前臂骨折的挪威人和移民的后续骨折风险:一项队列研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sepideh Semsarian, Tone K Omsland, Espen Heen, Ahmed Ali Madar, Frede Frihagen, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Lene B Solberg, Wender Figved, Jens-Meinhard Stutzer, Tove T Borgen, Camilla Andreasen, Ann Kristin Hansen, Åshild Bjørnerem, Cecilie Dahl
{"title":"前臂骨折的挪威人和移民的后续骨折风险:一项队列研究。","authors":"Sepideh Semsarian, Tone K Omsland, Espen Heen, Ahmed Ali Madar, Frede Frihagen, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Lene B Solberg, Wender Figved, Jens-Meinhard Stutzer, Tove T Borgen, Camilla Andreasen, Ann Kristin Hansen, Åshild Bjørnerem, Cecilie Dahl","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01419-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study investigated subsequent fracture risk following a forearm fracture in three country of birth categories: Norway, Europe and North America, and other countries. Subsequent fracture risk was modestly higher in Norwegian-born individuals compared to the two other groups. Secondary fracture prevention should be recommended regardless of country background.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Fracture risk is higher in patients with a previous fracture, but whether subsequent fracture risk differs by origin of birth is unknown. This study explores subsequent fracture risk in patients with an index forearm fracture according to region of birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide data on forearm fractures in patients ≥ 18 years in 2008-2019 were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. Index fractures were identified by ICD-10 code S52, whereas subsequent fractures included any ICD-10 fracture code. Data on country of birth were from Statistics Norway and included three regional categories: (1) Norway, (2) other Europe and North America and (3) other countries. Direct age standardization and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 143,476 individuals with an index forearm fracture, 35,361 sustained a subsequent fracture. Norwegian-born forearm fracture patients had the highest subsequent fracture rates (516/10,000 person-years in women and 380 in men). People born outside Europe and North America had the lowest rates (278/10,000 person-years in women and 286 in men). Compared to Norwegian-born individuals, the hazard ratios (HRs) of subsequent fracture in individuals from Europe and North American were 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) in women and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in men. The corresponding HRs in individuals from other countries were 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.84) in women and 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.92) in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals born outside Norway had a lower subsequent fracture risk than Norwegian-born individuals; however, subsequent fracture risk increased with age in all groups. Our results indicate that secondary fracture prevention should be recommended regardless of region of origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subsequent fracture risk in Norwegians and immigrants with an index forearm fracture: a cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Sepideh Semsarian, Tone K Omsland, Espen Heen, Ahmed Ali Madar, Frede Frihagen, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Lene B Solberg, Wender Figved, Jens-Meinhard Stutzer, Tove T Borgen, Camilla Andreasen, Ann Kristin Hansen, Åshild Bjørnerem, Cecilie Dahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-024-01419-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study investigated subsequent fracture risk following a forearm fracture in three country of birth categories: Norway, Europe and North America, and other countries. Subsequent fracture risk was modestly higher in Norwegian-born individuals compared to the two other groups. Secondary fracture prevention should be recommended regardless of country background.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Fracture risk is higher in patients with a previous fracture, but whether subsequent fracture risk differs by origin of birth is unknown. This study explores subsequent fracture risk in patients with an index forearm fracture according to region of birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide data on forearm fractures in patients ≥ 18 years in 2008-2019 were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. Index fractures were identified by ICD-10 code S52, whereas subsequent fractures included any ICD-10 fracture code. Data on country of birth were from Statistics Norway and included three regional categories: (1) Norway, (2) other Europe and North America and (3) other countries. Direct age standardization and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 143,476 individuals with an index forearm fracture, 35,361 sustained a subsequent fracture. Norwegian-born forearm fracture patients had the highest subsequent fracture rates (516/10,000 person-years in women and 380 in men). People born outside Europe and North America had the lowest rates (278/10,000 person-years in women and 286 in men). Compared to Norwegian-born individuals, the hazard ratios (HRs) of subsequent fracture in individuals from Europe and North American were 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) in women and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in men. The corresponding HRs in individuals from other countries were 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.84) in women and 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.92) in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals born outside Norway had a lower subsequent fracture risk than Norwegian-born individuals; however, subsequent fracture risk increased with age in all groups. Our results indicate that secondary fracture prevention should be recommended regardless of region of origin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01419-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01419-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了三个出生国的前臂骨折后的后续骨折风险:挪威、欧洲和北美以及其他国家。与其他两组人相比,挪威出生的人后续骨折风险略高。无论国家背景如何,都应建议进行二级骨折预防:背景:曾有骨折经历的患者骨折风险较高,但出生地不同是否会导致后续骨折风险不同尚不清楚。本研究根据出生地区探讨了指数性前臂骨折患者的后续骨折风险:从挪威患者登记处和挪威统计局获得了2008-2019年全国前臂骨折患者(年龄≥18岁)的数据。指数骨折由ICD-10代码S52确定,而后续骨折包括任何ICD-10骨折代码。出生国数据来自挪威统计局,包括三个地区类别:(1) 挪威;(2) 其他欧洲和北美;(3) 其他国家。数据分析采用了直接年龄标准化和考克斯比例危险回归法:在143,476名前臂骨折患者中,有35,361人再次发生骨折。挪威出生的前臂骨折患者的后续骨折率最高(女性为516/10,000人年,男性为380/10,000人年)。而出生在欧洲和北美以外地区的人的后续骨折率最低(女性为278/10,000人年,男性为286/10,000人年)。与挪威出生的人相比,欧洲和北美出生的人随后发生骨折的危险比(HRs)分别为:女性0.93(95% CI 0.88-0.98),男性0.85(95% CI 0.79-0.92)。其他国家的相应HR值分别为:女性0.76(95% CI 0.70-0.84),男性0.82(95% CI 0.74-0.92):结论:与挪威出生的人相比,在挪威以外出生的人随后发生骨折的风险较低;然而,在所有人群中,随后发生骨折的风险随着年龄的增长而增加。我们的研究结果表明,无论原籍地区如何,都应建议进行二级骨折预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Subsequent fracture risk in Norwegians and immigrants with an index forearm fracture: a cohort study.

Subsequent fracture risk in Norwegians and immigrants with an index forearm fracture: a cohort study.

The current study investigated subsequent fracture risk following a forearm fracture in three country of birth categories: Norway, Europe and North America, and other countries. Subsequent fracture risk was modestly higher in Norwegian-born individuals compared to the two other groups. Secondary fracture prevention should be recommended regardless of country background.

Background: Fracture risk is higher in patients with a previous fracture, but whether subsequent fracture risk differs by origin of birth is unknown. This study explores subsequent fracture risk in patients with an index forearm fracture according to region of birth.

Methods: Nationwide data on forearm fractures in patients ≥ 18 years in 2008-2019 were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. Index fractures were identified by ICD-10 code S52, whereas subsequent fractures included any ICD-10 fracture code. Data on country of birth were from Statistics Norway and included three regional categories: (1) Norway, (2) other Europe and North America and (3) other countries. Direct age standardization and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to analyse the data.

Results: Among 143,476 individuals with an index forearm fracture, 35,361 sustained a subsequent fracture. Norwegian-born forearm fracture patients had the highest subsequent fracture rates (516/10,000 person-years in women and 380 in men). People born outside Europe and North America had the lowest rates (278/10,000 person-years in women and 286 in men). Compared to Norwegian-born individuals, the hazard ratios (HRs) of subsequent fracture in individuals from Europe and North American were 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) in women and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in men. The corresponding HRs in individuals from other countries were 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.84) in women and 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.92) in men.

Conclusion: Individuals born outside Norway had a lower subsequent fracture risk than Norwegian-born individuals; however, subsequent fracture risk increased with age in all groups. Our results indicate that secondary fracture prevention should be recommended regardless of region of origin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信