CPD 在卫生专业技术方面的成功:决定因素和优点。

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Irvin Ong, Michael Joseph Dino, Caroline Marian Enriquez, Trisha Joy Gotinga, Corazon Esluzar, Sharon Cajayon, Arnel Buencamino, Fraulein Pimentel-Tormon, Angelita Rodriguez, Alicia Tablizo
{"title":"CPD 在卫生专业技术方面的成功:决定因素和优点。","authors":"Irvin Ong, Michael Joseph Dino, Caroline Marian Enriquez, Trisha Joy Gotinga, Corazon Esluzar, Sharon Cajayon, Arnel Buencamino, Fraulein Pimentel-Tormon, Angelita Rodriguez, Alicia Tablizo","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuing professional development (CPD) has become a common strategy to address the gaps in knowledge and competencies during the pandemic. Given the drastic changes in the learning environment, this study explored \"technagogy\" or teaching with technology in CPD in the health professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was used to ascertain the determinants and merits of CPD success from the participants' perspectives ( n = 237). The quantitative data underwent structural equation modeling using partial least squares. We also thematically analyzed the qualitative responses and synthesized concurrent findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The structural model accounted for a 64% variance in the CPD success. Its significant direct predictors ( P < .05) were instructional, curriculum, and nurturant effects. From the participants' experiences, we generated four themes as the merits of CPD: learning, teaching, knowledge, and technology scholarships. Finally, we constructed a synthesized model, the CPD Determinants and Intrinsic Assets in Learning, which can offer modest guidance in navigating CPD with technagogy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study findings emphasize the convergence and divergence points as considerations in teaching and learning with technology. It also offers valuable insights into relevant implications of technagogy in CPD, including its theory, practice, policy, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"e6-e13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CPD Success With Technagogy in Health Professions: Determinants and Merits.\",\"authors\":\"Irvin Ong, Michael Joseph Dino, Caroline Marian Enriquez, Trisha Joy Gotinga, Corazon Esluzar, Sharon Cajayon, Arnel Buencamino, Fraulein Pimentel-Tormon, Angelita Rodriguez, Alicia Tablizo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuing professional development (CPD) has become a common strategy to address the gaps in knowledge and competencies during the pandemic. Given the drastic changes in the learning environment, this study explored \\\"technagogy\\\" or teaching with technology in CPD in the health professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was used to ascertain the determinants and merits of CPD success from the participants' perspectives ( n = 237). The quantitative data underwent structural equation modeling using partial least squares. We also thematically analyzed the qualitative responses and synthesized concurrent findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The structural model accounted for a 64% variance in the CPD success. Its significant direct predictors ( P < .05) were instructional, curriculum, and nurturant effects. From the participants' experiences, we generated four themes as the merits of CPD: learning, teaching, knowledge, and technology scholarships. Finally, we constructed a synthesized model, the CPD Determinants and Intrinsic Assets in Learning, which can offer modest guidance in navigating CPD with technagogy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study findings emphasize the convergence and divergence points as considerations in teaching and learning with technology. It also offers valuable insights into relevant implications of technagogy in CPD, including its theory, practice, policy, and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e6-e13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000559\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:持续专业发展(CPD)已成为应对大流行病期间知识和能力缺口的一种常见策略。鉴于学习环境的急剧变化,本研究探讨了卫生专业 CPD 中的 "技术学 "或技术教学:方法:本研究采用混合方法,从参与者(n = 237)的角度出发,确定持续专业发展成功的决定因素和优点。定量数据采用偏最小二乘法进行结构方程建模。我们还对定性回答进行了专题分析,并综合了同时得出的结论:结果:结构模型解释了持续专业发展成功率中 64% 的方差。其重要的直接预测因素(P < .05)是教学、课程和培养效果。从参与者的经验中,我们得出了四个主题,即:学习、教学、知识和技术奖学金,这四个主题是持续专业发展的优点。最后,我们构建了一个综合模型,即持续专业发展的决定因素和学习中的内在资产,该模型可为持续专业发展与技术学的结合提供适度指导:研究结果强调了技术教学中需要考虑的趋同点和分歧点。讨论:研究结果强调了利用技术进行教与学的趋同点和分歧点,也为技术教学法在持续专业发展中的相关影响,包括其理论、实践、政策和研究,提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CPD Success With Technagogy in Health Professions: Determinants and Merits.

Introduction: Continuing professional development (CPD) has become a common strategy to address the gaps in knowledge and competencies during the pandemic. Given the drastic changes in the learning environment, this study explored "technagogy" or teaching with technology in CPD in the health professions.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was used to ascertain the determinants and merits of CPD success from the participants' perspectives ( n = 237). The quantitative data underwent structural equation modeling using partial least squares. We also thematically analyzed the qualitative responses and synthesized concurrent findings.

Results: The structural model accounted for a 64% variance in the CPD success. Its significant direct predictors ( P < .05) were instructional, curriculum, and nurturant effects. From the participants' experiences, we generated four themes as the merits of CPD: learning, teaching, knowledge, and technology scholarships. Finally, we constructed a synthesized model, the CPD Determinants and Intrinsic Assets in Learning, which can offer modest guidance in navigating CPD with technagogy.

Discussion: The study findings emphasize the convergence and divergence points as considerations in teaching and learning with technology. It also offers valuable insights into relevant implications of technagogy in CPD, including its theory, practice, policy, and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信