估计葡萄糖排出率对检测心力衰竭的有用性:1999-2018 年全国健康与营养状况调查的结果。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Daoliang Zhang, Wenrui Shi, Tao An, Chao Li, Zhaohui Ding, Jian Zhang
{"title":"估计葡萄糖排出率对检测心力衰竭的有用性:1999-2018 年全国健康与营养状况调查的结果。","authors":"Daoliang Zhang, Wenrui Shi, Tao An, Chao Li, Zhaohui Ding, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01402-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a novel, clinically available, and cost-effective surrogate of insulin resistance. The current study aimed to assess the association between eGDR and prevalent heart failure (HF), and further evaluate the value of eGDR in detecting prevalent HF in a general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>25,450 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018 were included. HF was recorded according to the subjects' reports. Logistic regression was employed to analyze the association between eGDR and HF, the results were summarized as Per standard deviation (SD) change. Then, subgroup analysis tested whether the main result from logistic regression was robust in several conventional subpopulations. Finally, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and reclassification analysis were utilized to evaluate the potential value of eGDR in improving the detection of prevalent HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of reported HF was 2.96% (753 subjects). After adjusting demographic, laboratory, anthropometric, and medical history data, each SD increment of eGDR could result in a 43.3% (P < 0.001) risk reduction for prevalent HF. In the quartile analysis, the top quartile had a 31.1% (P < 0.001) risk of prevalent HF compared to the bottom quartile in the full model. Smooth curve fitting demonstrated that the association was linear in the whole range of eGDR (P for non-linearity = 0.313). Subgroup analysis revealed that the association was robust in age, sex, race, diabetes, and hypertension subgroups (All P for interaction > 0.05). Additionally, ROC analysis displayed a significant improvement in the detection of prevalent HF (0.869 vs. 0.873, P = 0.008); reclassification analysis also confirmed the improvement from eGDR (All P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that eGDR, a costless surrogate of insulin resistance, may have a linear and robust association with the prevalent HF. Furthermore, our findings implicate the potential value of eGDR in refining the detection of prevalent HF in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of estimated glucose disposal rate in detecting heart failure: results from national health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Daoliang Zhang, Wenrui Shi, Tao An, Chao Li, Zhaohui Ding, Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13098-024-01402-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a novel, clinically available, and cost-effective surrogate of insulin resistance. The current study aimed to assess the association between eGDR and prevalent heart failure (HF), and further evaluate the value of eGDR in detecting prevalent HF in a general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>25,450 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018 were included. HF was recorded according to the subjects' reports. Logistic regression was employed to analyze the association between eGDR and HF, the results were summarized as Per standard deviation (SD) change. Then, subgroup analysis tested whether the main result from logistic regression was robust in several conventional subpopulations. Finally, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and reclassification analysis were utilized to evaluate the potential value of eGDR in improving the detection of prevalent HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of reported HF was 2.96% (753 subjects). After adjusting demographic, laboratory, anthropometric, and medical history data, each SD increment of eGDR could result in a 43.3% (P < 0.001) risk reduction for prevalent HF. In the quartile analysis, the top quartile had a 31.1% (P < 0.001) risk of prevalent HF compared to the bottom quartile in the full model. Smooth curve fitting demonstrated that the association was linear in the whole range of eGDR (P for non-linearity = 0.313). Subgroup analysis revealed that the association was robust in age, sex, race, diabetes, and hypertension subgroups (All P for interaction > 0.05). Additionally, ROC analysis displayed a significant improvement in the detection of prevalent HF (0.869 vs. 0.873, P = 0.008); reclassification analysis also confirmed the improvement from eGDR (All P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that eGDR, a costless surrogate of insulin resistance, may have a linear and robust association with the prevalent HF. Furthermore, our findings implicate the potential value of eGDR in refining the detection of prevalent HF in the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01402-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01402-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:估计葡萄糖排出率(eGDR)是一种新型、临床可用且经济有效的胰岛素抵抗替代指标。本研究旨在评估 eGDR 与流行性心力衰竭(HF)之间的关联,并进一步评估 eGDR 在普通人群中检测流行性 HF 的价值。根据受试者的报告记录心房颤动。采用逻辑回归分析 eGDR 与 HF 之间的关联,结果以每标准差(SD)变化进行总结。然后,亚组分析检验了逻辑回归的主要结果在几个常规亚组中是否稳健。最后,利用接收者工作特征曲线(ROC)和再分类分析来评估 eGDR 在改善流行性心房颤动检测方面的潜在价值:报告的心房颤动患病率为 2.96%(753 名受试者)。在对人口统计学、实验室、人体测量和病史数据进行调整后,eGDR 每增加一个 SD 值可使患病率增加 43.3%(P 0.05)。此外,ROC 分析显示,eGDR 在检测流行性心房颤动方面有显著改善(0.869 对 0.873,P = 0.008);再分类分析也证实了 eGDR 的改善(All P 结论):我们的研究表明,eGDR 作为一种无成本的胰岛素抵抗替代物,可能与心房颤动的发病率有线性且稳健的联系。此外,我们的研究结果还表明,eGDR 在完善普通人群中流行性心房颤动的检测方面具有潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of estimated glucose disposal rate in detecting heart failure: results from national health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2018.

Background: Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a novel, clinically available, and cost-effective surrogate of insulin resistance. The current study aimed to assess the association between eGDR and prevalent heart failure (HF), and further evaluate the value of eGDR in detecting prevalent HF in a general population.

Methods: 25,450 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018 were included. HF was recorded according to the subjects' reports. Logistic regression was employed to analyze the association between eGDR and HF, the results were summarized as Per standard deviation (SD) change. Then, subgroup analysis tested whether the main result from logistic regression was robust in several conventional subpopulations. Finally, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and reclassification analysis were utilized to evaluate the potential value of eGDR in improving the detection of prevalent HF.

Results: The prevalence of reported HF was 2.96% (753 subjects). After adjusting demographic, laboratory, anthropometric, and medical history data, each SD increment of eGDR could result in a 43.3% (P < 0.001) risk reduction for prevalent HF. In the quartile analysis, the top quartile had a 31.1% (P < 0.001) risk of prevalent HF compared to the bottom quartile in the full model. Smooth curve fitting demonstrated that the association was linear in the whole range of eGDR (P for non-linearity = 0.313). Subgroup analysis revealed that the association was robust in age, sex, race, diabetes, and hypertension subgroups (All P for interaction > 0.05). Additionally, ROC analysis displayed a significant improvement in the detection of prevalent HF (0.869 vs. 0.873, P = 0.008); reclassification analysis also confirmed the improvement from eGDR (All P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study indicates that eGDR, a costless surrogate of insulin resistance, may have a linear and robust association with the prevalent HF. Furthermore, our findings implicate the potential value of eGDR in refining the detection of prevalent HF in the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信