接触一定会导致误信吗？关于健康误导易感性的荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 2区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1177/09636625241266150

Jinhui Li, Xiaodong Yang

{"title":"接触一定会导致误信吗？关于健康误导易感性的荟萃分析。","authors":"Jinhui Li, Xiaodong Yang","doi":"10.1177/09636625241266150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the overall effect of health misinformation exposure on shaping misbelief. Aggregation of results from 28 individual randomized controlled trial studies (n = 8752) reveals a positive but small average effect, d = 0.28. Moderation analyses suggest that adults who are younger and female tend to develop higher misbelief if exposed to health misinformation. Furthermore, media platform, message falsity, and misbelief measurements also contribute to the exposure effect. These findings offer nuanced but crucial insights into existing misinformation literature, and development of more effective strategies to mitigate the adverse impacts of health misinformation.","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":" ","pages":"9636625241266150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does exposure necessarily lead to misbelief? A meta-analysis of susceptibility to health misinformation.\",\"authors\":\"Jinhui Li, Xiaodong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09636625241266150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the overall effect of health misinformation exposure on shaping misbelief. Aggregation of results from 28 individual randomized controlled trial studies (n = 8752) reveals a positive but small average effect, d = 0.28. Moderation analyses suggest that adults who are younger and female tend to develop higher misbelief if exposed to health misinformation. Furthermore, media platform, message falsity, and misbelief measurements also contribute to the exposure effect. These findings offer nuanced but crucial insights into existing misinformation literature, and development of more effective strategies to mitigate the adverse impacts of health misinformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Understanding of Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9636625241266150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Understanding of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241266150\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241266150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为了量化健康误导信息对形成误信的总体影响，我们进行了一项荟萃分析。对 28 项随机对照试验研究（n = 8752）的结果进行汇总后发现，平均效应（d = 0.28）为正但较小。调节分析表明，如果接触到健康误导信息，年龄较小且为女性的成年人往往会产生更高的误信程度。此外，媒体平台、信息虚假性和误信测量也会对暴露效应产生影响。这些发现为现有的误导文献提供了细微但至关重要的见解，并为制定更有效的策略以减轻健康误导的不利影响提供了依据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does exposure necessarily lead to misbelief? A meta-analysis of susceptibility to health misinformation.

A meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the overall effect of health misinformation exposure on shaping misbelief. Aggregation of results from 28 individual randomized controlled trial studies (n = 8752) reveals a positive but small average effect, d = 0.28. Moderation analyses suggest that adults who are younger and female tend to develop higher misbelief if exposed to health misinformation. Furthermore, media platform, message falsity, and misbelief measurements also contribute to the exposure effect. These findings offer nuanced but crucial insights into existing misinformation literature, and development of more effective strategies to mitigate the adverse impacts of health misinformation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Understanding of Science Multiple-

CiteScore

7.30

自引率

9.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools