在三种视野设置下使用锥形束计算机断层扫描、传统射线照相术和电子心尖定位仪测量工作长度的准确性:体外研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Arash Izadi, Faezeh Golmakani, Ezatolah Kazeminejad, Amin Mahdavi Asl
{"title":"在三种视野设置下使用锥形束计算机断层扫描、传统射线照相术和电子心尖定位仪测量工作长度的准确性:体外研究。","authors":"Arash Izadi, Faezeh Golmakani, Ezatolah Kazeminejad, Amin Mahdavi Asl","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.97769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determining the working length (WL) in root canal treatment facilitates the treatment prognosis. The introduction of apex locators and new CBCT devices in dentistry influenced this consideration. This comparative study evaluated the accuracy of working length measurement by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in three fields of view (FOVs), conventional radiography, and the apex locator Raypex 5.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The descriptive-analytical study was performed on 40 lower premolar teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Direct observation under the microscope was considered the gold standard and compared with measurements by the electronic apex locator, CBCT, and periapical images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were analyzed by paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests. A significance level of 0.05 was considered in this study. CBCT 5×5 FOV with a p-value of 0.733 and analog radiography with a p-value of 0.001 achieved the working lengths with the highest and lowest accuracy, respectively. In addition, the difference between actual and measured working length using analog radiography was significant (p-value <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the results of this study, CBCT images at different FOVs and those taken by the apex locator Raypex 5 can be used as a reliable method for estimating the working length. (EEJ-2023-10-141).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"266-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Working Length Measurement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography at Three Field of View Settings, Conventional Radiography, and Electronic Apex Locator: An Ex-vivo Study.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Izadi, Faezeh Golmakani, Ezatolah Kazeminejad, Amin Mahdavi Asl\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2023.97769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determining the working length (WL) in root canal treatment facilitates the treatment prognosis. The introduction of apex locators and new CBCT devices in dentistry influenced this consideration. This comparative study evaluated the accuracy of working length measurement by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in three fields of view (FOVs), conventional radiography, and the apex locator Raypex 5.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The descriptive-analytical study was performed on 40 lower premolar teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Direct observation under the microscope was considered the gold standard and compared with measurements by the electronic apex locator, CBCT, and periapical images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were analyzed by paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests. A significance level of 0.05 was considered in this study. CBCT 5×5 FOV with a p-value of 0.733 and analog radiography with a p-value of 0.001 achieved the working lengths with the highest and lowest accuracy, respectively. In addition, the difference between actual and measured working length using analog radiography was significant (p-value <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the results of this study, CBCT images at different FOVs and those taken by the apex locator Raypex 5 can be used as a reliable method for estimating the working length. (EEJ-2023-10-141).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"266-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.97769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.97769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定根管治疗的工作长度(WL)有助于治疗预后。牙科中引入的根尖定位器和新型 CBCT 设备影响了这一考虑。这项比较研究评估了锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在三个视场(FOV)、传统射线照相术和根尖定位仪 Raypex 5 测量工作长度的准确性:方法:对符合纳入标准的 40 颗下前磨牙进行描述性分析研究。显微镜下的直接观察被认为是金标准,并与电子牙尖定位仪、CBCT 和根尖周图像的测量结果进行比较:结果:采用配对 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验对结果进行分析。本研究的显著性水平为 0.05。CBCT 5×5 FOV(p 值为 0.733)和模拟射线摄影(p 值为 0.001)分别获得了精确度最高和最低的工作长度。此外,模拟射线照相法的实际工作长度与测量工作长度之间的差异显著(p 值 结论):根据这项研究的结果,不同 FOV 的 CBCT 图像和由牙尖定位仪 Raypex 5 拍摄的图像可作为估算工作长度的可靠方法。(EEJ-2023-10-141)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Working Length Measurement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography at Three Field of View Settings, Conventional Radiography, and Electronic Apex Locator: An Ex-vivo Study.

Objectives: Determining the working length (WL) in root canal treatment facilitates the treatment prognosis. The introduction of apex locators and new CBCT devices in dentistry influenced this consideration. This comparative study evaluated the accuracy of working length measurement by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in three fields of view (FOVs), conventional radiography, and the apex locator Raypex 5.

Methodology: The descriptive-analytical study was performed on 40 lower premolar teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Direct observation under the microscope was considered the gold standard and compared with measurements by the electronic apex locator, CBCT, and periapical images.

Results: The results were analyzed by paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests. A significance level of 0.05 was considered in this study. CBCT 5×5 FOV with a p-value of 0.733 and analog radiography with a p-value of 0.001 achieved the working lengths with the highest and lowest accuracy, respectively. In addition, the difference between actual and measured working length using analog radiography was significant (p-value <0.05).

Conclusions: According to the results of this study, CBCT images at different FOVs and those taken by the apex locator Raypex 5 can be used as a reliable method for estimating the working length. (EEJ-2023-10-141).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信