耳鼻喉科的成本透明度:新英格兰地区医院门诊程序成本信息。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Samuel Ding , Alec Chang , Monica O'Brien , Grace Materne , Julianna Mastropierro , Timothy Mikulski , David O'Neil Danis III , Emily Gall , Kathryn Y. Noonan
{"title":"耳鼻喉科的成本透明度:新英格兰地区医院门诊程序成本信息。","authors":"Samuel Ding ,&nbsp;Alec Chang ,&nbsp;Monica O'Brien ,&nbsp;Grace Materne ,&nbsp;Julianna Mastropierro ,&nbsp;Timothy Mikulski ,&nbsp;David O'Neil Danis III ,&nbsp;Emily Gall ,&nbsp;Kathryn Y. Noonan","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Healthcare costs have dramatically increased, resulting in barriers to care for many Americans. To address this, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services implemented a price transparency mandate, requiring hospitals to provide cost-estimate tools. This study evaluates the accessibility and usability of these tools for common otolaryngology outpatient procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Cost transparency was investigated using cost-estimate tools from websites of the seven New England hospitals ranked on the US News top 50 list. Ten common current procedural terminology codes were used to collect data on availability of cost information, cost comparison, and ease-of-use by six investigators acting as “patients” for each hospital and procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All investigated hospitals had cost-estimate tools, with a 35.7 % mean success rate of generating an estimate. The mean times to cost-estimate tools and generated estimates were 35.69 and 34.15 s, respectively. Pre-insurance costs varied by hospital and procedure; creation of eardrum had the largest range. Seven out of ten procedures resulted in lower post-insurance costs. The mean ease-of-use rating was 5.76 out of ten.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All hospitals complied with the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services price transparency policy. The information available is sparse, difficult to access, and frequently lacks specific estimates for common otolaryngology procedures. Although hospitals are following new Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services mandates, the estimators currently in existence are ineffective tools for financial decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 6","pages":"Article 104413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost transparency in otolaryngology: Outpatient procedures cost information at New England hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Ding ,&nbsp;Alec Chang ,&nbsp;Monica O'Brien ,&nbsp;Grace Materne ,&nbsp;Julianna Mastropierro ,&nbsp;Timothy Mikulski ,&nbsp;David O'Neil Danis III ,&nbsp;Emily Gall ,&nbsp;Kathryn Y. Noonan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Healthcare costs have dramatically increased, resulting in barriers to care for many Americans. To address this, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services implemented a price transparency mandate, requiring hospitals to provide cost-estimate tools. This study evaluates the accessibility and usability of these tools for common otolaryngology outpatient procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Cost transparency was investigated using cost-estimate tools from websites of the seven New England hospitals ranked on the US News top 50 list. Ten common current procedural terminology codes were used to collect data on availability of cost information, cost comparison, and ease-of-use by six investigators acting as “patients” for each hospital and procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All investigated hospitals had cost-estimate tools, with a 35.7 % mean success rate of generating an estimate. The mean times to cost-estimate tools and generated estimates were 35.69 and 34.15 s, respectively. Pre-insurance costs varied by hospital and procedure; creation of eardrum had the largest range. Seven out of ten procedures resulted in lower post-insurance costs. The mean ease-of-use rating was 5.76 out of ten.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All hospitals complied with the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services price transparency policy. The information available is sparse, difficult to access, and frequently lacks specific estimates for common otolaryngology procedures. Although hospitals are following new Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services mandates, the estimators currently in existence are ineffective tools for financial decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924001996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924001996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医疗保健成本急剧增加,导致许多美国人无法获得医疗保健服务。为解决这一问题,美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)实施了价格透明化规定,要求医院提供成本估算工具。本研究评估了这些工具对常见耳鼻喉科门诊手术的可及性和可用性:本研究使用 US News 排名前 50 位的七家新英格兰医院网站上的成本估算工具对成本透明度进行了调查。六名调查人员以 "患者 "身份对每家医院和每项手术的成本信息可用性、成本比较和易用性进行了调查:所有接受调查的医院都有成本估算工具,平均估算成功率为 35.7%。使用成本估算工具和生成估算的平均时间分别为 35.69 秒和 34.15 秒。不同医院和不同手术的保险前成本各不相同;鼓膜成形术的成本范围最大。十项手术中有七项的保险后成本较低。平均易用性评分为 5.76(满分 10 分):所有医院都遵守了医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心的价格透明政策。现有信息稀少,难以获取,而且经常缺乏对常见耳鼻喉科手术的具体估算。尽管医院遵守了医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心的新规定,但现有的估算工具并不能有效地用于财务决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost transparency in otolaryngology: Outpatient procedures cost information at New England hospitals

Purpose

Healthcare costs have dramatically increased, resulting in barriers to care for many Americans. To address this, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented a price transparency mandate, requiring hospitals to provide cost-estimate tools. This study evaluates the accessibility and usability of these tools for common otolaryngology outpatient procedures.

Materials and methods

Cost transparency was investigated using cost-estimate tools from websites of the seven New England hospitals ranked on the US News top 50 list. Ten common current procedural terminology codes were used to collect data on availability of cost information, cost comparison, and ease-of-use by six investigators acting as “patients” for each hospital and procedure.

Results

All investigated hospitals had cost-estimate tools, with a 35.7 % mean success rate of generating an estimate. The mean times to cost-estimate tools and generated estimates were 35.69 and 34.15 s, respectively. Pre-insurance costs varied by hospital and procedure; creation of eardrum had the largest range. Seven out of ten procedures resulted in lower post-insurance costs. The mean ease-of-use rating was 5.76 out of ten.

Conclusion

All hospitals complied with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services price transparency policy. The information available is sparse, difficult to access, and frequently lacks specific estimates for common otolaryngology procedures. Although hospitals are following new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mandates, the estimators currently in existence are ineffective tools for financial decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信