[格拉斯哥-爱丁堡咽喉量表德文版的可靠性和有效性]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jiri Podzimek, Peter Jecker, Sven Koscielny, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
{"title":"[格拉斯哥-爱丁堡咽喉量表德文版的可靠性和有效性]。","authors":"Jiri Podzimek, Peter Jecker, Sven Koscielny, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius","doi":"10.1055/a-2362-0465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients who consult the ENT doctor suffer from globus sensation, as a term for a multifactorial symptom description. It is particularly important during initial consultation to take the often-sensitive patients seriously and to offer a structured diagnostic clarification. Today, there is a lack of a screening tool in everyday clinical practice that can be used to differentiate the globus sensations more closely and assess their severity OBJECTIVES: The reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) were examined.</p><p><strong>Materials und methods: </strong>The original GETS questionnaire was translated into German (GETS-G) and completed by 60 patients with globus sensation (>3 months) in a prospective observational study. All patients received a clinical examination a sonography of the neck. In patients without an identifiable organic cause, a pH monitoring was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A local organic cause for the globus sensation was found in 30 patients (50%). In addition, reflux was detected in 24 patients (40%) using pH monitoring. No cause could be determined in only 6 patients (10%). According to the overall score (Q1-Q12), there was no significant difference between these three groups. The Cronbach's alpha for assessing reliability was 0.88 in the 12-item analysis. Principal component analysis yielded a globus scale, dysphagia scale and a chronic pharyngeal irritation scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GETS-G showed high reliability and validity, which justifies its use in patients with globus sensation in German-speaking countries and may lead to a better assessment of the severity of this symptom.</p>","PeriodicalId":17965,"journal":{"name":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale].\",\"authors\":\"Jiri Podzimek, Peter Jecker, Sven Koscielny, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2362-0465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients who consult the ENT doctor suffer from globus sensation, as a term for a multifactorial symptom description. It is particularly important during initial consultation to take the often-sensitive patients seriously and to offer a structured diagnostic clarification. Today, there is a lack of a screening tool in everyday clinical practice that can be used to differentiate the globus sensations more closely and assess their severity OBJECTIVES: The reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) were examined.</p><p><strong>Materials und methods: </strong>The original GETS questionnaire was translated into German (GETS-G) and completed by 60 patients with globus sensation (>3 months) in a prospective observational study. All patients received a clinical examination a sonography of the neck. In patients without an identifiable organic cause, a pH monitoring was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A local organic cause for the globus sensation was found in 30 patients (50%). In addition, reflux was detected in 24 patients (40%) using pH monitoring. No cause could be determined in only 6 patients (10%). According to the overall score (Q1-Q12), there was no significant difference between these three groups. The Cronbach's alpha for assessing reliability was 0.88 in the 12-item analysis. Principal component analysis yielded a globus scale, dysphagia scale and a chronic pharyngeal irritation scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GETS-G showed high reliability and validity, which justifies its use in patients with globus sensation in German-speaking countries and may lead to a better assessment of the severity of this symptom.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngo-rhino-otologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngo-rhino-otologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2362-0465\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2362-0465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多向耳鼻喉科医生求诊的患者都有 "球状感觉",这是一个多因素症状描述的术语。在初诊时,认真对待这些通常比较敏感的患者并提供有条理的诊断说明尤为重要。目前,在日常临床实践中缺乏一种筛查工具,可用于更仔细地区分球状感觉并评估其严重程度:研究了格拉斯哥-爱丁堡咽喉量表(GETS)德文版的可靠性和有效性:将原版 GETS 问卷翻译成德语(GETS-G),并在一项前瞻性观察研究中由 60 名有喉结感(超过 3 个月)的患者填写。所有患者均接受了临床检查和颈部超声波检查。在无法确定病因的患者中,还进行了 pH 值监测:结果:30 名患者(50%)发现了引起球状感觉的局部器质性病因。此外,24 名患者(40%)通过 pH 值监测发现了胃液反流。只有 6 名患者(10%)无法确定病因。根据总评分(Q1-Q12),这三类患者之间没有明显差异。在 12 个项目的分析中,用于评估可靠性的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.88。通过主成分分析,得出了喉结量表、吞咽困难量表和慢性咽刺激量表:GETS-G显示出较高的信度和效度,这证明其适用于德语国家的咽球感患者,并能更好地评估该症状的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale].

Background: Many patients who consult the ENT doctor suffer from globus sensation, as a term for a multifactorial symptom description. It is particularly important during initial consultation to take the often-sensitive patients seriously and to offer a structured diagnostic clarification. Today, there is a lack of a screening tool in everyday clinical practice that can be used to differentiate the globus sensations more closely and assess their severity OBJECTIVES: The reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) were examined.

Materials und methods: The original GETS questionnaire was translated into German (GETS-G) and completed by 60 patients with globus sensation (>3 months) in a prospective observational study. All patients received a clinical examination a sonography of the neck. In patients without an identifiable organic cause, a pH monitoring was carried out.

Results: A local organic cause for the globus sensation was found in 30 patients (50%). In addition, reflux was detected in 24 patients (40%) using pH monitoring. No cause could be determined in only 6 patients (10%). According to the overall score (Q1-Q12), there was no significant difference between these three groups. The Cronbach's alpha for assessing reliability was 0.88 in the 12-item analysis. Principal component analysis yielded a globus scale, dysphagia scale and a chronic pharyngeal irritation scale.

Conclusions: The GETS-G showed high reliability and validity, which justifies its use in patients with globus sensation in German-speaking countries and may lead to a better assessment of the severity of this symptom.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngo-rhino-otologie
Laryngo-rhino-otologie 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
1399
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie ist die deutschsprachige Fachzeitschrift für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis mit Fokus auf die Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie. Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie bringt die Themen, die Sie wirklich interessieren und in der täglichen Arbeit unterstützen: Kurze, leicht lesbare Beiträge, interessante Rubriken und Originalarbeiten mit Relevanz für Ihre Arbeit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信