterfeit ratio of more than 25%. Finally, the contents of the chemical markers 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, ellagic acid, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-<span>d</span>-xylopyranoside, and 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid were determined to range from 0.05% to 0.11%, 1.95% to 8.52%, 0.27% to 0.86%, and 0.10% to 0.42%, respectively. This proposed strategy offers a general procedure for identifying Chinese herbs and distinguishing between counterfeit and adulterated products.</p>","PeriodicalId":8861,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Chromatography","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Euphorbiae pekinensis Radix and its counterfeit and adulterated products based on DNA barcode, UPLC-Q-TOF-MS, UPLC fingerprint, and chemometrics\",\"authors\":\"Guangjiao You,&nbsp;Fangjie Hou,&nbsp;Liyun Niu,&nbsp;Shaonan Wang,&nbsp;Lizhi Wang,&nbsp;Lili Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoliang Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bmc.5978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Euphorbiae pekinensis</i> Radix (EPR) is a traditional Chinese herb commonly used to treat edema, pleural effusion, and ascites. However, counterfeit and adulterated products often appear in the market because of the homonym phenomenon, similar appearance, and artificial forgery of Chinese herbs. This study comprehensively evaluated the quality of EPR using multiple methods. The DNA barcode technique was used to identify EPR, while the UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technique was utilized to analyze the chemical composition of EPR. A total of 15 tannin and phenolic acid components were identified. Furthermore, UPLC fingerprints of EPR and its common counterfeit products were established, and unsupervised and supervised pattern recognition models were developed using these fingerprints. The backpropagation artificial neural network and counter-propagation artificial neural network models accurately identified counterfeit and adulterated products, with a counterfeit ratio of more than 25%. Finally, the contents of the chemical markers 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, ellagic acid, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-<span>d</span>-xylopyranoside, and 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid were determined to range from 0.05% to 0.11%, 1.95% to 8.52%, 0.27% to 0.86%, and 0.10% to 0.42%, respectively. This proposed strategy offers a general procedure for identifying Chinese herbs and distinguishing between counterfeit and adulterated products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Chromatography\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Chromatography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.5978\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Chromatography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.5978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大戟是一种传统中草药,常用于治疗水肿、胸腔积液和腹水。然而,由于中草药的同名现象、外观相似和人为伪造等原因,市场上经常出现假冒伪劣产品。本研究采用多种方法对 EPR 的质量进行了综合评价。DNA条形码技术被用来鉴定EPR,UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术被用来分析EPR的化学成分。共鉴定出 15 种单宁和酚酸成分。此外,还建立了 EPR 及其常见假冒产品的 UPLC 指纹,并利用这些指纹建立了无监督和有监督模式识别模型。反向传播人工神经网络和反向传播人工神经网络模型准确识别了假冒产品和掺假产品,假冒率超过 25%。最后,化学标记物 3,3'-二-O-甲基鞣花酸-4'-O-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷、鞣花酸、3,3'-二-O-甲基鞣花酸-4'-O-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷、3,3'-二-O-甲基鞣花酸的含量分别为 0.05% 至 0.11%、1.95% 至 8.52%、0.27% 至 0.86% 和 0.10% 至 0.42%。这一建议策略为鉴别中草药和区分假冒伪劣产品提供了一个通用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Euphorbiae pekinensis Radix and its counterfeit and adulterated products based on DNA barcode, UPLC-Q-TOF-MS, UPLC fingerprint, and chemometrics

Euphorbiae pekinensis Radix (EPR) is a traditional Chinese herb commonly used to treat edema, pleural effusion, and ascites. However, counterfeit and adulterated products often appear in the market because of the homonym phenomenon, similar appearance, and artificial forgery of Chinese herbs. This study comprehensively evaluated the quality of EPR using multiple methods. The DNA barcode technique was used to identify EPR, while the UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technique was utilized to analyze the chemical composition of EPR. A total of 15 tannin and phenolic acid components were identified. Furthermore, UPLC fingerprints of EPR and its common counterfeit products were established, and unsupervised and supervised pattern recognition models were developed using these fingerprints. The backpropagation artificial neural network and counter-propagation artificial neural network models accurately identified counterfeit and adulterated products, with a counterfeit ratio of more than 25%. Finally, the contents of the chemical markers 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, ellagic acid, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-d-xylopyranoside, and 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid were determined to range from 0.05% to 0.11%, 1.95% to 8.52%, 0.27% to 0.86%, and 0.10% to 0.42%, respectively. This proposed strategy offers a general procedure for identifying Chinese herbs and distinguishing between counterfeit and adulterated products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Chromatography
Biomedical Chromatography 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Chromatography is devoted to the publication of original papers on the applications of chromatography and allied techniques in the biological and medical sciences. Research papers and review articles cover the methods and techniques relevant to the separation, identification and determination of substances in biochemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cell biology, clinical chemistry, pharmacology and related disciplines. These include the analysis of body fluids, cells and tissues, purification of biologically important compounds, pharmaco-kinetics and sequencing methods using HPLC, GC, HPLC-MS, TLC, paper chromatography, affinity chromatography, gel filtration, electrophoresis and related techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信