Sunil Shrestha, Simit Sapkota, Siew Li Teoh, Bhuvan Kc, Vibhu Paudyal, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Siew Hua Gan
{"title":"癌症患者疼痛特征、生活质量和疼痛管理综合评估:一项多中心横断面研究。","authors":"Sunil Shrestha, Simit Sapkota, Siew Li Teoh, Bhuvan Kc, Vibhu Paudyal, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Siew Hua Gan","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03725-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain is the most common complaint among cancer patients, significantly impairing their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There is limited evidence on the characteristics of pain among cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pain, factors influencing pain intensity, and the association of pain severity with quality of life (QoL) among cancer patients. Secondary objectives included investigating perceived barriers to pain management and medication adherence among these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center, cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients (over 18 years old) with reported cancer diagnoses experiencing pain. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, educational status), clinical characteristics (e.g. cancer diagnosis, staging), and pain characteristics (e.g., duration, type, location, medicines used for pain management, etc.) were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain management Index, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Barriers Questionnaire II, Medication Adherence Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eight patients participated in the study. The mean ± SD age was 54.87 ± 15.65, with 226 patients (55.4%) being female. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical (17.6%), lung (11.8%), and colon/rectum (12.0%) cancers. The most common pain locations were the head and neck (27.0%); a majority (55.6%) reported pain duration of more than 3 months. Nociceptive pain was reported by 42.4% of patients; the mean ± SD of NRS was 4.31 ± 2.69, with 32.4% of patients experiencing moderate pain. Patients with mixed pain type (B = 1.458, p < 0.001) or pain in multiple sites (B = 1.175, p < 0.001), lower Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (B = -1.308, p < 0.001), and specific cancer diagnoses such as prostate (B = -2.045, p = 0.002), pancreatic (B = 1.852, p = 0.004), oesophageal (B = 1.674, p = 0.012), and ovarian cancer (B = 1.967, p = 0.047), experienced varying degrees of increased NRS score. The combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment modality was associated with a lower NRS score (B = -0.583, p = 0.017). A significant inverse relationship was observed between pain severity and global health status/QoL (B = -37.36, p < 0.001. Key barriers to pain management included moderate perceptions of physiological effects, communication issues between doctors and patients, and concerns about the harmful effects of pain medicine. The prevalence of non-adherence to pain medications was 13.97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study highlights the multi-faceted nature of pain management and QoL for cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of pain perception in cancer patients, with mixed pain types, pain in multiple sites, lower KPS, and specific cancer diagnoses, all contributing significantly to pain severity. Additionally, pain severity was associated with declining QoL. These findings contribute valuable insights into the complex aspects of cancer pain and its broader implications for the well-being of patients, offering a foundation for targeted interventions and improved pain management strategies in the context of cancer care in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"2755-2771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics, quality of life, and pain management in cancer patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Shrestha, Simit Sapkota, Siew Li Teoh, Bhuvan Kc, Vibhu Paudyal, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Siew Hua Gan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-024-03725-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain is the most common complaint among cancer patients, significantly impairing their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There is limited evidence on the characteristics of pain among cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pain, factors influencing pain intensity, and the association of pain severity with quality of life (QoL) among cancer patients. Secondary objectives included investigating perceived barriers to pain management and medication adherence among these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center, cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients (over 18 years old) with reported cancer diagnoses experiencing pain. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, educational status), clinical characteristics (e.g. cancer diagnosis, staging), and pain characteristics (e.g., duration, type, location, medicines used for pain management, etc.) were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain management Index, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Barriers Questionnaire II, Medication Adherence Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eight patients participated in the study. The mean ± SD age was 54.87 ± 15.65, with 226 patients (55.4%) being female. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical (17.6%), lung (11.8%), and colon/rectum (12.0%) cancers. The most common pain locations were the head and neck (27.0%); a majority (55.6%) reported pain duration of more than 3 months. Nociceptive pain was reported by 42.4% of patients; the mean ± SD of NRS was 4.31 ± 2.69, with 32.4% of patients experiencing moderate pain. Patients with mixed pain type (B = 1.458, p < 0.001) or pain in multiple sites (B = 1.175, p < 0.001), lower Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (B = -1.308, p < 0.001), and specific cancer diagnoses such as prostate (B = -2.045, p = 0.002), pancreatic (B = 1.852, p = 0.004), oesophageal (B = 1.674, p = 0.012), and ovarian cancer (B = 1.967, p = 0.047), experienced varying degrees of increased NRS score. The combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment modality was associated with a lower NRS score (B = -0.583, p = 0.017). A significant inverse relationship was observed between pain severity and global health status/QoL (B = -37.36, p < 0.001. Key barriers to pain management included moderate perceptions of physiological effects, communication issues between doctors and patients, and concerns about the harmful effects of pain medicine. The prevalence of non-adherence to pain medications was 13.97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study highlights the multi-faceted nature of pain management and QoL for cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of pain perception in cancer patients, with mixed pain types, pain in multiple sites, lower KPS, and specific cancer diagnoses, all contributing significantly to pain severity. Additionally, pain severity was associated with declining QoL. These findings contribute valuable insights into the complex aspects of cancer pain and its broader implications for the well-being of patients, offering a foundation for targeted interventions and improved pain management strategies in the context of cancer care in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2755-2771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03725-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03725-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介疼痛是癌症患者最常见的主诉,严重影响了他们与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)。有关尼泊尔低资源环境下癌症患者疼痛特征的证据有限:本研究的主要目的是评估癌症患者疼痛的临床特征、影响疼痛强度的因素以及疼痛严重程度与生活质量(QoL)的关系。次要目标包括调查这些患者在疼痛管理和坚持用药方面遇到的障碍:这项多中心横断面研究招募了报告确诊为癌症的成年疼痛患者(18 岁以上)。社会人口学特征(如年龄、性别、教育状况)、临床特征(如癌症诊断、分期)和疼痛特征(如疼痛持续时间、类型、部位、止痛药物等)均被记录在案。结果采用数字评分量表(NRS)、疼痛管理指数、欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷、障碍问卷 II、用药依从性评分量表以及医院焦虑和抑郁量表进行评估:共有 48 名患者参与研究。平均(±SD)年龄为(54.87±15.65)岁,其中 226 名患者(55.4%)为女性。最常见的癌症诊断为宫颈癌(17.6%)、肺癌(11.8%)和结肠/直肠癌(12.0%)。最常见的疼痛部位是头颈部(27.0%);大多数人(55.6%)报告的疼痛持续时间超过 3 个月。42.4%的患者报告有痛觉疼痛;NRS的平均值(± SD)为4.31±2.69,32.4%的患者有中度疼痛。混合型疼痛患者(B = 1.458,P总之,本研究强调了尼泊尔资源匮乏地区癌症患者疼痛管理和 QoL 的多面性。这些发现强调了癌症患者疼痛感的多因素性质,混合疼痛类型、多部位疼痛、较低的 KPS 以及特定的癌症诊断都是导致疼痛严重程度的重要因素。此外,疼痛严重程度还与 QoL 下降有关。这些发现有助于深入了解癌症疼痛的复杂性及其对患者福祉的广泛影响,为在低资源环境下的癌症护理中采取有针对性的干预措施和改进疼痛管理策略奠定了基础。
Comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics, quality of life, and pain management in cancer patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study.
Introduction: Pain is the most common complaint among cancer patients, significantly impairing their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There is limited evidence on the characteristics of pain among cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pain, factors influencing pain intensity, and the association of pain severity with quality of life (QoL) among cancer patients. Secondary objectives included investigating perceived barriers to pain management and medication adherence among these patients.
Methods: This multi-center, cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients (over 18 years old) with reported cancer diagnoses experiencing pain. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, educational status), clinical characteristics (e.g. cancer diagnosis, staging), and pain characteristics (e.g., duration, type, location, medicines used for pain management, etc.) were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain management Index, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Barriers Questionnaire II, Medication Adherence Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Results: Four hundred and eight patients participated in the study. The mean ± SD age was 54.87 ± 15.65, with 226 patients (55.4%) being female. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical (17.6%), lung (11.8%), and colon/rectum (12.0%) cancers. The most common pain locations were the head and neck (27.0%); a majority (55.6%) reported pain duration of more than 3 months. Nociceptive pain was reported by 42.4% of patients; the mean ± SD of NRS was 4.31 ± 2.69, with 32.4% of patients experiencing moderate pain. Patients with mixed pain type (B = 1.458, p < 0.001) or pain in multiple sites (B = 1.175, p < 0.001), lower Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (B = -1.308, p < 0.001), and specific cancer diagnoses such as prostate (B = -2.045, p = 0.002), pancreatic (B = 1.852, p = 0.004), oesophageal (B = 1.674, p = 0.012), and ovarian cancer (B = 1.967, p = 0.047), experienced varying degrees of increased NRS score. The combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment modality was associated with a lower NRS score (B = -0.583, p = 0.017). A significant inverse relationship was observed between pain severity and global health status/QoL (B = -37.36, p < 0.001. Key barriers to pain management included moderate perceptions of physiological effects, communication issues between doctors and patients, and concerns about the harmful effects of pain medicine. The prevalence of non-adherence to pain medications was 13.97%.
Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights the multi-faceted nature of pain management and QoL for cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of pain perception in cancer patients, with mixed pain types, pain in multiple sites, lower KPS, and specific cancer diagnoses, all contributing significantly to pain severity. Additionally, pain severity was associated with declining QoL. These findings contribute valuable insights into the complex aspects of cancer pain and its broader implications for the well-being of patients, offering a foundation for targeted interventions and improved pain management strategies in the context of cancer care in low-resource settings.
期刊介绍:
Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences.
Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership.
This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.