极端精神状态改变:意识障碍的行为评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seminars in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788807
Neha Dhadwal, Kyle Cunningham, William Pino, Stephen Hampton, David Fischer
{"title":"极端精神状态改变:意识障碍的行为评估。","authors":"Neha Dhadwal, Kyle Cunningham, William Pino, Stephen Hampton, David Fischer","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disorders of consciousness represent altered mental status at its most severe, comprising a continuum between coma, the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, the minimally conscious state, and emergence from the minimally conscious state. Patients often transition between these levels throughout their recovery, and determining a patient's current level can be challenging, particularly in the acute care setting. Although healthcare providers have classically relied on a bedside neurological exam or the Glasgow Coma Scale to aid with assessment of consciousness, studies have identified multiple limitations of doing so. Neurobehavioral assessment measures, such as the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, have been developed to address these shortcomings. Each behavioral metric has strengths as well as weaknesses when applied in the acute care setting. In this review, we appraise common assessment approaches, outline alternative measures for fine-tuning these assessments in the acute care setting, and highlight strategies for implementing these practices in an interdisciplinary manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":49544,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"621-633"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered Mental Status at the Extreme: Behavioral Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness.\",\"authors\":\"Neha Dhadwal, Kyle Cunningham, William Pino, Stephen Hampton, David Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Disorders of consciousness represent altered mental status at its most severe, comprising a continuum between coma, the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, the minimally conscious state, and emergence from the minimally conscious state. Patients often transition between these levels throughout their recovery, and determining a patient's current level can be challenging, particularly in the acute care setting. Although healthcare providers have classically relied on a bedside neurological exam or the Glasgow Coma Scale to aid with assessment of consciousness, studies have identified multiple limitations of doing so. Neurobehavioral assessment measures, such as the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, have been developed to address these shortcomings. Each behavioral metric has strengths as well as weaknesses when applied in the acute care setting. In this review, we appraise common assessment approaches, outline alternative measures for fine-tuning these assessments in the acute care setting, and highlight strategies for implementing these practices in an interdisciplinary manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"621-633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788807\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意识障碍代表了最严重的精神状态改变,由昏迷、植物人状态/无反应清醒综合征、微意识状态和脱离微意识状态之间的连续体组成。患者在整个康复过程中经常会在这些状态之间转换,因此确定患者当前的状态非常具有挑战性,尤其是在急症护理环境中。尽管医护人员通常依赖床旁神经系统检查或格拉斯哥昏迷量表来帮助评估意识状态,但研究发现这样做存在多种局限性。昏迷恢复量表(Coma Recovery Scale-Revised )等神经行为评估方法就是为了解决这些不足而开发的。在急症护理环境中应用时,每种行为指标都有其优点和缺点。在这篇综述中,我们评估了常见的评估方法,概述了在急症护理环境中微调这些评估的替代措施,并强调了以跨学科方式实施这些方法的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Altered Mental Status at the Extreme: Behavioral Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness.

Disorders of consciousness represent altered mental status at its most severe, comprising a continuum between coma, the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, the minimally conscious state, and emergence from the minimally conscious state. Patients often transition between these levels throughout their recovery, and determining a patient's current level can be challenging, particularly in the acute care setting. Although healthcare providers have classically relied on a bedside neurological exam or the Glasgow Coma Scale to aid with assessment of consciousness, studies have identified multiple limitations of doing so. Neurobehavioral assessment measures, such as the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, have been developed to address these shortcomings. Each behavioral metric has strengths as well as weaknesses when applied in the acute care setting. In this review, we appraise common assessment approaches, outline alternative measures for fine-tuning these assessments in the acute care setting, and highlight strategies for implementing these practices in an interdisciplinary manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Neurology
Seminars in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Neurology is a review journal on current trends in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of neurological diseases. Areas of coverage include multiple sclerosis, central nervous system infections, muscular dystrophy, neuro-immunology, spinal disorders, strokes, epilepsy, motor neuron diseases, movement disorders, higher cortical function, neuro-genetics and neuro-ophthamology. Each issue is presented under the direction of an expert guest editor, and invited contributors focus on a single, high-interest clinical topic. Up-to-the-minute coverage of the latest information in the field makes this journal an invaluable resource for neurologists and residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信