Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Abby T Compton, Sydney H Swafford, Megan E Renna, Tanner Thorsen, Jon Stavres, Austin J Graybeal
{"title":"姿势取向对智能手表生物电阻抗分析法得出的身体成分和体内总水分估计值的影响:设备内和设备间评估。","authors":"Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Abby T Compton, Sydney H Swafford, Megan E Renna, Tanner Thorsen, Jon Stavres, Austin J Graybeal","doi":"10.2478/joeb-2024-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in wearable technologies now allow modern smartwatches to collect body composition estimates through bioelectrical impedance techniques embedded within their design. However, this technique is susceptible to increased measurement error when postural changes alter body fluid distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of postural orientation on body composition and total body water (TBW) estimates produced by smartwatch bioelectrical impedance analysis (SWBIA) and determine its agreement with criterion measures. For this cross-sectional evaluation, 117 (age: 21.4±3.0 y; BMI: 25.3±5.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participants (F:69, M:48) completed SWBIA measurements while in the seated, standing, and supine positions, then underwent criterion dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) assessments. In the combined sample and females, body fat percent, fat mass, and fat-free mass using SWBIA were significantly different between the supine and standing positions (all p<0.001), though group level agreement with DXA was similar across positions. Supine SWBIA TBW estimates were significantly different between seated and standing estimates (all p≤0.026), but further analyses revealed that this was driven by the supine and seated differences observed in females (p=0.003). SWBIA TBW demonstrated similar group and individual level agreement with BIS across body positions with slight improvements observed during seated and supine assessments for females and males, respectively. SWBIA may demonstrate slight intra- and inter-device differences in body composition and TBW when measured across postural orientations, though further evaluations in external/clinical samples are necessary. While sex/position-specific guidelines may improve precision, these findings highlight the importance of standardized body positioning when using SWBIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":38125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","volume":"15 1","pages":"89-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of postural orientation on body composition and total body water estimates produced by smartwatch bioelectrical impedance analysis: an intra- and inter-device evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Abby T Compton, Sydney H Swafford, Megan E Renna, Tanner Thorsen, Jon Stavres, Austin J Graybeal\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/joeb-2024-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advances in wearable technologies now allow modern smartwatches to collect body composition estimates through bioelectrical impedance techniques embedded within their design. However, this technique is susceptible to increased measurement error when postural changes alter body fluid distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of postural orientation on body composition and total body water (TBW) estimates produced by smartwatch bioelectrical impedance analysis (SWBIA) and determine its agreement with criterion measures. For this cross-sectional evaluation, 117 (age: 21.4±3.0 y; BMI: 25.3±5.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participants (F:69, M:48) completed SWBIA measurements while in the seated, standing, and supine positions, then underwent criterion dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) assessments. In the combined sample and females, body fat percent, fat mass, and fat-free mass using SWBIA were significantly different between the supine and standing positions (all p<0.001), though group level agreement with DXA was similar across positions. Supine SWBIA TBW estimates were significantly different between seated and standing estimates (all p≤0.026), but further analyses revealed that this was driven by the supine and seated differences observed in females (p=0.003). SWBIA TBW demonstrated similar group and individual level agreement with BIS across body positions with slight improvements observed during seated and supine assessments for females and males, respectively. SWBIA may demonstrate slight intra- and inter-device differences in body composition and TBW when measured across postural orientations, though further evaluations in external/clinical samples are necessary. While sex/position-specific guidelines may improve precision, these findings highlight the importance of standardized body positioning when using SWBIA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"89-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2024-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2024-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
可穿戴技术的进步使现代智能手表能够通过其设计中嵌入的生物电阻抗技术收集身体成分估计值。然而,当姿势变化改变体液分布时,这种技术容易增加测量误差。本研究的目的是评估姿势取向对智能手表生物电阻抗分析(SWBIA)得出的身体成分和体内总水分(TBW)估计值的影响,并确定其与标准测量值的一致性。在这项横断面评估中,117 名参与者(年龄:21.4±3.0 岁;体重指数:25.3±5.7 kg/m2)(女:69 人,男:48 人)在坐位、站立位和仰卧位时完成了 SWBIA 测量,然后接受了标准双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)和生物电阻抗谱法(BIS)评估。在联合样本和女性样本中,使用 SWBIA 测量的体脂率、脂肪量和无脂肪量在仰卧位和站立位之间存在显著差异(所有 P
The effect of postural orientation on body composition and total body water estimates produced by smartwatch bioelectrical impedance analysis: an intra- and inter-device evaluation.
Advances in wearable technologies now allow modern smartwatches to collect body composition estimates through bioelectrical impedance techniques embedded within their design. However, this technique is susceptible to increased measurement error when postural changes alter body fluid distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of postural orientation on body composition and total body water (TBW) estimates produced by smartwatch bioelectrical impedance analysis (SWBIA) and determine its agreement with criterion measures. For this cross-sectional evaluation, 117 (age: 21.4±3.0 y; BMI: 25.3±5.7 kg/m2) participants (F:69, M:48) completed SWBIA measurements while in the seated, standing, and supine positions, then underwent criterion dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) assessments. In the combined sample and females, body fat percent, fat mass, and fat-free mass using SWBIA were significantly different between the supine and standing positions (all p<0.001), though group level agreement with DXA was similar across positions. Supine SWBIA TBW estimates were significantly different between seated and standing estimates (all p≤0.026), but further analyses revealed that this was driven by the supine and seated differences observed in females (p=0.003). SWBIA TBW demonstrated similar group and individual level agreement with BIS across body positions with slight improvements observed during seated and supine assessments for females and males, respectively. SWBIA may demonstrate slight intra- and inter-device differences in body composition and TBW when measured across postural orientations, though further evaluations in external/clinical samples are necessary. While sex/position-specific guidelines may improve precision, these findings highlight the importance of standardized body positioning when using SWBIA.