在玻璃体切除术中使用全氟碳化物液治疗黄斑-视网膜脱离对黄斑皱褶和变形视力没有影响。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mathieu Wurtz, Lea Dormegny, Candice Muller, Tristan Bourcier, Laurent Ballonzoli, David Gaucher, Maher Saleh
{"title":"在玻璃体切除术中使用全氟碳化物液治疗黄斑-视网膜脱离对黄斑皱褶和变形视力没有影响。","authors":"Mathieu Wurtz, Lea Dormegny, Candice Muller, Tristan Bourcier, Laurent Ballonzoli, David Gaucher, Maher Saleh","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare two drainage techniques in macula-off retinal detachment (RD) surgery: perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted drainage and partial subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage without PFCL. We investigated morphological and functional outcomes, focusing on metamorphopsia quantification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty eyes with macula-off RD were retrospectively included. All underwent a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. In the PFCL group, SRF drainage was performed using PFCL. In the partial SRF drainage (SRFD) group, SRF was partially drained through a pre-existing retinal break without PFCL. A follow-up at 3 and 6 months evaluated anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia quantified with M-charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reattachment rates were comparable in the PFCL group (97.5%) and the SRFD group (95%) (p > 0.05). Mean BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.23 ± 0.32 (PFCL group) and 0.15 ± 0.13 (SRFD group) (p = 0.206). Metamorphopsia were reported by 19 patients (47.5%) in the PFCL group and by 12 patients (30%) in the SRFD group (p = 0.332). The mean metamorphopsia score was similar in both groups (0.27 ± 0.12 in the PFCL group and 0.28 ± 0.11 in the SRFD group, p = 0.866). Morphological OCT findings were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Morphological and functional outcomes were similar in PFCL and SRFD groups. Metamorphopsia quantification scores did not improve with PFCL. While both of these techniques might be effective and could be recommended for primary macula-off RD management, potential PFCL toxicity should be kept in mind and its use dedicated to selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfluorocarbon liquid use during vitrectomy for macula-Off Retinal detachment has no impact on Macular folds and Metamorphopsia.\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Wurtz, Lea Dormegny, Candice Muller, Tristan Bourcier, Laurent Ballonzoli, David Gaucher, Maher Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare two drainage techniques in macula-off retinal detachment (RD) surgery: perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted drainage and partial subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage without PFCL. We investigated morphological and functional outcomes, focusing on metamorphopsia quantification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty eyes with macula-off RD were retrospectively included. All underwent a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. In the PFCL group, SRF drainage was performed using PFCL. In the partial SRF drainage (SRFD) group, SRF was partially drained through a pre-existing retinal break without PFCL. A follow-up at 3 and 6 months evaluated anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia quantified with M-charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reattachment rates were comparable in the PFCL group (97.5%) and the SRFD group (95%) (p > 0.05). Mean BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.23 ± 0.32 (PFCL group) and 0.15 ± 0.13 (SRFD group) (p = 0.206). Metamorphopsia were reported by 19 patients (47.5%) in the PFCL group and by 12 patients (30%) in the SRFD group (p = 0.332). The mean metamorphopsia score was similar in both groups (0.27 ± 0.12 in the PFCL group and 0.28 ± 0.11 in the SRFD group, p = 0.866). Morphological OCT findings were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Morphological and functional outcomes were similar in PFCL and SRFD groups. Metamorphopsia quantification scores did not improve with PFCL. While both of these techniques might be effective and could be recommended for primary macula-off RD management, potential PFCL toxicity should be kept in mind and its use dedicated to selected cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004220\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较黄斑脱离视网膜脱离(RD)手术中的两种引流技术:全氟化碳液(PFCL)辅助引流和不使用全氟化碳液的部分视网膜下积液(SRF)引流。我们调查了形态学和功能性结果,重点是变形量化:方法:我们回顾性地纳入了80只患有黄斑脱失性RD的眼睛。所有患者均接受了25号玻璃体旁切除术。在PFCL组,使用PFCL进行SRF引流。在SRF部分引流(SRFD)组中,SRF的部分引流是通过先前存在的视网膜断裂进行的,不使用PFCL。3个月和6个月的随访使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和用M-图表量化的变形视力评估解剖学结果:结果:PFCL 组(97.5%)和 SRFD 组(95%)的再接合率相当(P > 0.05)。平均 BCVA(LogMAR)为 0.23 ± 0.32(PFCL 组)和 0.15 ± 0.13(SRFD 组)(p = 0.206)。PFCL 组中有 19 名患者(47.5%)报告了变形,SRFD 组中有 12 名患者(30%)报告了变形(p = 0.332)。两组患者的平均变形评分相似(PFCL 组为 0.27 ± 0.12,SRFD 组为 0.28 ± 0.11,p = 0.866)。两组的形态学 OCT 结果相当:结论:PFCL 组和 SRFD 组的形态和功能结果相似。结论:PFCL 组和 SRFD 组的形态和功能结果相似。虽然这两种技术都很有效,可推荐用于原发性黄斑脱失 RD 的治疗,但应牢记 PFCL 的潜在毒性,并在选定的病例中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perfluorocarbon liquid use during vitrectomy for macula-Off Retinal detachment has no impact on Macular folds and Metamorphopsia.

Purpose: To compare two drainage techniques in macula-off retinal detachment (RD) surgery: perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted drainage and partial subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage without PFCL. We investigated morphological and functional outcomes, focusing on metamorphopsia quantification.

Methods: Eighty eyes with macula-off RD were retrospectively included. All underwent a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. In the PFCL group, SRF drainage was performed using PFCL. In the partial SRF drainage (SRFD) group, SRF was partially drained through a pre-existing retinal break without PFCL. A follow-up at 3 and 6 months evaluated anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia quantified with M-charts.

Results: Reattachment rates were comparable in the PFCL group (97.5%) and the SRFD group (95%) (p > 0.05). Mean BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.23 ± 0.32 (PFCL group) and 0.15 ± 0.13 (SRFD group) (p = 0.206). Metamorphopsia were reported by 19 patients (47.5%) in the PFCL group and by 12 patients (30%) in the SRFD group (p = 0.332). The mean metamorphopsia score was similar in both groups (0.27 ± 0.12 in the PFCL group and 0.28 ± 0.11 in the SRFD group, p = 0.866). Morphological OCT findings were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: Morphological and functional outcomes were similar in PFCL and SRFD groups. Metamorphopsia quantification scores did not improve with PFCL. While both of these techniques might be effective and could be recommended for primary macula-off RD management, potential PFCL toxicity should be kept in mind and its use dedicated to selected cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信