通过改良目标管理训练和无差错学习辅助技术提高成年智障人士的任务执行能力:随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Funda Ertas-Spantgar, Helmut Hildebrandt, Alexander Gabel, Ina Schiering, Sandra Verena Müller
{"title":"通过改良目标管理训练和无差错学习辅助技术提高成年智障人士的任务执行能力:随机对照试验。","authors":"Funda Ertas-Spantgar, Helmut Hildebrandt, Alexander Gabel, Ina Schiering, Sandra Verena Müller","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2024.2384518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with intellectual disabilities often fail to learn complex tasks. Modified Goal Management Training (mGMT) or Errorless Learning combined with assistive technology (App + EL) can help. The goal is to demonstrate the effectiveness of mGMT and/or App + EL in learning complex tasks. We employed a randomized controlled crossover design. One group started with mGMT (<i>N</i> = 16), and the other with App + EL (N = 15). We compared their performance with that of a passive control group (N = 15). The training consisted of six sessions of 30 minutes each. Success was analyzed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Three different tasks were assessed before and after each intervention period: \"Practiced\", \"Non-Practiced\", or \"Previously Practiced\". Generalization was evaluated through neuropsychological tests. Results indicated that both interventions significantly improved \"Practiced\" tasks compared with \"Non-Practiced\" tasks and the control group. Crossing the intervention did not interfere with the stable performance on the \"Previously Practiced\" task. However, starting with mGMT reduced, but did not eliminate, the efficacy of App + EL after crossing, but this pattern was not observed for the reverse sequence. Only the Tower of London task documented improvements related to interventions. In conclusion, the mGMT and App + EL were effective in learning complex tasks and retaining performance after learning a second task.<b>Trial registration:</b> German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00021674.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing task performance in adults with intellectual disability through modified goal management training and assistive technology with errorless learning: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Funda Ertas-Spantgar, Helmut Hildebrandt, Alexander Gabel, Ina Schiering, Sandra Verena Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2024.2384518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals with intellectual disabilities often fail to learn complex tasks. Modified Goal Management Training (mGMT) or Errorless Learning combined with assistive technology (App + EL) can help. The goal is to demonstrate the effectiveness of mGMT and/or App + EL in learning complex tasks. We employed a randomized controlled crossover design. One group started with mGMT (<i>N</i> = 16), and the other with App + EL (N = 15). We compared their performance with that of a passive control group (N = 15). The training consisted of six sessions of 30 minutes each. Success was analyzed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Three different tasks were assessed before and after each intervention period: \\\"Practiced\\\", \\\"Non-Practiced\\\", or \\\"Previously Practiced\\\". Generalization was evaluated through neuropsychological tests. Results indicated that both interventions significantly improved \\\"Practiced\\\" tasks compared with \\\"Non-Practiced\\\" tasks and the control group. Crossing the intervention did not interfere with the stable performance on the \\\"Previously Practiced\\\" task. However, starting with mGMT reduced, but did not eliminate, the efficacy of App + EL after crossing, but this pattern was not observed for the reverse sequence. Only the Tower of London task documented improvements related to interventions. In conclusion, the mGMT and App + EL were effective in learning complex tasks and retaining performance after learning a second task.<b>Trial registration:</b> German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00021674.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2384518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2384518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智障人士常常无法完成复杂的学习任务。修正目标管理训练(mGMT)或无错误学习(App + EL)结合辅助技术(App + EL)可以帮助他们。我们的目标是证明 mGMT 和/或 App + EL 在学习复杂任务方面的有效性。我们采用了随机对照交叉设计。一组从 mGMT 开始(16 人),另一组从 App + EL 开始(15 人)。我们将他们的成绩与被动对照组(15 人)的成绩进行了比较。训练共进行了六次,每次 30 分钟。成功率采用目标达成量表(GAS)进行分析。在每个干预阶段之前和之后,对三项不同的任务进行了评估:"练习过"、"未练习过 "或 "以前练习过"。通过神经心理学测试评估其通用性。结果表明,与 "未练习 "任务和对照组相比,两种干预措施都明显改善了 "已练习 "任务。在 "以前练习过的 "任务中,交叉干预不会影响稳定的表现。然而,从 mGMT 开始的干预降低了 App + EL 在交叉干预后的效果,但并没有消除这种效果。只有伦敦塔任务记录了与干预有关的改进。总之,mGMT 和 App + EL 能有效学习复杂任务,并在学习第二个任务后保持成绩:德国临床试验注册标识符:DRKS00021674.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing task performance in adults with intellectual disability through modified goal management training and assistive technology with errorless learning: A randomized controlled trial.

Individuals with intellectual disabilities often fail to learn complex tasks. Modified Goal Management Training (mGMT) or Errorless Learning combined with assistive technology (App + EL) can help. The goal is to demonstrate the effectiveness of mGMT and/or App + EL in learning complex tasks. We employed a randomized controlled crossover design. One group started with mGMT (N = 16), and the other with App + EL (N = 15). We compared their performance with that of a passive control group (N = 15). The training consisted of six sessions of 30 minutes each. Success was analyzed using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Three different tasks were assessed before and after each intervention period: "Practiced", "Non-Practiced", or "Previously Practiced". Generalization was evaluated through neuropsychological tests. Results indicated that both interventions significantly improved "Practiced" tasks compared with "Non-Practiced" tasks and the control group. Crossing the intervention did not interfere with the stable performance on the "Previously Practiced" task. However, starting with mGMT reduced, but did not eliminate, the efficacy of App + EL after crossing, but this pattern was not observed for the reverse sequence. Only the Tower of London task documented improvements related to interventions. In conclusion, the mGMT and App + EL were effective in learning complex tasks and retaining performance after learning a second task.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00021674.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信