急性胆源性胰腺炎合并胆总管结石患者 MRCP 阴性诊断的风险因素。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Si-Hai Chen, Wen-Qing Wang, Xiao Fei, Yin Zhu, Xu Shu, Chen Yu, Qian Liao, Hui-Fang Xiong
{"title":"急性胆源性胰腺炎合并胆总管结石患者 MRCP 阴性诊断的风险因素。","authors":"Si-Hai Chen, Wen-Qing Wang, Xiao Fei, Yin Zhu, Xu Shu, Chen Yu, Qian Liao, Hui-Fang Xiong","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in acute biliary pancreatitis patients with choledocholithiasis.\",\"authors\":\"Si-Hai Chen, Wen-Qing Wang, Xiao Fei, Yin Zhu, Xu Shu, Chen Yu, Qian Liao, Hui-Fang Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)中,评估是否存在胆总管结石至关重要。磁共振胰胆管造影术(MRCP)和内窥镜超声波造影术(EUS)被广泛用于确定总胆管(CBD)的胆结石。与 MRCP 相比,EUS 具有更好的诊断准确性和灵敏度,但由于需要镇静,因此存在一定的风险。为了更好地选择 MRCP 或 EUS,我们对 ABP 胆总管结石患者 MRCP 阴性诊断的风险因素进行了调查:本研究回顾性纳入了 2321 例 ABP 患者。根据排除标准,最终纳入了 337 名 MRCP 结果为阴性的 ABP 患者。在这些患者中,75 名患者的 EUS 结果呈阳性。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型筛选胆总管结石 ABP 患者 MRCP 阴性诊断的风险因素:结果:与EUS检查结果为阴性的患者相比,EUS检查结果为阳性的患者年龄更大(62.0岁对55.0岁),有胆囊切除术史的比例更高(18.7%对7.3%)。单变量逻辑回归结果显示,胆囊切除术史、年龄和性别是潜在的风险因素(均 p < 0.05)。调整其他潜在危险因素(直接胆红素(DBIL)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)和碱性磷酸酶(ALP))后,胆囊切除术史(OR = 2.859[1.312,6.23])、年龄较大(1.03[1.009,1.052])和男性(2.016[1.152,3.528])是ABP胆总管结石患者MRCP阴性诊断的独立危险因素:结论:有胆囊切除术史、年龄较大和男性是 ABP 胆总管结石患者 MRCP 阴性诊断风险增加的独立相关因素。我们建议有这些风险因素的患者应首先接受 EUS 检查,而不是 MRCP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in acute biliary pancreatitis patients with choledocholithiasis.

Background: Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS.

Methods: A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.

Results: Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis.

Conclusions: The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信